* RE: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to support nohotplug
@ 2005-06-08 16:23 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-08 16:26 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Abhay_Salunke @ 2005-06-08 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: greg; +Cc: dtor_core, linux-kernel, akpm, Matt_Domsch, ranty
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 11:10 AM
> To: Salunke, Abhay
> Cc: dtor_core@ameritech.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
akpm@osdl.org;
> Domsch, Matt; ranty@debian.org
> Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to
> support nohotplug
>
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:04:09AM -0500, Abhay_Salunke@Dell.com
wrote:
> > > I think it would be better if you just have request_firmware and
> > > request_firmware_nowait accept timeout parameter that would
override
> > > default timeout in firmware_class. 0 would mean use default,
> > > MAX_SCHED_TIMEOUT - wait indefinitely.
> >
> > But we still need to avoid hotplug being invoked as we need it be a
> > manual process.
>
> No, hotplug can happen just fine (it happens loads of times today for
> things that people don't care about.)
>
If hotplug happens the complete function is called which makes the
request_firmware return with a failure.
Abhay
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to support nohotplug
2005-06-08 16:23 [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to support nohotplug Abhay_Salunke
@ 2005-06-08 16:26 ` Greg KH
2005-06-08 17:06 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2005-06-08 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abhay_Salunke; +Cc: dtor_core, linux-kernel, akpm, Matt_Domsch, ranty
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:23:30AM -0500, Abhay_Salunke@Dell.com wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 11:10 AM
> > To: Salunke, Abhay
> > Cc: dtor_core@ameritech.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> akpm@osdl.org;
> > Domsch, Matt; ranty@debian.org
> > Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to
> > support nohotplug
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:04:09AM -0500, Abhay_Salunke@Dell.com
> wrote:
> > > > I think it would be better if you just have request_firmware and
> > > > request_firmware_nowait accept timeout parameter that would
> override
> > > > default timeout in firmware_class. 0 would mean use default,
> > > > MAX_SCHED_TIMEOUT - wait indefinitely.
> > >
> > > But we still need to avoid hotplug being invoked as we need it be a
> > > manual process.
> >
> > No, hotplug can happen just fine (it happens loads of times today for
> > things that people don't care about.)
> >
> If hotplug happens the complete function is called which makes the
> request_firmware return with a failure.
If this was true, then the current code would not work at all.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to support nohotplug
2005-06-08 16:26 ` Greg KH
@ 2005-06-08 17:06 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2005-06-08 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: Abhay_Salunke, linux-kernel, akpm, Matt_Domsch, ranty
On 6/8/05, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:23:30AM -0500, Abhay_Salunke@Dell.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 11:10 AM
> > > To: Salunke, Abhay
> > > Cc: dtor_core@ameritech.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > akpm@osdl.org;
> > > Domsch, Matt; ranty@debian.org
> > > Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to
> > > support nohotplug
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:04:09AM -0500, Abhay_Salunke@Dell.com
> > wrote:
> > > > > I think it would be better if you just have request_firmware and
> > > > > request_firmware_nowait accept timeout parameter that would
> > override
> > > > > default timeout in firmware_class. 0 would mean use default,
> > > > > MAX_SCHED_TIMEOUT - wait indefinitely.
> > > >
> > > > But we still need to avoid hotplug being invoked as we need it be a
> > > > manual process.
> > >
> > > No, hotplug can happen just fine (it happens loads of times today for
> > > things that people don't care about.)
> > >
> > If hotplug happens the complete function is called which makes the
> > request_firmware return with a failure.
>
> If this was true, then the current code would not work at all.
>
What Abhay is trying to say is that default firmware.agent when it
does not find requested firmware file writes -1 (abort) to "loading"
attribute causing firmware_request to fail.
I think it should be fixed in firmware.agent though, not in kernel -
the agent shoudl just recognoze that sometimes not having firmware
file is ok.
--
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* RE: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to support nohotplug
@ 2005-06-10 19:45 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-10 19:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Abhay_Salunke @ 2005-06-10 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dtor_core, greg; +Cc: linux-kernel, akpm, Matt_Domsch, ranty
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 11:10 AM
> > > > To: Salunke, Abhay
> > > > Cc: dtor_core@ameritech.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > > akpm@osdl.org;
> > > > Domsch, Matt; ranty@debian.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in
firmware_class.c to
> > > > support nohotplug
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:04:09AM -0500, Abhay_Salunke@Dell.com
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > I think it would be better if you just have request_firmware
and
> > > > > > request_firmware_nowait accept timeout parameter that would
> > > override
> > > > > > default timeout in firmware_class. 0 would mean use default,
> > > > > > MAX_SCHED_TIMEOUT - wait indefinitely.
> > > > >
> > > > > But we still need to avoid hotplug being invoked as we need it
be
> a
> > > > > manual process.
> > > >
> > > > No, hotplug can happen just fine (it happens loads of times
today
> for
> > > > things that people don't care about.)
> > > >
> > > If hotplug happens the complete function is called which makes the
> > > request_firmware return with a failure.
> >
> > If this was true, then the current code would not work at all.
> >
>
> What Abhay is trying to say is that default firmware.agent when it
> does not find requested firmware file writes -1 (abort) to "loading"
> attribute causing firmware_request to fail.
>
> I think it should be fixed in firmware.agent though, not in kernel -
> the agent shoudl just recognoze that sometimes not having firmware
> file is ok.
>
I tired to do the following
1. echo 0 > /sys/class/firmware/timeout
2. modify the firmware.agent by commenting echo -1 when file is not
present as below.
if [ -f "$FIRMWARE_DIR/$FIRMWARE" ]; then
echo 1 > $SYSFS/$DEVPATH/loading
cp "$FIRMWARE_DIR/$FIRMWARE" $SYSFS/$DEVPATH/data
echo 0 > $SYSFS/$DEVPATH/loading
else
# echo -1 > $SYSFS/$DEVPATH/loading
Fi
3. load the dell_rbu driver : see dell_rbu code snipped below
device_initialize(&rbu_device);
strncpy(rbu_device.bus_id,"dell_rbu", BUS_ID_SIZE);
rc = request_firmware_nowait(THIS_MODULE,
"dell_rbu", &rbu_device,
&context,
callbackfn);
if(rc) {
printk(KERN_ERR
"dcdrbu_init:"
" request_firmware_nowait failed %d\n", rc);
}
But this created a kernel Oops message as follows. Also note that
uncomment the line in firmware.agents fixed the Oops message.
Jun 10 19:29:39 localhost kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
dereference at virtual address 00000000
Jun 10 19:29:39 localhost kernel: printing eip:
Jun 10 19:29:39 localhost kernel: c0188b71
Jun 10 19:29:39 localhost kernel: *pde = 1fabe001
Jun 10 19:29:39 localhost kernel: Oops: 0000 [#2]
Jun 10 19:29:39 localhost kernel: SMP
Jun 10 19:29:39 localhost kernel: Modules linked in: dell_rbu(U) smbfs
parport_pc lp parport autofs4 sunrpc ipt_REJECT ipt_state ip_conntrack
iptable_filter ip_tables button battery ac md5 ipv6 ohci_hcd tg3 floppy
sg dm_snapshot dm_zero dm_mirror ext3 jbd dm_mod mptscsih mptbase sd_mod
scsi_mod
Jun 10 19:29:39 localhost kernel: CPU: 1
Jun 10 19:29:39 localhost kernel: EIP: 0060:[<c0188b71>] Not
tainted VLI
Jun 10 19:29:39 localhost kernel: EFLAGS: 00010286 (2.6.9-5.ELsmp)
Jun 10 19:29:39 localhost kernel: EIP is at object_path_length+0x10/0x25
Jun 10 19:29:39 localhost kernel: eax: 00000000 ebx: 00000001 ecx:
ffffffff edx: e0a8fb24
Jun 10 19:29:39 localhost kernel: esi: de3c089c edi: 00000000 ebp:
dde2b000 esp: d7a3fe4c
Jun 10 19:29:40 localhost kernel: ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Jun 10 19:29:40 localhost kernel: Process bash (pid: 2825,
threadinfo=d7a3f000 task=d739e630)
Jun 10 19:29:40 localhost kernel: Stack: 00000003 e0a8fb24 c0188cf8
e0a8fb24 c031fdc0 de3c089c e0a8fb24 de1ff188
Jun 10 19:29:40 localhost kernel: c0188dfa dde2b000 dde2b000
fffffff4 de3c089c d7a3ff0c c0188e47 d7a3f000
Jun 10 19:29:40 localhost kernel: 00000000 de3c089c d7a3ff0c
c0161400 dfe84b00 de3c089c 00000000 dfe84b00
Jun 10 19:29:40 localhost kernel: Call Trace:
Jun 10 19:29:40 localhost kernel: [<c0188cf8>]
sysfs_get_target_path+0x19/0x59
Jun 10 19:29:40 localhost kernel: [<c0188dfa>] sysfs_getlink+0xc2/0xe9
Jun 10 19:29:40 localhost kernel: [<c0188e47>]
sysfs_follow_link+0x26/0x3e
Jun 10 19:29:40 localhost kernel: [<c0161400>]
link_path_walk+0x8fa/0xba9
Jun 10 19:29:40 localhost kernel: [<c01619c2>] path_lookup+0x144/0x174
Jun 10 19:29:40 localhost kernel: [<c0161b06>] __user_walk+0x21/0x51
Jun 10 19:29:40 localhost kernel: [<c015d0ad>] vfs_stat+0x14/0x3a
Jun 10 19:29:40 localhost kernel: [<c015d6b6>] sys_stat64+0xf/0x23
Jun 10 19:29:40 localhost kernel: [<c02c62a3>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Jun 10 19:29:40 localhost kernel: Code: fe ff ff e8 82 b1 13 00 e9 3a ff
ff ff 90 31 d2 8b 40 24 42 85 c0 75 f8 89 d0 c3 57 89 c2 53 bb 01 00 00
00 8b 3a 31 c0 83 c9 ff <f2> ae f7 d1 49 8b 52 24 8d 5c 0b 01 85 d2 75
e9 89 d8 5b 5f c3
I guess we need to modify the firmware_class.c code to fix it.
Please let me know your opinions.
Thanks
Abhay
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to support nohotplug
2005-06-10 19:45 Abhay_Salunke
@ 2005-06-10 19:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2005-06-10 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abhay_Salunke@dell.com; +Cc: greg, linux-kernel, akpm, Matt_Domsch, ranty
On 6/10/05, Abhay_Salunke@dell.com <Abhay_Salunke@dell.com> wrote:
> I tired to do the following
> 1. echo 0 > /sys/class/firmware/timeout
> 2. modify the firmware.agent by commenting echo -1 when file is not
> present as below.
>
> if [ -f "$FIRMWARE_DIR/$FIRMWARE" ]; then
> echo 1 > $SYSFS/$DEVPATH/loading
> cp "$FIRMWARE_DIR/$FIRMWARE" $SYSFS/$DEVPATH/data
> echo 0 > $SYSFS/$DEVPATH/loading
> else
> # echo -1 > $SYSFS/$DEVPATH/loading
> Fi
> 3. load the dell_rbu driver : see dell_rbu code snipped below
>
> device_initialize(&rbu_device);
>
> strncpy(rbu_device.bus_id,"dell_rbu", BUS_ID_SIZE);
>
I think if you add:
kobject_set_name(&rbu_device.kobj, "%s", rbu_device.bus_id,"dell_rbu");
it will work much better. Also, are you initializing rbu_device with
all 0 to begin with?
--
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* RE: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to support nohotplug
@ 2005-06-09 21:11 Abhay_Salunke
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Abhay_Salunke @ 2005-06-09 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dtor_core, greg; +Cc: linux-kernel, akpm, Matt_Domsch, ranty
> > > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:04:09AM -0500, Abhay_Salunke@Dell.com
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > I think it would be better if you just have request_firmware
and
> > > > > > request_firmware_nowait accept timeout parameter that would
> > > override
> > > > > > default timeout in firmware_class. 0 would mean use default,
> > > > > > MAX_SCHED_TIMEOUT - wait indefinitely.
> > > > >
> > > > > But we still need to avoid hotplug being invoked as we need it
be
> a
> > > > > manual process.
> > > >
> > > > No, hotplug can happen just fine (it happens loads of times
today
> for
> > > > things that people don't care about.)
> > > >
> > > If hotplug happens the complete function is called which makes the
> > > request_firmware return with a failure.
> >
> > If this was true, then the current code would not work at all.
> >
>
> What Abhay is trying to say is that default firmware.agent when it
> does not find requested firmware file writes -1 (abort) to "loading"
> attribute causing firmware_request to fail.
>
> I think it should be fixed in firmware.agent though, not in kernel -
> the agent shoudl just recognoze that sometimes not having firmware
> file is ok.
>
Greg, any inputs on whether we change firmware.agent or we patch
firmware_class.c?
Thanks
Abhay
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* RE: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to support nohotplug
@ 2005-06-08 16:35 Abhay_Salunke
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Abhay_Salunke @ 2005-06-08 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: greg; +Cc: dtor_core, linux-kernel, akpm, Matt_Domsch, ranty
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 11:27 AM
> To: Salunke, Abhay
> Cc: dtor_core@ameritech.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
akpm@osdl.org;
> Domsch, Matt; ranty@debian.org
> Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to
> support nohotplug
>
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:23:30AM -0500, Abhay_Salunke@Dell.com
wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 11:10 AM
> > > To: Salunke, Abhay
> > > Cc: dtor_core@ameritech.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > akpm@osdl.org;
> > > Domsch, Matt; ranty@debian.org
> > > Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c
to
> > > support nohotplug
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:04:09AM -0500, Abhay_Salunke@Dell.com
> > wrote:
> > > > > I think it would be better if you just have request_firmware
and
> > > > > request_firmware_nowait accept timeout parameter that would
> > override
> > > > > default timeout in firmware_class. 0 would mean use default,
> > > > > MAX_SCHED_TIMEOUT - wait indefinitely.
> > > >
> > > > But we still need to avoid hotplug being invoked as we need it
be a
> > > > manual process.
> > >
> > > No, hotplug can happen just fine (it happens loads of times today
for
> > > things that people don't care about.)
> > >
> > If hotplug happens the complete function is called which makes the
> > request_firmware return with a failure.
>
> If this was true, then the current code would not work at all.
Why not? Can't we avoid hotplug from running by not calling
kobject_hotplug()?
If hotplug does not happen we can do the stuff done by hotplug script
manually. And also the current code skips add_timer so not timeouts
irrespective of the timeout specified in /sys/class/firmware/timeout
thus preventing from breaking other's who are using timeout.
Thanks,
Abhay
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* RE: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to support nohotplug
@ 2005-06-08 16:04 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-08 16:09 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Abhay_Salunke @ 2005-06-08 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dtor_core; +Cc: linux-kernel, akpm, Matt_Domsch, greg, ranty
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dmitry Torokhov [mailto:dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 10:56 AM
> To: Salunke, Abhay
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Andrew Morton; Salunke, Abhay;
Domsch,
> Matt; Greg KH; Manuel Estrada Sainz
> Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to
> support nohotplug
>
> On 6/8/05, Abhay Salunke <Abhay_Salunke@dell.com> wrote:
> > This is a patch with modifications in firmware_class.c to have no
> hotplug
> > support.
> ...
>
> > @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static struct class firmware_class = {
> > .name = "firmware",
> > .hotplug = firmware_class_hotplug,
> > .release = fw_class_dev_release,
> > -};
> > +};
>
> Adds trailing whitespace.
> > @@ -364,6 +364,7 @@ fw_setup_class_device(struct firmware *f
> > printk(KERN_ERR "%s: class_device_create_file
failed\n",
> > __FUNCTION__);
> > goto error_unreg;
> > +r
>
> What is this?
> > -out:
> > - return retval;
> > + return _request_firmware(firmware_p, name, device,
> FW_DO_HOTPLUG);
> > }
>
> Tab vs. space identation.
>
> > /* Async support */
> > struct firmware_work {
> > struct work_struct work;
> > - struct module *module;
> > + struct module *module;
> > const char *name;
> > struct device *device;
> > void *context;
> > + int hotplug;
> > void (*cont)(const struct firmware *fw, void *context);
> > };
Will fix it all.
>
> I think it would be better if you just have request_firmware and
> request_firmware_nowait accept timeout parameter that would override
> default timeout in firmware_class. 0 would mean use default,
> MAX_SCHED_TIMEOUT - wait indefinitely.
But we still need to avoid hotplug being invoked as we need it be a
manual process.
Thanks
Abhay
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to support nohotplug
2005-06-08 16:04 Abhay_Salunke
@ 2005-06-08 16:09 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2005-06-08 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abhay_Salunke; +Cc: dtor_core, linux-kernel, akpm, Matt_Domsch, ranty
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:04:09AM -0500, Abhay_Salunke@Dell.com wrote:
> > I think it would be better if you just have request_firmware and
> > request_firmware_nowait accept timeout parameter that would override
> > default timeout in firmware_class. 0 would mean use default,
> > MAX_SCHED_TIMEOUT - wait indefinitely.
>
> But we still need to avoid hotplug being invoked as we need it be a
> manual process.
No, hotplug can happen just fine (it happens loads of times today for
things that people don't care about.)
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to support nohotplug
@ 2005-06-08 15:56 Abhay Salunke
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Abhay Salunke @ 2005-06-08 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, Andrew Morton
Cc: abhay_salunke, matt_domsch, Greg KH, Manuel Estrada Sainz
>> @@ -364,6 +364,7 @@ fw_setup_class_device(struct firmware *f
>> printk(KERN_ERR "%s: class_device_create_file failed\n",
>> __FUNCTION__);
>> goto error_unreg;
>> +r
>> }
> Broken?
Oh! yes, fixed in the following patch
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I have the
right to submit it under the open source license indicated in the file.
Resubmitting after cleaning up spaces/tabs etc...
Signed-off-by: Abhay Salunke <Abhay_Salunke@dell.com>
Thanks,
Abhay Salunke
Software Engineer.
DELL Inc
diff -uprN /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.11.ORIG/drivers/base/firmware_class.c /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.11/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
--- /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.11.ORIG/drivers/base/firmware_class.c 2005-06-08 09:49:57.874162352 -0500
+++ /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.11/drivers/base/firmware_class.c 2005-06-08 10:32:35.581331760 -0500
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static struct class firmware_class = {
.name = "firmware",
.hotplug = firmware_class_hotplug,
.release = fw_class_dev_release,
-};
+};
int
firmware_class_hotplug(struct class_device *class_dev, char **envp,
@@ -376,6 +376,65 @@ out:
return retval;
}
+static int
+_request_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
+ struct device *device, int fw_hotplug)
+{
+ struct class_device *class_dev;
+ struct firmware_priv *fw_priv;
+ struct firmware *firmware;
+ int retval;
+
+ if (!firmware_p)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ *firmware_p = firmware = kmalloc(sizeof (struct firmware), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!firmware) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "%s: kmalloc(struct firmware) failed\n",
+ __FUNCTION__);
+ retval = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ memset(firmware, 0, sizeof (*firmware));
+
+ retval = fw_setup_class_device(firmware, &class_dev, name, device);
+ if (retval)
+ goto error_kfree_fw;
+
+ fw_priv = class_get_devdata(class_dev);
+
+ if ( fw_hotplug == FW_DO_HOTPLUG) {
+ if (loading_timeout) {
+ fw_priv->timeout.expires =
+ jiffies + loading_timeout * HZ;
+ add_timer(&fw_priv->timeout);
+ }
+ kobject_hotplug(&class_dev->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
+ }
+
+ wait_for_completion(&fw_priv->completion);
+ set_bit(FW_STATUS_DONE, &fw_priv->status);
+
+ del_timer_sync(&fw_priv->timeout);
+
+ down(&fw_lock);
+ if (!fw_priv->fw->size || test_bit(FW_STATUS_ABORT, &fw_priv->status)) {
+ retval = -ENOENT;
+ release_firmware(fw_priv->fw);
+ *firmware_p = NULL;
+ }
+ fw_priv->fw = NULL;
+ up(&fw_lock);
+ class_device_unregister(class_dev);
+ goto out;
+
+error_kfree_fw:
+ kfree(firmware);
+ *firmware_p = NULL;
+out:
+ return retval;
+}
+
/**
* request_firmware: - request firmware to hotplug and wait for it
* Description:
@@ -392,56 +451,7 @@ int
request_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
struct device *device)
{
- struct class_device *class_dev;
- struct firmware_priv *fw_priv;
- struct firmware *firmware;
- int retval;
-
- if (!firmware_p)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- *firmware_p = firmware = kmalloc(sizeof (struct firmware), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!firmware) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "%s: kmalloc(struct firmware) failed\n",
- __FUNCTION__);
- retval = -ENOMEM;
- goto out;
- }
- memset(firmware, 0, sizeof (*firmware));
-
- retval = fw_setup_class_device(firmware, &class_dev, name, device);
- if (retval)
- goto error_kfree_fw;
-
- fw_priv = class_get_devdata(class_dev);
-
- if (loading_timeout) {
- fw_priv->timeout.expires = jiffies + loading_timeout * HZ;
- add_timer(&fw_priv->timeout);
- }
-
- kobject_hotplug(&class_dev->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
- wait_for_completion(&fw_priv->completion);
- set_bit(FW_STATUS_DONE, &fw_priv->status);
-
- del_timer_sync(&fw_priv->timeout);
-
- down(&fw_lock);
- if (!fw_priv->fw->size || test_bit(FW_STATUS_ABORT, &fw_priv->status)) {
- retval = -ENOENT;
- release_firmware(fw_priv->fw);
- *firmware_p = NULL;
- }
- fw_priv->fw = NULL;
- up(&fw_lock);
- class_device_unregister(class_dev);
- goto out;
-
-error_kfree_fw:
- kfree(firmware);
- *firmware_p = NULL;
-out:
- return retval;
+ return _request_firmware(firmware_p, name, device, FW_DO_HOTPLUG);
}
/**
@@ -472,14 +482,15 @@ register_firmware(const char *name, cons
* decide if firmware caching is reasonable just leave it as a
* noop */
}
-
+
/* Async support */
struct firmware_work {
struct work_struct work;
- struct module *module;
+ struct module *module;
const char *name;
struct device *device;
void *context;
+ int hotplug;
void (*cont)(const struct firmware *fw, void *context);
};
@@ -493,7 +504,7 @@ request_firmware_work_func(void *arg)
return 0;
}
daemonize("%s/%s", "firmware", fw_work->name);
- request_firmware(&fw, fw_work->name, fw_work->device);
+ _request_firmware(&fw, fw_work->name, fw_work->device, fw_work->hotplug);
fw_work->cont(fw, fw_work->context);
release_firmware(fw);
module_put(fw_work->module);
@@ -501,23 +512,9 @@ request_firmware_work_func(void *arg)
return 0;
}
-/**
- * request_firmware_nowait:
- *
- * Description:
- * Asynchronous variant of request_firmware() for contexts where
- * it is not possible to sleep.
- *
- * @cont will be called asynchronously when the firmware request is over.
- *
- * @context will be passed over to @cont.
- *
- * @fw may be %NULL if firmware request fails.
- *
- **/
-int
-request_firmware_nowait(
- struct module *module,
+static int
+_request_firmware_nowait(
+ struct module *module, int fw_hotplug,
const char *name, struct device *device, void *context,
void (*cont)(const struct firmware *fw, void *context))
{
@@ -528,7 +525,7 @@ request_firmware_nowait(
if (!fw_work)
return -ENOMEM;
if (!try_module_get(module)) {
- kfree(fw_work);
+ kfree(fw_work);
return -EFAULT;
}
@@ -538,6 +535,7 @@ request_firmware_nowait(
.device = device,
.context = context,
.cont = cont,
+ .hotplug = fw_hotplug,
};
ret = kernel_thread(request_firmware_work_func, fw_work,
@@ -550,6 +548,41 @@ request_firmware_nowait(
return 0;
}
+/**
+ * request_firmware_nowait:
+ *
+ * Description:
+ * Asynchronous variant of request_firmware() for contexts where
+ * it is not possible to sleep.
+ *
+ * @cont will be called asynchronously when the firmware request is over.
+ *
+ * @context will be passed over to @cont.
+ *
+ * @fw may be %NULL if firmware request fails.
+ *
+ **/
+int
+request_firmware_nowait(
+ struct module *module,
+ const char *name, struct device *device, void *context,
+ void (*cont)(const struct firmware *fw, void *context))
+{
+ return _request_firmware_nowait(module, FW_DO_HOTPLUG, name,
+ device, context, cont);
+}
+
+int
+request_firmware_nohotplug(
+ struct module *module,
+ const char *name, struct device *device,void *context,
+ void (*cont)(const struct firmware *fw, void *context))
+{
+ return _request_firmware_nowait(module, FW_NO_HOTPLUG_NO_TIMEOUT,
+ name, device, context, cont);
+}
+
+
static int __init
firmware_class_init(void)
{
@@ -568,6 +601,7 @@ firmware_class_init(void)
return error;
}
+
static void __exit
firmware_class_exit(void)
{
@@ -581,3 +615,5 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_firmware);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(request_firmware);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(request_firmware_nowait);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_firmware);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(request_firmware_nohotplug);
+
diff -uprN /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.11.ORIG/include/linux/firmware.h /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.11/include/linux/firmware.h
--- /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.11.ORIG/include/linux/firmware.h 2005-06-08 09:49:57.711187128 -0500
+++ /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.11/include/linux/firmware.h 2005-06-08 09:50:41.714497608 -0500
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#define FIRMWARE_NAME_MAX 30
+#define FW_DO_HOTPLUG (0)
+#define FW_NO_HOTPLUG_NO_TIMEOUT (1)
struct firmware {
size_t size;
u8 *data;
@@ -15,6 +17,11 @@ int request_firmware_nowait(
const char *name, struct device *device, void *context,
void (*cont)(const struct firmware *fw, void *context));
+int request_firmware_nohotplug(
+ struct module *module,
+ const char *name, struct device *device, void *context,
+ void (*cont)(const struct firmware *fw, void *context));
+
void release_firmware(const struct firmware *fw);
void register_firmware(const char *name, const u8 *data, size_t size);
#endif
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to support nohotplug
@ 2005-06-08 15:17 Abhay Salunke
2005-06-08 15:56 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Abhay Salunke @ 2005-06-08 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, Andrew Morton
Cc: abhay_salunke, matt_domsch, Greg KH, Manuel Estrada Sainz
This is a patch with modifications in firmware_class.c to have no hotplug
support.
The current code invokes hotplug script and cannot be controlled manually.
The function request_firmware_nohotplug() is a new addition without
breaking the existing code all the drivers dependent on firmware_class.c
should see no difference.
This fix is required in firmware_class.c to make dell_rbu driver work with
firmware subsystem without having to do any hotplug stuff as per Greg's
suggestion.
The nohotplug function makes the copying of the firmware image a manual
process. Still the steps taken by the hotplug script will now need to be
done manually. The user will need start the copy by first writign 1 to
/sys/class/firmware/xxx/loading and then copy data to
/sys/class/firmware/xxx/data. Finally the copy process ends when the user
copies 0 or -1 to /sys/class/firmware/xxx/loading.
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I have the
right to submit it under the open source license indicated in the file.
Resubmitting after cleaning up spaces/tabs etc...
Signed-off-by: Abhay Salunke <Abhay_Salunke@dell.com>
Thanks,
Abhay Salunke
Software Engineer.
DELL Inc
diff -uprN /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.11.ORIG/drivers/base/firmware_class.c /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.11/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
--- /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.11.ORIG/drivers/base/firmware_class.c 2005-06-08 09:49:57.874162352 -0500
+++ /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.11/drivers/base/firmware_class.c 2005-06-08 09:51:43.051173016 -0500
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static struct class firmware_class = {
.name = "firmware",
.hotplug = firmware_class_hotplug,
.release = fw_class_dev_release,
-};
+};
int
firmware_class_hotplug(struct class_device *class_dev, char **envp,
@@ -364,6 +364,7 @@ fw_setup_class_device(struct firmware *f
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: class_device_create_file failed\n",
__FUNCTION__);
goto error_unreg;
+r
}
set_bit(FW_STATUS_READY, &fw_priv->status);
@@ -376,6 +377,65 @@ out:
return retval;
}
+static int
+_request_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
+ struct device *device, int fw_hotplug)
+{
+ struct class_device *class_dev;
+ struct firmware_priv *fw_priv;
+ struct firmware *firmware;
+ int retval;
+
+ if (!firmware_p)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ *firmware_p = firmware = kmalloc(sizeof (struct firmware), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!firmware) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "%s: kmalloc(struct firmware) failed\n",
+ __FUNCTION__);
+ retval = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ memset(firmware, 0, sizeof (*firmware));
+
+ retval = fw_setup_class_device(firmware, &class_dev, name, device);
+ if (retval)
+ goto error_kfree_fw;
+
+ fw_priv = class_get_devdata(class_dev);
+
+ if ( fw_hotplug == FW_DO_HOTPLUG) {
+ if (loading_timeout) {
+ fw_priv->timeout.expires =
+ jiffies + loading_timeout * HZ;
+ add_timer(&fw_priv->timeout);
+ }
+ kobject_hotplug(&class_dev->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
+ }
+
+ wait_for_completion(&fw_priv->completion);
+ set_bit(FW_STATUS_DONE, &fw_priv->status);
+
+ del_timer_sync(&fw_priv->timeout);
+
+ down(&fw_lock);
+ if (!fw_priv->fw->size || test_bit(FW_STATUS_ABORT, &fw_priv->status)) {
+ retval = -ENOENT;
+ release_firmware(fw_priv->fw);
+ *firmware_p = NULL;
+ }
+ fw_priv->fw = NULL;
+ up(&fw_lock);
+ class_device_unregister(class_dev);
+ goto out;
+
+error_kfree_fw:
+ kfree(firmware);
+ *firmware_p = NULL;
+out:
+ return retval;
+}
+
/**
* request_firmware: - request firmware to hotplug and wait for it
* Description:
@@ -392,56 +452,7 @@ int
request_firmware(const struct firmware **firmware_p, const char *name,
struct device *device)
{
- struct class_device *class_dev;
- struct firmware_priv *fw_priv;
- struct firmware *firmware;
- int retval;
-
- if (!firmware_p)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- *firmware_p = firmware = kmalloc(sizeof (struct firmware), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!firmware) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "%s: kmalloc(struct firmware) failed\n",
- __FUNCTION__);
- retval = -ENOMEM;
- goto out;
- }
- memset(firmware, 0, sizeof (*firmware));
-
- retval = fw_setup_class_device(firmware, &class_dev, name, device);
- if (retval)
- goto error_kfree_fw;
-
- fw_priv = class_get_devdata(class_dev);
-
- if (loading_timeout) {
- fw_priv->timeout.expires = jiffies + loading_timeout * HZ;
- add_timer(&fw_priv->timeout);
- }
-
- kobject_hotplug(&class_dev->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
- wait_for_completion(&fw_priv->completion);
- set_bit(FW_STATUS_DONE, &fw_priv->status);
-
- del_timer_sync(&fw_priv->timeout);
-
- down(&fw_lock);
- if (!fw_priv->fw->size || test_bit(FW_STATUS_ABORT, &fw_priv->status)) {
- retval = -ENOENT;
- release_firmware(fw_priv->fw);
- *firmware_p = NULL;
- }
- fw_priv->fw = NULL;
- up(&fw_lock);
- class_device_unregister(class_dev);
- goto out;
-
-error_kfree_fw:
- kfree(firmware);
- *firmware_p = NULL;
-out:
- return retval;
+ return _request_firmware(firmware_p, name, device, FW_DO_HOTPLUG);
}
/**
@@ -472,14 +483,15 @@ register_firmware(const char *name, cons
* decide if firmware caching is reasonable just leave it as a
* noop */
}
-
+
/* Async support */
struct firmware_work {
struct work_struct work;
- struct module *module;
+ struct module *module;
const char *name;
struct device *device;
void *context;
+ int hotplug;
void (*cont)(const struct firmware *fw, void *context);
};
@@ -493,7 +505,7 @@ request_firmware_work_func(void *arg)
return 0;
}
daemonize("%s/%s", "firmware", fw_work->name);
- request_firmware(&fw, fw_work->name, fw_work->device);
+ _request_firmware(&fw, fw_work->name, fw_work->device, fw_work->hotplug);
fw_work->cont(fw, fw_work->context);
release_firmware(fw);
module_put(fw_work->module);
@@ -501,23 +513,9 @@ request_firmware_work_func(void *arg)
return 0;
}
-/**
- * request_firmware_nowait:
- *
- * Description:
- * Asynchronous variant of request_firmware() for contexts where
- * it is not possible to sleep.
- *
- * @cont will be called asynchronously when the firmware request is over.
- *
- * @context will be passed over to @cont.
- *
- * @fw may be %NULL if firmware request fails.
- *
- **/
-int
-request_firmware_nowait(
- struct module *module,
+static int
+_request_firmware_nowait(
+ struct module *module, int fw_hotplug,
const char *name, struct device *device, void *context,
void (*cont)(const struct firmware *fw, void *context))
{
@@ -528,7 +526,7 @@ request_firmware_nowait(
if (!fw_work)
return -ENOMEM;
if (!try_module_get(module)) {
- kfree(fw_work);
+ kfree(fw_work);
return -EFAULT;
}
@@ -538,6 +536,7 @@ request_firmware_nowait(
.device = device,
.context = context,
.cont = cont,
+ .hotplug = fw_hotplug,
};
ret = kernel_thread(request_firmware_work_func, fw_work,
@@ -550,6 +549,41 @@ request_firmware_nowait(
return 0;
}
+/**
+ * request_firmware_nowait:
+ *
+ * Description:
+ * Asynchronous variant of request_firmware() for contexts where
+ * it is not possible to sleep.
+ *
+ * @cont will be called asynchronously when the firmware request is over.
+ *
+ * @context will be passed over to @cont.
+ *
+ * @fw may be %NULL if firmware request fails.
+ *
+ **/
+int
+request_firmware_nowait(
+ struct module *module,
+ const char *name, struct device *device, void *context,
+ void (*cont)(const struct firmware *fw, void *context))
+{
+ return _request_firmware_nowait(module, FW_DO_HOTPLUG, name,
+ device, context, cont);
+}
+
+int
+request_firmware_nohotplug(
+ struct module *module,
+ const char *name, struct device *device,void *context,
+ void (*cont)(const struct firmware *fw, void *context))
+{
+ return _request_firmware_nowait(module, FW_NO_HOTPLUG_NO_TIMEOUT,
+ name, device, context, cont);
+}
+
+
static int __init
firmware_class_init(void)
{
@@ -568,6 +602,7 @@ firmware_class_init(void)
return error;
}
+r
static void __exit
firmware_class_exit(void)
{
@@ -581,3 +616,5 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_firmware);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(request_firmware);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(request_firmware_nowait);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_firmware);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(request_firmware_nohotplug);
+
diff -uprN /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.11.ORIG/include/linux/firmware.h /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.11/include/linux/firmware.h
--- /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.11.ORIG/include/linux/firmware.h 2005-06-08 09:49:57.711187128 -0500
+++ /usr/src/linux-2.6.11.11/include/linux/firmware.h 2005-06-08 09:50:41.714497608 -0500
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#define FIRMWARE_NAME_MAX 30
+#define FW_DO_HOTPLUG (0)
+#define FW_NO_HOTPLUG_NO_TIMEOUT (1)
struct firmware {
size_t size;
u8 *data;
@@ -15,6 +17,11 @@ int request_firmware_nowait(
const char *name, struct device *device, void *context,
void (*cont)(const struct firmware *fw, void *context));
+int request_firmware_nohotplug(
+ struct module *module,
+ const char *name, struct device *device, void *context,
+ void (*cont)(const struct firmware *fw, void *context));
+
void release_firmware(const struct firmware *fw);
void register_firmware(const char *name, const u8 *data, size_t size);
#endif
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to support nohotplug
2005-06-08 15:17 Abhay Salunke
@ 2005-06-08 15:56 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-06-08 16:02 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2005-06-08 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abhay Salunke
Cc: linux-kernel, Andrew Morton, abhay_salunke, matt_domsch, Greg KH,
Manuel Estrada Sainz
On 6/8/05, Abhay Salunke <Abhay_Salunke@dell.com> wrote:
> This is a patch with modifications in firmware_class.c to have no hotplug
> support.
...
> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static struct class firmware_class = {
> .name = "firmware",
> .hotplug = firmware_class_hotplug,
> .release = fw_class_dev_release,
> -};
> +};
Adds trailing whitespace.
> @@ -364,6 +364,7 @@ fw_setup_class_device(struct firmware *f
> printk(KERN_ERR "%s: class_device_create_file failed\n",
> __FUNCTION__);
> goto error_unreg;
> +r
What is this?
> -out:
> - return retval;
> + return _request_firmware(firmware_p, name, device, FW_DO_HOTPLUG);
> }
Tab vs. space identation.
> /* Async support */
> struct firmware_work {
> struct work_struct work;
> - struct module *module;
> + struct module *module;
> const char *name;
> struct device *device;
> void *context;
> + int hotplug;
> void (*cont)(const struct firmware *fw, void *context);
> };
I think it would be better if you just have request_firmware and
request_firmware_nowait accept timeout parameter that would override
default timeout in firmware_class. 0 would mean use default,
MAX_SCHED_TIMEOUT - wait indefinitely.
--
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to support nohotplug
2005-06-08 15:56 ` Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2005-06-08 16:02 ` Greg KH
2005-06-08 16:09 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2005-06-08 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dtor_core
Cc: Abhay Salunke, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton, matt_domsch,
Manuel Estrada Sainz
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:56:19AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On 6/8/05, Abhay Salunke <Abhay_Salunke@dell.com> wrote:
> > @@ -364,6 +364,7 @@ fw_setup_class_device(struct firmware *f
> > printk(KERN_ERR "%s: class_device_create_file failed\n",
> > __FUNCTION__);
> > goto error_unreg;
> > +r
>
> What is this?
Proof he didn't test the code :(
> I think it would be better if you just have request_firmware and
> request_firmware_nowait accept timeout parameter that would override
> default timeout in firmware_class. 0 would mean use default,
> MAX_SCHED_TIMEOUT - wait indefinitely.
Yes and no. Yes in that we should have a timeout value. No in that 0
should be "forever" and we #define the current 10 second value.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to support nohotplug
2005-06-08 16:02 ` Greg KH
@ 2005-06-08 16:09 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-06-08 16:19 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2005-06-08 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH
Cc: Abhay Salunke, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton, matt_domsch,
Manuel Estrada Sainz
On 6/8/05, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:56:19AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On 6/8/05, Abhay Salunke <Abhay_Salunke@dell.com> wrote:
> > > @@ -364,6 +364,7 @@ fw_setup_class_device(struct firmware *f
> > > printk(KERN_ERR "%s: class_device_create_file failed\n",
> > > __FUNCTION__);
> > > goto error_unreg;
> > > +r
> >
> > What is this?
>
> Proof he didn't test the code :(
>
> > I think it would be better if you just have request_firmware and
> > request_firmware_nowait accept timeout parameter that would override
> > default timeout in firmware_class. 0 would mean use default,
> > MAX_SCHED_TIMEOUT - wait indefinitely.
>
> Yes and no. Yes in that we should have a timeout value. No in that 0
> should be "forever" and we #define the current 10 second value.
>
Are you saying that we should rip out of the firmware_class current
timeout attribute? I thought it was a nice to have system-wide defult
that can be adjusted by operator w/o need to recompile anything.
--
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to support nohotplug
2005-06-08 16:09 ` Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2005-06-08 16:19 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2005-06-08 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dtor_core
Cc: Abhay Salunke, linux-kernel, Andrew Morton, matt_domsch,
Manuel Estrada Sainz
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:09:53AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On 6/8/05, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:56:19AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On 6/8/05, Abhay Salunke <Abhay_Salunke@dell.com> wrote:
> > > > @@ -364,6 +364,7 @@ fw_setup_class_device(struct firmware *f
> > > > printk(KERN_ERR "%s: class_device_create_file failed\n",
> > > > __FUNCTION__);
> > > > goto error_unreg;
> > > > +r
> > >
> > > What is this?
> >
> > Proof he didn't test the code :(
> >
> > > I think it would be better if you just have request_firmware and
> > > request_firmware_nowait accept timeout parameter that would override
> > > default timeout in firmware_class. 0 would mean use default,
> > > MAX_SCHED_TIMEOUT - wait indefinitely.
> >
> > Yes and no. Yes in that we should have a timeout value. No in that 0
> > should be "forever" and we #define the current 10 second value.
> >
>
> Are you saying that we should rip out of the firmware_class current
> timeout attribute?
Change it from being a global to local to the firmware device?
> I thought it was a nice to have system-wide defult that can be
> adjusted by operator w/o need to recompile anything.
But (as recent udev bugs have proven) no one ever changes that default
value :(
In the end, I don't really care either way. All I would like to see is
for there to be a timeout value for the function calls like you state
above.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-10 19:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-06-08 16:23 [patch 2.6.12-rc3] modifications in firmware_class.c to support nohotplug Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-08 16:26 ` Greg KH
2005-06-08 17:06 ` Dmitry Torokhov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-10 19:45 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-10 19:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-06-09 21:11 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-08 16:35 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-08 16:04 Abhay_Salunke
2005-06-08 16:09 ` Greg KH
2005-06-08 15:56 Abhay Salunke
2005-06-08 15:17 Abhay Salunke
2005-06-08 15:56 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-06-08 16:02 ` Greg KH
2005-06-08 16:09 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-06-08 16:19 ` Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox