From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261398AbULTCqS (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:46:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261399AbULTCqS (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:46:18 -0500 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.198]:25673 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261398AbULTCqQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:46:16 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=aLpyOkPZKR/gqescMayN0+ir9mqwNTN6G1fAuLB/TsBOpVbT0ETAIkNGAzOmdWxJlBe+jNwbV10O6elETNg3lNhVweqo6oJBpu2nbhhmiFckummNMyQhufCTwLCPHyo+iwTnFDeVv87Ol3w+b6wAKgkDYj2aPpXyjRq0hUN1uxo= Message-ID: Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:46:15 -0500 From: Joe Reply-To: Joe To: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: 2.6.10-rc3-mm1-V0.7.33-03 and NVidia wierdness, with workaround... Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Ingo Molnar , LKML In-Reply-To: <1103473203.4143.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200412161626.iBGGQ5CI020770@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <1103300362.12664.53.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1103303011.12664.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200412171810.iBHIAQP3026387@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <1103313861.12664.71.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1103320354.3538.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200412172242.iBHMgVav003005@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <1103473203.4143.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:20:03 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 17:42 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > > > Most likely, the fact you have SMP/HT and I'm just on a PREEMPT-UP kernel is > > what's making the difference. There's almost certainly a '#ifdef CONFIG_SMP' > > involved here somehow.... > > Yep! I just compiled my system without SMP and I was able to start up X > with NVidia on my HT laptop (with V0.7.33-04). > > Ingo, do you think this is a bug with NVidia (bad proprietary module) or > might be with something in the RT SMP side? I'll look a little more on > Monday, but if you know of something, let me know. I'm curious to why > it works fine without RT but will not work with RT (and SMP). I > shouldn't say NVidia bug, since it only is a problem with the RT SMP, so > I should say incompatibility w.r.t. RT SMP and NVidia. > > If you are one of those that don't want anything to do with the NVidia > driver, and don't care less if it works or not, let me know that too. > That way I won't bother you with this anymore and will only communicate > with Valdis :-) > > Thanks, > > -- Steve Nope, I've experianced the same problem without SMP. It also appears to be a bug where if make menuconfig is not run after using an old kernel, for some odd reason CONFIG_SPINLOCK_BKL is set to be on. Anyways, I just wanted to reassure you, this is NOT an SMP bug.