From: Jes Sorensen <jes@sunsite.dk>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Bob Glamm <glamm@mail.ece.umn.edu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2)
Date: 23 Aug 2001 22:43:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3bsl6tsl9.fsf@lxplus051.cern.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010822030807.N120@pervalidus> <20010823140555.A1077@newton.bauerschmidt.eu.org> <20010823103620.A6965@kittpeak.ece.umn.edu> <20010823085900.F14302@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> <d3k7zutw5y.fsf@lxplus051.cern.ch> <20010823124109.S14302@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> <d3g0aituio.fsf@lxplus051.cern.ch> <20010823131348.Y14302@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net>
In-Reply-To: Tom Rini's message of "Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:13:48 -0700"
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org> writes:
Tom> On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 10:02:07PM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> I am actually much more concerned about bringing up new systems
>> than embedded however it is not uncommon to have very limited space
>> to work in (like 64MB).
Tom> 64mb of space for 'disk' ? You aren't compiling the kernel
Tom> anyhow without some serious mucking around.
You may keep your binaries in flash on system like that.
>> My point is that the transport process of the kernel image is
>> painful. Some of the embedded devices or new systems being brought
>> up may only have serial some do not have network or floppy. This
>> makes it *very* painful to move things around because you have to
>> physically move your disk or similar.
Tom> And you think that trying to transport the kernel srcs + userland
Tom> will save you time in the long run? If you have to physically
Tom> move your disk to initially put userland on, you can put on
Tom> python too. Or go and run the 'freeze' schitt on it and have the
Tom> C version. What kind of 'new' systems are you talking about?
Tom> I'm biased I guess since I'm used to working on documented
Tom> hardware. So documents + time + good hw debugger tend to help
Tom> things along.
What I am saying is that I do *not* want to transport source
etc. every time I want to make a kernel change. And no I *cannot* just
put Python on it if I a) don't have the space or b) haven't brought up
Python on the system yet.
I am not speaking of any new systems I am working on right now, I am
speaking from my experience bringing up systems such as the m68k and
ia64.
Tom> Because with the exception of your unique situation in which you
Tom> have a machine which is stable enough to compile a kernel on and
Tom> develop but can't run python, it's not a problem.
As I have pointed out, it *is* indeed a problem to kernel developers
who are actually working on bringing up systems. Most of the people
who argue in favor of the Python dependency have never tried bringing
up a system.
Jes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-23 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-22 6:08 Will 2.6 require Python for any configuration ? (CML2) =?unknown-8bit?B?RnLpZOlyaWMgTC4gVy4=?= Meunier
2001-08-23 12:05 ` Roland Bauerschmidt
2001-08-23 15:36 ` Bob Glamm
2001-08-23 15:55 ` Disconnect
2001-08-23 18:36 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-23 18:44 ` Disconnect
2001-08-23 19:01 ` David Weinehall
2001-08-23 19:22 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-23 19:02 ` Roland Bauerschmidt
2001-08-23 19:09 ` Rik van Riel
2001-08-23 19:31 ` Disconnect
2001-08-23 22:52 ` John Alvord
2001-08-24 1:51 ` Keith Owens
2001-08-23 15:55 ` Joshua Schmidlkofer
2001-08-23 15:59 ` Tom Rini
2001-08-23 19:26 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-08-23 19:32 ` David Weinehall
2001-08-23 19:41 ` Tom Rini
2001-08-23 19:50 ` Tom Rini
2001-08-23 20:02 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-08-23 20:13 ` Tom Rini
2001-08-23 20:43 ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
2001-08-23 21:12 ` Tom Rini
2001-08-24 4:59 ` Denis Perchine
2001-08-24 6:35 ` Leonid Mamtchenkov
2001-08-24 7:13 ` Denis Perchine
2001-08-24 15:01 ` Mark Hahn
2001-08-24 13:35 ` Ryan W. Maple
2001-08-25 1:14 ` Michael Peddemors
2001-08-24 17:42 ` David Lang
2001-08-23 16:24 ` Roland Bauerschmidt
2001-08-23 17:57 ` Kurt Roeckx
2001-08-24 8:10 ` Matthias Andree
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-08-23 20:41 Samium Gromoff
2001-08-23 20:53 ` Tom Rini
2001-08-25 4:11 ` Ben Ford
2001-08-25 14:51 ` Tom Rini
2001-08-23 20:56 Samium Gromoff
2001-08-23 21:14 ` Tom Rini
2001-08-23 21:08 Rick Hohensee
2001-08-23 21:01 ` Tom Rini
2001-08-23 21:12 Samium Gromoff
2001-08-23 21:32 ` Tom Rini
2001-08-23 21:18 Samium Gromoff
2001-08-23 21:34 ` Tom Rini
2001-08-24 12:59 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-08-24 15:37 ` Tom Rini
2001-08-24 15:42 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-08-24 15:50 ` Tom Rini
2001-08-24 16:03 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-08-23 21:39 Samium Gromoff
[not found] <20010823191423.I14302@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net>
2001-08-24 3:01 ` Rick Hohensee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d3bsl6tsl9.fsf@lxplus051.cern.ch \
--to=jes@sunsite.dk \
--cc=glamm@mail.ece.umn.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox