From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964851AbVHKACg (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 20:02:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964860AbVHKACf (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 20:02:35 -0400 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.198]:11395 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964851AbVHKACf convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2005 20:02:35 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jY+zov8evHWEUWgNvhQjmHNrtxlxWTswDwHhcP0FX0MKSCuTb7rwZ0BdLrepFGJfaNtmTHiKr480/uh1pbcXR4JDwAUyLI67DVgMWry9ZGqRwZ6/iVsbvhAYwYdDJJCiwl4eYd8+RJNoA1/Bkrm0x/r3xdomlKICx7D+v+uObsI= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 20:02:33 -0400 From: Joe To: Bill Davidsen Subject: Re: remove support for gcc < 3.2 Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <42FA5848.809@tmr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050731222606.GL3608@stusta.de> <20050731.153631.70217457.davem@davemloft.net> <42FA5848.809@tmr.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm for its removal. As for the gcc project "losing its way" consider that 3.4 has quite matured and also has much smaller binary size from 3.3. 4.0 however is still too early in its development to come close to surpassing 3.4. With all the changes and deprications it seems pointless to have to maintain extra code so 3 people can use an obsolete compiler. Something more recent like 3.4 should be used as a bench. Just my two cents.