RE: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: do not initialise global variables to 0 or NULL

[David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>]

From: Greg KH
> Sent: 02 November 2020 20:11
> 
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 02:43:45PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 1:42 PM Deepak R Varma <mh12gx2825@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Initializing global variable to 0 or NULL is not necessary and should
> > > be avoided. Issue reported by checkpatch script as:
> > > ERROR: do not initialise globals to 0 (or NULL).
> >
> > I agree that this is technically correct, but a lot of people don't
> > seem to know that so we get a lot of comments about this code for the
> > variables that are not explicitly set.  Seems less confusing to
> > initialize them even if it not necessary.  I don't have a particularly
> > strong opinion on it however.
> 
> The kernel coding style is to do it this way.  You even save space and
> time by doing it as well :)

Uninitialised globals end up as 'named common' (variables that are
their own code section - from FORTRAN) until the final link puts
them into the .bss.
Globals initialised to 0 go into the .bss of the object file
being created.

So both end up in the final .bss.

If the code goes into a module you aren't allowed 'common' data
in a module to every global must be initialised.

I'm surprised checkpatch complains.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)