public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Reinette Chatre" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
	"Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	"Bill Wendling" <morbo@google.com>,
	"Justin Stitt" <justinstitt@google.com>,
	"Fenghua Yu" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	"Valentin Obst" <kernel@valentinobst.de>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/resctrl: fix clang build warnings related to abs(), labs() calls
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 12:07:57 +0300 (EEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d46b81df-e018-a9bd-1550-31c825c487cf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b88e73ea-d3f6-42d0-b9e0-f97665546178@nvidia.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2772 bytes --]

On Fri, 3 May 2024, John Hubbard wrote:

> On 5/3/24 11:37 AM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> > On 5/3/2024 9:52 AM, John Hubbard wrote:
> > > On 5/3/24 1:00 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2 May 2024, John Hubbard wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
> > > > > b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
> > > > > index d67ffa3ec63a..c873793d016d 100644
> > > > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
> > > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
> > > > > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ show_bw_info(unsigned long *bw_imc, unsigned long
> > > > > *bw_resc, size_t span)
> > > > >          avg_bw_imc = sum_bw_imc / 4;
> > > > >        avg_bw_resc = sum_bw_resc / 4;
> > > > > -    avg_diff = (float)labs(avg_bw_resc - avg_bw_imc) / avg_bw_imc;
> > > > > +    avg_diff = (float)(avg_bw_resc - avg_bw_imc) / avg_bw_imc;
> > > > >        avg_diff_per = (int)(avg_diff * 100);
> > > > >          ret = avg_diff_per > MAX_DIFF_PERCENT;
> > > > 
> > > > But how are these two cases same after your change when you ended up
> > > > removing taking the absolute value entirely?
> > > 
> > > All of the arguments are unsigned integers, so all arithmetic results
> > > are interpreted as unsigned, so taking the absolute value of that is
> > > always a no-op.

(I see there's a better patch posted already but since there are a few 
incorrect claims in this discussion, I'll do for the record type of 
reply.)

This discussion now went to a tangent about the warning. My main point is 
that logic is not correct after removing labs().

I also disagree with the claim that using labs() on unsigned value is 
no-op because labs() takes long so unsigned is just forced into signed 
when calling which is why the warning triggers but it's very misleading 
warning (see below).

> > It does not seem as though clang can see when values have been casted.
> > I tried to do so explicitly with a:
> >   	avg_diff = labs((long)avg_bw_resc - avg_bw_imc) / (float)avg_bw_imc;
>
> The subtraction result will get promoted to an unsigned long, before being
> passed into labs(3).
>
> > But that still triggers:
> > warning: taking the absolute value of unsigned type 'unsigned long' has no
> > effect [-Wabsolute-value]
> 
> As expected, yes.

That error message isn't factually correct:

        unsigned long a = LONG_MAX;
        long b;

        a += 2;
        b = (long)a;
        printf("%llu %lli %lli\n", a, b, labs(a));

Prints (at least when built with gcc):

9223372036854775809 -9223372036854775807 9223372036854775807

labs(LONG_MAX + 1) won't work though since it's not positively presentable 
with long and the value is left untouched.

-- 
 i.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-06  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-03  2:32 [PATCH] selftests/resctrl: fix clang build warnings related to abs(), labs() calls John Hubbard
2024-05-03  8:00 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-05-03 16:52   ` John Hubbard
2024-05-03 18:37     ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-03 19:12       ` John Hubbard
2024-05-03 20:46         ` Reinette Chatre
2024-05-03 22:00           ` John Hubbard
2024-05-06  9:07         ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2024-05-06 17:21           ` John Hubbard
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-05-08 19:02 John Hubbard
2024-05-08 19:39 ` John Hubbard
2024-05-10  9:06 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-05-10 18:01   ` John Hubbard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d46b81df-e018-a9bd-1550-31c825c487cf@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=kernel@valentinobst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox