Re: [PATCH v1 7/7] fpga: dfl: pci: Add generic OFS PCI PID

Tom Rix
2022-02-21T18:21:08Z

On 2/21/22 9:50 AM, matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2022, Tom Rix wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2/18/22 1:03 AM, Zhang, Tianfei wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 12:16 AM
>>>> To: Zhang, Tianfei <tianfei.zhang@intel.com>; Wu, Hao
>>>> <hao.wu@intel.com>;
>>>> mdf@kernel.org; Xu, Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>;
>>>> linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org;
>>>> linux-doc@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>>> Cc: corbet@lwn.net; Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 7/7] fpga: dfl: pci: Add generic OFS PCI PID
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/14/22 3:26 AM, Tianfei zhang wrote:
>>>>> From: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Add the PCI product id for an Open FPGA Stack PCI card.
>>>> Is there a URL to the card ?
>>> This PCIe Device IDs have registered by Intel.
>> A URL is useful to introduce the board, Is there one ?
>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tianfei Zhang <tianfei.zhang@intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c | 4 ++++
>>>>>    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c index
>>>>> 83b604d6dbe6..cb2fbf3eb918 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
>>>>> @@ -76,12 +76,14 @@ static void cci_pci_free_irq(struct pci_dev
>>>>> *pcidev)
>>>>>    #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_PAC_D5005        0x0B2B
>>>>>    #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_SILICOM_PAC_N5010    0x1000
>>>>>    #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_SILICOM_PAC_N5011    0x1001
>>>>> +#define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_OFS        0xbcce
>>>> INTEL_OFS is a generic name, pci id's map to specific cards
>>>>
>>>> Is there a more specific name for this card ?
>>> I think using INTEL_OFS is better, because INTEL_OFS is the Generic
>>> development platform can support multiple cards which using OFS
>>> specification,
>>> like Intel PAC N6000 card.
>>
>> I would prefer something like PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_PAC_N6000 because
>> it follows an existing pattern.  Make it easy on a developer, they
>> will look at their board or box, see X and try to find something
>> similar in the driver source.
>>
>> To use OSF_ * the name needs a suffix to differentiate it from future
>> cards that will also use ofs.
>>
>> If this really is a generic id please explain in the doc patch how
>> every future board with use this single id and how a driver could
>> work around a hw problem in a specific board with a pci id covering
>> multiple boards.
>>
>> Tom
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> The intent is to have a generic device id that can be used with many
> different boards.  Currently, we have FPGA implementations for 3
> different boards using this generic id.  We may need a better name for
> device id than OFS.  More precisely this generic device id means a PCI
> function that is described by a Device Feature List (DFL).  How about
> PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_DFL?
>
> With a DFL device id, the functionality of the PF/VF is determined by
> the contents of the DFL.  Each Device Feature Header (DFH) in the DFL
> has a revision field that can be used identify "broken" hw, or new
> functionality added to a feature.  Additionally, since the DFL is
> typically used in a FPGA, the broken hardware, can and should be fixed
> in most cases.

How is lspci supposed to work ?

A dfl set can change with fw updates and in theory different boards
could have the same set.

Tom

>
> Matthew
>>
>>>
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>>>    /* VF Device */
>>>>>    #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_VF_INT_5_X        0xBCBF
>>>>>    #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_VF_INT_6_X        0xBCC1
>>>>>    #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_VF_DSC_1_X        0x09C5
>>>>>    #define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_PAC_D5005_VF    0x0B2C
>>>>> +#define PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_OFS_VF        0xbccf
>>>>>
>>>>>    static struct pci_device_id cci_pcie_id_tbl[] = {
>>>>>        {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCIE_DEVICE_ID_PF_INT_5_X),},
>>>> @@
>>>>> -95,6 +97,8 @@ static struct pci_device_id cci_pcie_id_tbl[] = {
>>>>>        {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
>>>> PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_PAC_D5005_VF),},
>>>>> {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SILICOM_DENMARK,
>>>> PCIE_DEVICE_ID_SILICOM_PAC_N5010),},
>>>>> {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SILICOM_DENMARK,
>>>>> PCIE_DEVICE_ID_SILICOM_PAC_N5011),},
>>>>> +    {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_OFS),},
>>>>> +    {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
>>>> PCIE_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_OFS_VF),},
>>>>>        {0,}
>>>>>    };
>>>>>    MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, cci_pcie_id_tbl);
>>
>>