From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261443AbVAGOtD (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:49:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261444AbVAGOs4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:48:56 -0500 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.195]:35508 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261443AbVAGOsj (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:48:39 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=n6WEzbQ8+S5+BR4Bkgcm/+Q+NJOBzujPy82cKY57jMA0IC+9y7poZaRWCPtHCLfRU9vRc7RX30TRcMdwAS6ckRdPoq4bus60drt/cpkjx7cQZ2c84RE5EvQy/iOxO9dmUK0Zx/wGfZ6ZfoG+NLOekSKc8t4zNOKl2GzyR6RaXTI= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:48:37 -0500 From: Dmitry Torokhov Reply-To: dtor_core@ameritech.net To: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH] swsusp: properly suspend and resume *all* devices Cc: Takashi Iwai , vojtech@suse.cz, Lion Vollnhals , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050107135418.GB1405@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1104696556.2478.12.camel@pefyra> <20050103084713.GB2099@elf.ucw.cz> <20050103101423.GA4441@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net> <20050103150505.GA4120@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net> <20050104214315.GB1520@elf.ucw.cz> <41DC0E70.4000005@schiggl.de> <20050106222927.GC25913@elf.ucw.cz> <20050107135418.GB1405@elf.ucw.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:54:18 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > I have a problem with net-devices, ne2000 in particular, in 2.6.9 and > > > > 2.6.10, too. After a resume the ne2000-device doesn't work anymore. I > > > > have to restart it using the initscripts. > > > > > > > > How do I add suspend/resume support (to ISA devices, like my ne2000)? > > > > Can you point me to some information/tutorial? > > > > > > Look how i8042 suspend/resume support is done and do it in similar > > > way... > > > > Yep it's fairly easy to implement in that way (I did for ALSA). > > > > But i8042 has also pm_register(), mentioning about APM. Isn't it > > redundant? > > Yes, it looks redundant. Vojtech, could you check why this is still > needed? It should not be. It is removed in -bk. -- Dmitry