From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:31:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:31:38 -0400 Received: from smtp3.cern.ch ([137.138.131.164]:36829 "EHLO smtp3.cern.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:31:27 -0400 To: Jack Steiner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] [RFC] /proc/ksyms change for IA64 (fwd) In-Reply-To: <200108021242.HAA02573@fsgi055.americas.sgi.com> From: Jes Sorensen Date: 10 Aug 2001 17:31:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: Jack Steiner's message of "Thu, 2 Aug 2001 07:42:45 -0500 (CDT)" Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Jack" == Jack Steiner writes: Jack> I know that at some point we need to convert to native builds Jack> but right now we dont have sufficient bigsur/lion boxes to do Jack> that. Jack> We have not seen any problems with the compiler we are using - Jack> at least we have not attributed a problem to the compiler. Jack> Should we upgrade to gcc3.0 yet??? Probably not yet. I would stick to gcc-2.96 based on what you can find in Red Hat's (or one of the other distributions') ia64 SRPMS. Jes