From: Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yunke Cao <yunkec@google.com>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] media: uvcvideo: Fix sequence number when no EOF
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 17:17:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d333a55a-c66e-4779-9e0e-b077eb4063df@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260324002022.GC2334070@killaraus.ideasonboard.com>
Hi,
On 24-Mar-26 01:20, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 09:53:52AM +0000, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
>> If the driver could not detect the EOF, the sequence number is increased
>> twice:
>> 1) When we enter uvc_video_decode_start() with the old buffer and FID has
>> flipped => We return -EAGAIN and last_fid is not flipped
>> 2) When we enter uvc_video_decode_start() with the new buffer.
>>
>> Fix this issue by moving the new frame detection logic earlier in
>> uvc_video_decode_start().
>>
>> This also has some nice side affects:
>>
>> - The error status from the new packet will no longer get propagated
>> to the previous frame-buffer.
>> - uvc_video_clock_decode() will no longer update the previous frame
>> buf->stf with info from the new packet.
>> - uvc_video_clock_decode() and uvc_video_stats_decode() will no longer
>> get called twice for the same packet.
>>
>> Cc: stable@kernel.org
>> Fixes: 650b95feee35 ("[media] uvcvideo: Generate discontinuous sequence numbers when frames are lost")
>> Reported-by: Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/CANiDSCuj4cPuB5_v2xyvAagA5FjoN8V5scXiFFOeD3aKDMqkCg@mail.gmail.com/T/#me39fb134e8c2c085567a31548c3403eb639625e4
>> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
>> index 40c76c051da2..eddb4821b205 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
>> @@ -1168,6 +1168,53 @@ static int uvc_video_decode_start(struct uvc_streaming *stream,
>> header_len = data[0];
>> fid = data[1] & UVC_STREAM_FID;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Mark the buffer as done if we're at the beginning of a new frame.
>> + * End of frame detection is better implemented by checking the EOF
>> + * bit (FID bit toggling is delayed by one frame compared to the EOF
>> + * bit), but some devices don't set the bit at end of frame (and the
>> + * last payload can be lost anyway). We thus must check if the FID has
>> + * been toggled.
>> + *
>> + * stream->last_fid is initialized to -1, and buf->bytesused to 0,
>> + * so the first isochronous frame will never trigger an end of frame
>> + * detection.
>> + *
>> + * Empty buffers (bytesused == 0) don't trigger end of frame detection
>> + * as it doesn't make sense to return an empty buffer. This also
>> + * avoids detecting end of frame conditions at FID toggling if the
>> + * previous payload had the EOF bit set.
>> + */
>> + if (fid != stream->last_fid && buf && buf->bytesused != 0) {
>> + uvc_dbg(stream->dev, FRAME,
>> + "Frame complete (FID bit toggled)\n");
>> + buf->state = UVC_BUF_STATE_READY;
>> +
>> + return -EAGAIN;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Some cameras, when running two parallel streams (one MJPEG alongside
>> + * another non-MJPEG stream), are known to lose the EOF packet for a frame.
>> + * We can detect the end of a frame by checking for a new SOI marker, as
>> + * the SOI always lies on the packet boundary between two frames for
>> + * these devices.
>> + */
>> + if (stream->dev->quirks & UVC_QUIRK_MJPEG_NO_EOF &&
>> + (stream->cur_format->fcc == V4L2_PIX_FMT_MJPEG ||
>> + stream->cur_format->fcc == V4L2_PIX_FMT_JPEG)) {
>> + const u8 *packet = data + header_len;
>> +
>> + if (len >= header_len + 2 &&
>> + packet[0] == 0xff && packet[1] == JPEG_MARKER_SOI &&
>> + buf && buf->bytesused != 0) {
>
> How about moving the buf && buf->bytesused != 0 to the outer condition,
> so that we don't inspect the packet when we don't need to ? It will also
> make the two end of frame detection blocks more similar.
I've just merged this into my local uvc/for-next branch and
I've moved the "buf && buf->bytesused != 0" check to the outer condition
while applying, so there is no need to send a new version.
> The patch otherwise looks fine, I don't see anything below this code
> that would need to be performed before.
>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com>
Regards,
Hans
>
>> + buf->state = UVC_BUF_STATE_READY;
>> + buf->error = 1;
>> + stream->last_fid ^= UVC_STREAM_FID;
>> + return -EAGAIN;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> /*
>> * Increase the sequence number regardless of any buffer states, so
>> * that discontinuous sequence numbers always indicate lost frames.
>> @@ -1224,51 +1271,6 @@ static int uvc_video_decode_start(struct uvc_streaming *stream,
>> buf->state = UVC_BUF_STATE_ACTIVE;
>> }
>>
>> - /*
>> - * Mark the buffer as done if we're at the beginning of a new frame.
>> - * End of frame detection is better implemented by checking the EOF
>> - * bit (FID bit toggling is delayed by one frame compared to the EOF
>> - * bit), but some devices don't set the bit at end of frame (and the
>> - * last payload can be lost anyway). We thus must check if the FID has
>> - * been toggled.
>> - *
>> - * stream->last_fid is initialized to -1, so the first isochronous
>> - * frame will never trigger an end of frame detection.
>> - *
>> - * Empty buffers (bytesused == 0) don't trigger end of frame detection
>> - * as it doesn't make sense to return an empty buffer. This also
>> - * avoids detecting end of frame conditions at FID toggling if the
>> - * previous payload had the EOF bit set.
>> - */
>> - if (fid != stream->last_fid && buf->bytesused != 0) {
>> - uvc_dbg(stream->dev, FRAME,
>> - "Frame complete (FID bit toggled)\n");
>> - buf->state = UVC_BUF_STATE_READY;
>> - return -EAGAIN;
>> - }
>> -
>> - /*
>> - * Some cameras, when running two parallel streams (one MJPEG alongside
>> - * another non-MJPEG stream), are known to lose the EOF packet for a frame.
>> - * We can detect the end of a frame by checking for a new SOI marker, as
>> - * the SOI always lies on the packet boundary between two frames for
>> - * these devices.
>> - */
>> - if (stream->dev->quirks & UVC_QUIRK_MJPEG_NO_EOF &&
>> - (stream->cur_format->fcc == V4L2_PIX_FMT_MJPEG ||
>> - stream->cur_format->fcc == V4L2_PIX_FMT_JPEG)) {
>> - const u8 *packet = data + header_len;
>> -
>> - if (len >= header_len + 2 &&
>> - packet[0] == 0xff && packet[1] == JPEG_MARKER_SOI &&
>> - buf->bytesused != 0) {
>> - buf->state = UVC_BUF_STATE_READY;
>> - buf->error = 1;
>> - stream->last_fid ^= UVC_STREAM_FID;
>> - return -EAGAIN;
>> - }
>> - }
>> -
>> stream->last_fid = fid;
>>
>> return header_len;
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-30 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-23 9:53 [PATCH v5 0/2] media: uvcvideo: Fixes for frame sequence number Ricardo Ribalda
2026-03-23 9:53 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] media: uvcvideo: Fix sequence number when no EOF Ricardo Ribalda
2026-03-24 0:20 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-03-24 7:23 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2026-03-30 15:17 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2026-03-23 9:53 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] media: uvcvideo: Fix buffer sequence in frame gaps Ricardo Ribalda
2026-03-30 15:31 ` Hans de Goede
2026-03-30 15:34 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] media: uvcvideo: Fixes for frame sequence number Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d333a55a-c66e-4779-9e0e-b077eb4063df@kernel.org \
--to=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=ribalda@chromium.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=yunkec@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox