From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261335AbVARP75 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:59:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261334AbVARP62 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:58:28 -0500 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.194]:27121 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261335AbVARP4m (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:56:42 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=F516zMD5p1uYhEHNRfSGgW+m3TunQ3JvUMPQ+9UWE41Cva1Nkfvu/MGx8jl2xgg4RzH7WdBzJZksBxi6XiOAs4h2U9srQjOjV1iQuVj7gc2im38jA/0iF0oPFSv7qDSPCD9iVou/Yutwr66chyBL2JVY0J4E0sB/TPClIeu8ung= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:56:40 -0500 From: Dmitry Torokhov Reply-To: dtor_core@ameritech.net To: Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Remove input_call_hotplug Cc: Linux Kernel , Vojtech Pavlik In-Reply-To: <41ED2457.1030109@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <41ED2457.1030109@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:59:35 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Implement proper class names for input drivers. > This patch probably should probably use atomic_inc in case we ever have non-serialized probe functions. But the real question is whether we really need class devices have unique names or we could do with inputX thus leaving individual drivers intact and only modifying the input core. As far as I understand userspace should be concerned only with device capabilities, not particular name, besides, it gets PRODUCT string which has all needed data encoded. What do you think? -- Dmitry