From: Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@nvidia.com>
To: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Cc: jgg@ziepe.ca, leon@kernel.org, dsahern@gmail.com,
stephen@networkplumber.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, huangjunxian6@hisilicon.com,
michaelgur@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 2/3] rdma: Add an option to set privileged QKEY parameter
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 12:22:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d1b8b5b4-d9ae-ca88-4372-e62988998634@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87il72aiqm.fsf@nvidia.com>
On 10/19/2023 1:38 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
> Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@nvidia.com> writes:
>
>> @@ -40,6 +45,22 @@ static int sys_show_parse_cb(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh, void *data)
>> mode_str);
>> }
>>
>> + if (tb[RDMA_NLDEV_SYS_ATTR_PRIVILEGED_QKEY_MODE]) {
>> + const char *pqkey_str;
>> + uint8_t pqkey_mode;
>> +
>> + pqkey_mode =
>> + mnl_attr_get_u8(tb[RDMA_NLDEV_SYS_ATTR_PRIVILEGED_QKEY_MODE]);
>> +
>> + if (pqkey_mode < ARRAY_SIZE(privileged_qkey_str))
>> + pqkey_str = privileged_qkey_str[pqkey_mode];
>> + else
>> + pqkey_str = "unknown";
>> +
>> + print_color_string(PRINT_ANY, COLOR_NONE, "privileged-qkey",
>> + "privileged-qkey %s ", pqkey_str);
>> + }
>> +
> Elsewhere in the file, you just use print_color_on_off(), why not here?
About this as I previously answered I don't really see a big difference
between it and "print_color_string" but if the
maintainer thinks this is an essential change I can fix and re-send.
Thanks for the review.
>
>> if (tb[RDMA_NLDEV_SYS_ATTR_COPY_ON_FORK])
>> cof = mnl_attr_get_u8(tb[RDMA_NLDEV_SYS_ATTR_COPY_ON_FORK]);
>>
>> @@ -111,10 +155,25 @@ static int sys_set_netns_args(struct rd *rd)
>> return sys_set_netns_cmd(rd, cmd);
>> }
>>
>> +static int sys_set_privileged_qkey_args(struct rd *rd)
>> +{
>> + bool cmd;
>> +
>> + if (rd_no_arg(rd) || !sys_valid_privileged_qkey_cmd(rd_argv(rd))) {
>> + pr_err("valid options are: { on | off }\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
> This could use parse_on_off().
More importantly I looked a bit more into it, and I prefer not to use
it, it would also lead to additional error prints that are not
consistent with what we previously had for this API, so I prefer to keep
it as is , so that the error messages for all arguments of this command
be identical.
>
>> +
>> + cmd = (strcmp(rd_argv(rd), "on") == 0) ? true : false;
>> +
>> + return sys_set_privileged_qkey_cmd(rd, cmd);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int sys_set_help(struct rd *rd)
>> {
>> pr_out("Usage: %s system set [PARAM] value\n", rd->filename);
>> pr_out(" system set netns { shared | exclusive }\n");
>> + pr_out(" system set privileged-qkey { on | off }\n");
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -124,6 +183,7 @@ static int sys_set(struct rd *rd)
>> { NULL, sys_set_help },
>> { "help", sys_set_help },
>> { "netns", sys_set_netns_args},
>> + { "privileged-qkey", sys_set_privileged_qkey_args},
>> { 0 }
>> };
> The rest of the code looks sane to me, but I'm not familiar with the
> feature.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-22 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-19 8:21 [PATCH iproute2-next 0/3] Add support to set privileged qkey parameter Patrisious Haddad
2023-10-19 8:21 ` [PATCH iproute2-next 1/3] rdma: update uapi headers Patrisious Haddad
2023-10-19 8:21 ` [PATCH iproute2-next 2/3] rdma: Add an option to set privileged QKEY parameter Patrisious Haddad
2023-10-19 10:38 ` Petr Machata
2023-10-19 15:05 ` David Ahern
2023-10-22 7:41 ` Patrisious Haddad
2023-10-22 16:48 ` David Ahern
2023-10-23 11:24 ` Patrisious Haddad
2023-10-22 9:22 ` Patrisious Haddad [this message]
2023-10-19 8:21 ` [PATCH iproute2-next 3/3] rdma: Adjust man page for rdma system set privileged_qkey command Patrisious Haddad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d1b8b5b4-d9ae-ca88-4372-e62988998634@nvidia.com \
--to=phaddad@nvidia.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=huangjunxian6@hisilicon.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=michaelgur@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox