From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: mat@mut38-1-82-67-62-65.fbx.proxad.net,
matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@free.fr>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: device_remove_file and disconnect
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:36:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d120d50005063013366a96cb99@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050630170406.GA11334@kroah.com>
On 6/30/05, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 09:26:43AM +0200, mat@mut38-1-82-67-62-65.fbx.proxad.net wrote:
>
> > > Again, any specific place in the kernel that you see not doing this?
> > I believe some drivers expected that sysfs read/write callback are always
> > called when the device is plugged so they don't check if
> > to_usb_interface/usb_get_intfdata return valid pointer.
>
> Then they should be fixed. Any specific examples?
>
A lot of USB drivers implement sysfs attributes and then to something like this:
static ssize_t show_tabletProductId(struct device *dev, char *buf)
{
struct aiptek *aiptek = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
if (aiptek == NULL)
return 0;
return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "0x%04x\n",
aiptek->inputdev->id.product);
}
aiptek structure is freed in aiptek_disconnect. It is possible that
CPU1 just passed that aiptek==NULL check and the task gets
rescheduled. Second CPU will do disconnect and kfree(aiptek).
You really need a semaphore in USB driver core to make sure that
device is not taken from you and that the driver that is bound to the
device is still the same.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-30 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-29 16:59 device_remove_file and disconnect matthieu castet
2005-06-29 18:46 ` Greg KH
2005-06-29 20:17 ` matthieu castet
2005-06-29 22:42 ` Greg KH
2005-06-30 7:26 ` mat
2005-06-30 17:04 ` Greg KH
2005-06-30 20:31 ` matthieu castet
2005-07-02 23:27 ` matthieu castet
2005-07-03 4:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-07-25 1:54 ` Greg KH
2005-06-30 20:36 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2005-07-03 4:38 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d120d50005063013366a96cb99@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=castet.matthieu@free.fr \
--cc=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mat@mut38-1-82-67-62-65.fbx.proxad.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox