public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>, Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: remove the SLUB_DEBUG functionality and config option
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 13:05:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d5cdcb88-c7ca-4a29-9b8e-3abb7c37726c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260401-b4-are-you-serious-v1-1-dcacda70647d@kernel.org>

On 4/1/26 12:59, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
> The boot-time enabled per-cache debugging has served us well in the
> past, but it's time for it to go, for the following reasons.
> 
> - It's a debugging feature. However, thanks to the advent of LLM-based
>   reviews, we are not adding bugs to the kernel anymore, so it's
>   unnecessary now.

Right, and probably LLM review would find many of bugs in the existing
SLUB_DEBUG code.

> 
> - KASAN is more powerful anyway for the classes of bugs that SLUB_DEBUG
>   can catch. But I suspect KASAN is likely to be removed soon too, see
>   above.

Of course.

> 
> - SLAB never had no such dynamic debugging functionality. With the
>   introduction of sheaves percpu caching, we have turned SLUB back into
>   SLAB partially, so this just follows that direction.
> 
> - It's removing ~2500 lines of code and I want to keep my overal
>   diffstats negative. This adds a nice margin.

Personal stats clearly matter more than anything else.

> 
> Since the slub kunit test depends on SLUB_DEBUG, remove it too. It's not
> a big loss, see the first point above.
> 
> Singed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
> ---
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
> ---
>  lib/Kconfig.debug      |   12 -
>  lib/Kconfig.kasan      |    2 -
>  lib/tests/Makefile     |    1 -
>  lib/tests/slub_kunit.c |  329 --------
>  mm/Kconfig.debug       |   60 --
>  mm/dmapool.c           |    4 -
>  mm/memcontrol-v1.c     |   17 -
>  mm/mempool.c           |  105 ---
>  mm/slab.h              |   34 -
>  mm/slub.c              | 2074 +-----------------------------------------------

slab.h vs. slub.c is annoying.

Can you just rename that to sheaf.c / sheaf.h now while at it?

-- 
Cheers,

David

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-01 11:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-01 10:59 [PATCH] slab: remove the SLUB_DEBUG functionality and config option Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-04-01 11:05 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-04-01 11:19   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-04-01 11:08 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-04-01 11:15 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)
2026-04-01 11:53 ` Harry Yoo (Oracle)
2026-04-01 16:44 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d5cdcb88-c7ca-4a29-9b8e-3abb7c37726c@kernel.org \
    --to=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox