From: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
To: 'Dongli Zhang' <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
"jgross@suse.com" <jgross@suse.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
"konrad.wilk@oracle.com" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
"srinivas.eeda@oracle.com" <srinivas.eeda@oracle.com>
Subject: RE: Introduce xenwatch multithreading (mtwatch)
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 08:16:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d22e093ccb8c441ba81c68ebcbb6bbef@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1536910456-13337-1-git-send-email-dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dongli Zhang [mailto:dongli.zhang@oracle.com]
> Sent: 14 September 2018 08:34
> To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com; jgross@suse.com; Paul Durrant
> <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>; Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>;
> konrad.wilk@oracle.com; Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>;
> srinivas.eeda@oracle.com
> Subject: Introduce xenwatch multithreading (mtwatch)
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch set introduces xenwatch multithreading (mtwatch) based on the
> below xen summit 2018 design session notes:
Ah, here is the cover letter... just not labelled 0/6.
>
> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2018-07/msg00017.html
>
>
> xenwatch_thread is a single kernel thread processing the callback function
> for subscribed xenwatch events successively. The xenwatch is stalled in
> 'D'
> state if any of callback function is stalled and uninterruptible.
>
> The domU
I think you should use 'frontend'. It is perfectly possible that a frontend could run in dom0m if, say, the system were using a driver domain.
> create/destroy is failed if xenwatch is stalled in 'D' state as
> the paravirtual driver init/uninit cannot complete. Usually, the only
> option is to reboot dom0 server unless there is solution/workaround to
Similarly 'backend' instead of 'dom0', pointing out that this is bad because it is normal for a single backend domain to serve multiple frontend domains, and the PV protocol is not (yet) re-startable if a backend goes away.
Paul
> move forward and complete the stalled xenwatch event callback function.
> Below is the output of 'xl create' when xenwatch is stalled (the issue is
> reproduced on purpose by hooking netif_receive_skb() to intercept an
> sk_buff sent out from vifX.Y on dom0 with patch at
> https://github.com/finallyjustice/patchset/blob/master/xenwatch-stall-by-
> vif.patch):
>
> # xl create pv.cfg
> Parsing config from pv.cfg
> libxl: error: libxl_device.c:1080:device_backend_callback: Domain 2:unable
> to add device with path /local/domain/0/backend/vbd/2/51712
> libxl: error: libxl_create.c:1278:domcreate_launch_dm: Domain 2:unable to
> add disk devices
> libxl: error: libxl_device.c:1080:device_backend_callback: Domain 2:unable
> to remove device with path /local/domain/0/backend/vbd/2/51712
> libxl: error: libxl_domain.c:1073:devices_destroy_cb: Domain
> 2:libxl__devices_destroy failed
> libxl: error: libxl_domain.c:1000:libxl__destroy_domid: Domain 2:Non-
> existant domain
> libxl: error: libxl_domain.c:959:domain_destroy_callback: Domain 2:Unable
> to destroy guest
> libxl: error: libxl_domain.c:886:domain_destroy_cb: Domain 2:Destruction
> of domain failed
>
>
> The idea of this patch set is to create a per-domU xenwatch thread for
> each
> domid. The per-domid thread is created when the 1st pv backend device (for
> this domid and with xenwatch multithreading enabled) is created, while
> this
> thread is destroyed when the last pv backend device (for this domid and
> with xenwatch multithreading enabled) is removed. Per-domid xs_watch_event
> is never put on the default event list, but is put on the per-domid event
> list directly.
>
>
> For more details, please refer to the xen summit 2018 design session notes
> and presentation slides:
>
> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2018-07/msg00017.html
> http://www.donglizhang.org/xenwatch_multithreading.pdf
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Dongli Zhang (6):
> xenbus: prepare data structures and parameter for xenwatch
> multithreading
> xenbus: implement the xenwatch multithreading framework
> xenbus: dispatch per-domU watch event to per-domU xenwatch thread
> xenbus: process otherend_watch event at 'state' entry in xenwatch
> multithreading
> xenbus: process be_watch events in xenwatch multithreading
> drivers: enable xenwatch multithreading for xen-netback and xen-
> blkback driver
>
> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 3 +
> drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c | 3 +-
> drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 1 +
> drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c | 24 +-
> drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_backend.c | 32 +++
> drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c | 357
> +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/xen/xenbus.h | 70 +++++
> 7 files changed, 484 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> Dongli Zhang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-14 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-14 7:34 Introduce xenwatch multithreading (mtwatch) Dongli Zhang
2018-09-14 7:34 ` [PATCH 1/6] xenbus: prepare data structures and parameter for xenwatch multithreading Dongli Zhang
2018-09-14 8:11 ` Paul Durrant
2018-09-14 13:40 ` [Xen-devel] " Dongli Zhang
2018-09-14 8:32 ` Juergen Gross
2018-09-14 13:57 ` [Xen-devel] " Dongli Zhang
2018-09-14 14:10 ` Juergen Gross
2018-09-16 20:17 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2018-09-17 1:20 ` Dongli Zhang
2018-09-17 19:08 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2018-09-25 5:14 ` Dongli Zhang
2018-09-25 20:19 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2018-09-26 2:57 ` [Xen-devel] " Dongli Zhang
2018-09-14 7:34 ` [PATCH 2/6] xenbus: implement the xenwatch multithreading framework Dongli Zhang
2018-09-14 8:45 ` Paul Durrant
2018-09-14 14:09 ` [Xen-devel] " Dongli Zhang
2018-09-14 8:56 ` Juergen Gross
2018-09-16 21:20 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2018-09-17 1:48 ` [Xen-devel] " Dongli Zhang
2018-09-17 20:00 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2018-09-14 7:34 ` [PATCH 3/6] xenbus: dispatch per-domU watch event to per-domU xenwatch thread Dongli Zhang
2018-09-14 9:01 ` Juergen Gross
2018-09-17 20:09 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2018-09-14 7:34 ` [PATCH 4/6] xenbus: process otherend_watch event at 'state' entry in xenwatch multithreading Dongli Zhang
2018-09-14 9:04 ` Juergen Gross
2018-09-14 7:34 ` [PATCH 5/6] xenbus: process be_watch events " Dongli Zhang
2018-09-14 9:12 ` Juergen Gross
2018-09-14 14:18 ` [Xen-devel] " Dongli Zhang
2018-09-14 14:26 ` Juergen Gross
2018-09-14 14:29 ` Dongli Zhang
2018-09-14 14:44 ` Juergen Gross
2018-09-19 6:15 ` Dongli Zhang
2018-09-19 8:01 ` Juergen Gross
2018-09-19 12:27 ` Dongli Zhang
2018-09-19 12:44 ` Juergen Gross
2018-09-14 14:33 ` Dongli Zhang
2018-09-14 7:34 ` [PATCH 6/6] drivers: enable xenwatch multithreading for xen-netback and xen-blkback driver Dongli Zhang
2018-09-14 9:16 ` Juergen Gross
2018-09-14 9:38 ` Wei Liu
2018-09-14 9:56 ` Roger Pau Monné
2018-09-14 8:16 ` Paul Durrant [this message]
2018-09-14 9:18 ` Introduce xenwatch multithreading (mtwatch) Juergen Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d22e093ccb8c441ba81c68ebcbb6bbef@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net \
--to=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=srinivas.eeda@oracle.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).