From: Patrick McFarland <diablod3@gmail.com>
To: Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Fruhwirth Clemens <clemens@endorphin.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.8-rc3 - BSD licensing
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 06:38:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d577e56904080703386134963a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4114AC9D.B63C00C0@users.sourceforge.net>
Ouch. I knew Linus was right all along. ;)
However, Jari, you can still request people not use your code in a not
legally enforcable way; and I'm sure Linus would have followed that
request. But thankfully, we can use your code, and it's just a moot
point.
On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 13:19:09 +0300, Jari Ruusu
<jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Jari Ruusu wrote:
> > > Linus, you are mixing two completely different rights here;
> > > re-distribution right and re-licensing right.
> >
> > Ehh.. You're wrong.
>
> Yep. I goofed.
>
> > You haven't even read the GPL, have you?
>
> I read it in 1995. Obviously too many years have passed since then.
>
> > So when you claim that the code isn't GPL-compatible, and at the same time
> > claim that we can't re-license it under the GPL, you are very very
> > confused indeed. Either it is GPL-compatible, or it is not. And if it is
> > GPL-compatible, that ABSOLUTELY means that it can be relicensed under the
> > GPL.
>
> Yep. I don't have any other choice here than to permit re-licencing the
> code. My 04-Aug-2004 18:04:46 +0300 posting where I denied re-licencing
> right was completely wrong. I'm sorry about that.
>
> For loop-AES users I uploaded a patch here that updates licenses to be
> GPL-compatible: http://loop-aes.sourceforge.net/updates/aes-GPL.diff
>
>
>
> --
> Jari Ruusu 1024R/3A220F51 5B 4B F9 BB D3 3F 52 E9 DB 1D EB E3 24 0E A9 DD
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || diablod3@gmail.com
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd
all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to
repetitive electronic music." -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-07 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-03 22:09 Linux 2.6.8-rc3 Linus Torvalds
2004-08-04 12:07 ` Jan De Luyck
2004-08-04 12:13 ` Karol Kozimor
2004-08-04 12:40 ` Erik Mouw
2004-08-05 15:10 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2004-08-05 22:19 ` szonyi calin
2004-08-04 12:57 ` Gene Heskett
2004-08-04 12:44 ` Juergen Stuber
2004-08-04 13:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-08-04 15:04 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-08-04 16:00 ` James Morris
2004-08-04 16:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2004-08-04 16:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-08-04 18:19 ` Patrick McFarland
2004-08-04 18:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-05 13:54 ` Patrick McFarland
2004-08-04 21:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-08-04 18:37 ` Linux 2.6.8-rc3 - BSD licensing Fruhwirth Clemens
2004-08-04 18:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-04 19:26 ` Fruhwirth Clemens
2004-08-04 19:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-05 12:33 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-08-05 16:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-05 17:45 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-08-05 20:21 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-05 21:37 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-08-05 21:08 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-06 9:47 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-08-06 16:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-07 10:19 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-08-07 10:38 ` Patrick McFarland [this message]
2004-08-07 17:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-05 12:32 ` Linux 2.6.8-rc3 Jari Ruusu
2004-08-04 16:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-08-05 15:04 ` [PATCH] Drop asm i586 AES code James Morris
2004-08-04 15:08 ` Linux 2.6.8-rc3 (compile stats) John Cherry
2004-08-04 18:52 ` [patch] 2.6.8-rc3: fix modular kernel with gcc 2.95 Adrian Bunk
2004-08-06 19:57 ` 2.6.8-rc3: MPT Fusion compile error with PROC_FS=n Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d577e56904080703386134963a@mail.gmail.com \
--to=diablod3@gmail.com \
--cc=clemens@endorphin.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox