From: Jes Sorensen <jes@sunsite.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@caldera.de>
Cc: David Balazic <david.balazic@uni-mb.si>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IBMs LVM ?
Date: 27 Sep 2001 21:36:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3u1xov32k.fsf@lxplus015.cern.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B9E255C.8943D6BB@uni-mb.si> <200109111526.f8BFQLr25266@ns.caldera.de> <20010911115713.D29347@turbolinux.com> <20010911200633.A5816@caldera.de>
In-Reply-To: Christoph Hellwig's message of "Tue, 11 Sep 2001 20:06:33 +0200"
>>>>> "Christoph" == Christoph Hellwig <hch@caldera.de> writes:
Christoph> On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 11:57:13AM -0600, Andreas Dilger
Christoph> wrote:
>> Do you have a specific complaint? The current LVM kernel code
>> isn't all that robust either (and the user-space code is not very
>> pretty).
Christoph> Please take a barf-bag, look at the code, look at the
Christoph> unneded abstrations, look at the uneeded interfaces, look
Christoph> at the code-duplication, look at the over-engineering.
At least the IBM guys seem interested in listening and taking
code/suggestions from the community. There was a fairly productive BOF
at OLS a couple of months ago. Thats a lot more than we can say about
the current LVM.
Jes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-27 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-11 14:53 IBMs LVM ? David Balazic
2001-09-11 15:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-09-11 17:57 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-09-11 18:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-09-11 19:15 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-09-11 19:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-09-27 19:36 ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
2001-09-27 23:03 ` Alan Cox
[not found] <200109142155.f8ELtVi03827@shay.ecn.purdue.edu>
2001-09-20 11:57 ` IBMs LVM? Christoph Hellwig
2001-09-20 16:05 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-09-20 16:12 ` Steven Whitehouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d3u1xov32k.fsf@lxplus015.cern.ch \
--to=jes@sunsite.dk \
--cc=david.balazic@uni-mb.si \
--cc=hch@caldera.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox