From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039ABC43334 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 05:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229546AbiFWFLd (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2022 01:11:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39430 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229692AbiFWFK5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2022 01:10:57 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 680622BB0C for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 21:58:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id ay16so19197098ejb.6 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 21:58:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eoUDrMh+erUbdaGJmsTl+ZRL/9QjZmm3J/nLPRs3FRA=; b=pdeYcyzIM/EeuiIsOGwFOug2CFDdImgKiroLQPKSUymMzgHK9YYCTF2BAEsz6plaEM z0t15pKe5c+FRjMrZ4RmmazpMaPT6a1ytZfgwbCxLAmQoceyLHCTouUvmwJhA5HnLfd8 g0xY9rpDI7/aCcCgsX0C9LS/458kRbfPQhI5W+bQK1qtZDxfmMrFWwPLb4GqYV4ZQvu1 zTG2z8MozpRuOheZ0gHBhjs2Z1hN3C6t5GSw1SIwCKmVidLUp60WvgQLkQGS+WORZ3Th dNY1bsxYk6MAH3rTqsmDEhn6DY5QnO4wYb+BCh9wDLUkxKF2zuZGvW9TN2wuc+BElU02 /M/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eoUDrMh+erUbdaGJmsTl+ZRL/9QjZmm3J/nLPRs3FRA=; b=TUvJ1WzqXwNwG0baoqUp+NHgD+gE01ct3BEhn5u1zAVC9x1QTxEzLXWg0dDyRmw3mV Zhivc7Qry4juCzXWy6bpt/iDk+9/kZZZ1hOYzcb0NkNWPS3ib9WFGF9SAETKjqDKdeN7 OOPJtVoLokjpPfSD9P7LBDxl3LaFV7UpW70Ayu2YmHcjNt8/svP8TYLwFnCpIYWNSQiE pUyPptsSEnA2jkXKJLkzBL1fjcUXOKI0iWGk2s8sCn9VtAjRtUPbL2mFS/m6REJb0HBb 4bwDJ0Xueevc6U1dSZ2Ed7o2b+qnF+lTJ+0d+OMwUkmqb+PeXZs95Yi7cWBIu/P3tdmQ Nn7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/Pnb8TevOy1mJXEu9WZa+DzdQmDmVyBrhtDtRmAERx9XVY+IkI G1AIuFbUKBb8NZZN8GsA/Oc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1unO018+yZqKcHgMCl7hjTKn1obDbpp6FC73SYGcurEyYlhY8u1mzBcFu9wOCW10r6IW2/AfQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3f04:b0:6e8:4b0e:438d with SMTP id hq4-20020a1709073f0400b006e84b0e438dmr6341869ejc.391.1655960312999; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 21:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:c7:8f2e:6923:8d97:93cc:4023:b7a9? (p200300c78f2e69238d9793cc4023b7a9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:c7:8f2e:6923:8d97:93cc:4023:b7a9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ff10-20020a1709069c0a00b006fec69696a0sm9970539ejc.220.2022.06.22.21.58.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 21:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 06:58:31 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: combine nested if statements into one Content-Language: en-US To: Chang Yu , Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220623031515.402691-1-marcus.yu.56@gmail.com> From: Philipp Hortmann In-Reply-To: <20220623031515.402691-1-marcus.yu.56@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/23/22 05:15, Chang Yu wrote: > - if (padapter) { > - if (pfree_recv_queue == &precvpriv->free_recv_queue) > - precvpriv->free_recvframe_cnt++; > - } > + if (padapter && pfree_recv_queue == &precvpriv->free_recv_queue) > + precvpriv->free_recvframe_cnt++; Hi tested with: #include int main() { char padapter = 1; int pfree_recv_queue = 256; int free_recv_queue = 256; if (padapter) { if (pfree_recv_queue == free_recv_queue) printf("Executed before patch: precvpriv->free_recvframe_cnt++;\n"); } if (padapter && pfree_recv_queue == free_recv_queue) printf("Executed after patch: precvpriv->free_recvframe_cnt++;\n"); return 0; } Seems to work. But the rules which operation is done first && or == are not too easy. I would prefer to have: if (padapter && (pfree_recv_queue == free_recv_queue)) So it is very easy to read what is evaluated first. But this is just my opinion and does not have to be right. Thanks for your patch. Bye Philipp