From: Suraj Sonawane <surajsonawane0215@gmail.com>
To: dgilbert@interlog.com
Cc: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+7efb5850a17ba6ce098b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: sg: fix slab-use-after-free Read in sg_release
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 20:00:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4695943-51b8-40f2-bf2c-3a6436081887@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241120125944.88095-1-surajsonawane0215@gmail.com>
On 11/20/24 18:29, Suraj Sonawane wrote:
> Fix a use-after-free bug in `sg_release`,
> detected by syzbot with KASAN:
>
> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in lock_release+0x151/0xa30
> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5838
> __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xe2/0x750 kernel/locking/mutex.c:912
> sg_release+0x1f4/0x2e0 drivers/scsi/sg.c:407
>
> Root Cause:
> In `sg_release`, the function `kref_put(&sfp->f_ref, sg_remove_sfp)`
> is called before releasing the `open_rel_lock` mutex. The `kref_put`
> call may decrement the reference count of `sfp` to zero, triggering
> its cleanup through `sg_remove_sfp`. This cleanup includes scheduling
> deferred work via `sg_remove_sfp_usercontext`, which ultimately frees
> `sfp`.
>
> After `kref_put`, `sg_release` continues to unlock `open_rel_lock` and
> may reference `sfp` or `sdp`. If `sfp` has already been freed, this
> results in a slab-use-after-free error.
>
> Fix:
> The `kref_put(&sfp->f_ref, sg_remove_sfp)` call is moved after unlocking
> the `open_rel_lock` mutex. This ensures:
> - No references to `sfp` or `sdp` occur after the reference count is
> decremented.
> - Cleanup functions such as sg_remove_sfp and sg_remove_sfp_usercontext
> can safely execute without impacting the mutex handling in `sg_release`.
>
> The fix has been tested and validated by syzbot. This patch closes the bug
> reported at the following syzkaller link and ensures proper sequencing of
> resource cleanup and mutex operations, eliminating the risk of
> use-after-free errors in `sg_release`.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+7efb5850a17ba6ce098b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7efb5850a17ba6ce098b
> Tested-by: syzbot+7efb5850a17ba6ce098b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: cc833acbee9d ("sg: O_EXCL and other lock handling ")
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Sonawane <surajsonawane0215@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/sg.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sg.c b/drivers/scsi/sg.c
> index f86be197f..457d54171 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sg.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sg.c
> @@ -393,7 +393,6 @@ sg_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>
> mutex_lock(&sdp->open_rel_lock);
> scsi_autopm_put_device(sdp->device);
> - kref_put(&sfp->f_ref, sg_remove_sfp);
> sdp->open_cnt--;
>
> /* possibly many open()s waiting on exlude clearing, start many;
> @@ -405,6 +404,7 @@ sg_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> wake_up_interruptible(&sdp->open_wait);
> }
> mutex_unlock(&sdp->open_rel_lock);
> + kref_put(&sfp->f_ref, sg_remove_sfp);
> return 0;
> }
>
Hello!
I wanted to follow up on the patch I submitted. I was wondering if you
had a chance to review it and if there are any comments or feedback.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response.
Best regards,
Suraj Sonawane
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-25 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-20 12:59 [PATCH] scsi: sg: fix slab-use-after-free Read in sg_release Suraj Sonawane
2024-11-21 20:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-11-25 14:30 ` Suraj Sonawane [this message]
2024-11-25 17:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-11-26 5:19 ` Suraj Sonawane
2024-12-05 2:17 ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-12-06 6:52 ` Suraj Sonawane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d4695943-51b8-40f2-bf2c-3a6436081887@gmail.com \
--to=surajsonawane0215@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=syzbot+7efb5850a17ba6ce098b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox