From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752610AbdBJKtf (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Feb 2017 05:49:35 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:54483 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751699AbdBJKtd (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Feb 2017 05:49:33 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,140,1484035200"; d="scan'208";a="932323472" Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Fix regression when dynamic TAR update is disabled To: Suravee Suthikulpanit , "De Marchi, Lucas" , "mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com" , "andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com" , "Nehal-Bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com" References: <1486669851-25632-1-git-send-email-Nehal-Bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com> <1486670858.2133.436.camel@linux.intel.com> <1486676048.14478.4.camel@intel.com> <110f9081-ddba-82c2-6ba3-f92bc36d0bc3@amd.com> Cc: "wsa@the-dreams.de" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , "Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com" From: Jarkko Nikula Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:48:57 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <110f9081-ddba-82c2-6ba3-f92bc36d0bc3@amd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10.02.2017 08:38, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: > At this points, my understanding is there are probably two options here: > > 1) Keep the commit 63d0f0a6952a (i2c: designware: detect when dynamic > tar update > is possible) and apply V2 of this patch in 4.10. We might need to > back-port the change > to v4.9 stable as well. > > 2) Revert the 63d0f0a6952a (i2c: designware: detect when dynamic tar > update is possible) in 4.10, > and also in v4.9 stable as well. > I'm fine with both options. Maybe revert as commit 0317e6c0f1dc ("i2c: designware: do not disable adapter after transfer") was also reverted and this revert doesn't seem to cause conflicts. -- Jarkko