From: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
andy.gross@linaro.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tfiga@chromium.org,
sricharan@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
david.brown@linaro.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu: Error out only if not enough context interrupts
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:09:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6796a00-17da-c03e-ca7f-7a67139ad99a@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180724083633.GA19324@arm.com>
Hi Will,
On 7/24/2018 2:06 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:23:56PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> Currently we check if the number of context banks is not equal to
>> num_context_interrupts. However, there are booloaders such as, one
>> on sdm845 that reserves few context banks and thus kernel views
>> less than the total available context banks.
>> So, although the hardware definition in device tree would mention
>> the correct number of context interrupts, this number can be
>> greater than the number of context banks visible to smmu in kernel.
>> We should therefore error out only when the number of context banks
>> is greater than the available number of context interrupts.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
>> Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
>> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>> index 7c69736a30f8..4cb53bf4f423 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>> @@ -2229,12 +2229,19 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> if (err)
>> return err;
>>
>> - if (smmu->version == ARM_SMMU_V2 &&
>> - smmu->num_context_banks != smmu->num_context_irqs) {
>> - dev_err(dev,
>> - "found only %d context interrupt(s) but %d required\n",
>> - smmu->num_context_irqs, smmu->num_context_banks);
>> - return -ENODEV;
>> + if (smmu->version == ARM_SMMU_V2) {
>> + if (smmu->num_context_banks > smmu->num_context_irqs) {
>> + dev_err(dev,
>> + "found only %d context irq(s) but %d required\n",
>> + smmu->num_context_irqs, smmu->num_context_banks);
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + } else if (smmu->num_context_banks < smmu->num_context_irqs) {
>> + /* loose extra context interrupts */
>> + dev_notice(dev,
>> + "found %d context irq(s) but only %d required\n",
>> + smmu->num_context_irqs, smmu->num_context_banks);
>> + smmu->num_context_irqs = smmu->num_context_banks;
>> + }
> I don't see the utility in the new message. Can you simplify with the patch
> below on top? It's a bit weird that we only decide to ignore the extra irqs
> after calling platform_get_irq() on them, but that seems to be harmless.
Thanks. I will modify as suggested below and respin.
Best regards
Vivek
>
> Will
>
> --->8
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index aa46c1ed5bf9..5349e22b5c78 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -2109,13 +2109,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> "found only %d context irq(s) but %d required\n",
> smmu->num_context_irqs, smmu->num_context_banks);
> return -ENODEV;
> - } else if (smmu->num_context_banks < smmu->num_context_irqs) {
> - /* loose extra context interrupts */
> - dev_notice(dev,
> - "found %d context irq(s) but only %d required\n",
> - smmu->num_context_irqs, smmu->num_context_banks);
> - smmu->num_context_irqs = smmu->num_context_banks;
> }
> +
> + /* Ignore superfluous interrupts */
> + smmu->num_context_irqs = smmu->num_context_banks;
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_global_irqs; ++i) {
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-24 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-19 17:53 [PATCH 0/3] Enable smmu support on sdm845 Vivek Gautam
2018-07-19 17:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] dts: arm64/sdm845: Add node for arm,mmu-500 Vivek Gautam
2018-07-19 23:08 ` Rob Herring
2018-07-20 8:26 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-08-10 22:18 ` Doug Anderson
2018-08-10 22:30 ` Doug Anderson
2018-08-13 5:29 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-07-19 17:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] dts: arm64/sdm845: Add node for qcom,smmu-v2 Vivek Gautam
2018-07-19 17:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu: Error out only if not enough context interrupts Vivek Gautam
2018-07-24 8:36 ` Will Deacon
2018-07-24 9:39 ` Vivek Gautam [this message]
2018-07-25 11:57 ` Will Deacon
2018-07-27 9:57 ` Vivek Gautam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d6796a00-17da-c03e-ca7f-7a67139ad99a@codeaurora.org \
--to=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
--cc=andy.gross@linaro.org \
--cc=david.brown@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox