The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
	Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
	sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 sched_ext/for-7.3] sched_ext: Bound per-task reenqueues and eject the owning scheduler
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2026 09:49:37 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d70a8f20c1773e0ade93b02272d96ab4@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <amW3rqVgsXHBvj6u@gpd4>

Hello, Andrea.

On Sun, Jul 26, 2026 at 09:30:54AM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > +	if (enq_flags & SCX_ENQ_REENQ) {
> > +		if (++p->scx.reenq_cnt > 1)
> > +			__scx_add_event(sch, SCX_EV_REENQ_REPEAT, 1);
>
> Should we consider only consecutive kernel-driven retry reenqueues here, rather
> than every reenqueue? IIUC, the paths we need to limit are SCX_TASK_REENQ_IMMED
> and SCX_TASK_REENQ_CAP.

I think triggering it on all reenqueues is fine. No matter what, if a task
is getting reenqueued hundreds of times without running, something is going
wrong.

> Should reenq_cnt also be cleared in scx_disable_task(), together with the other
> SCX-managed fields?
>
> Otherwise, the count can survive switching the task to another scheduling class,
> replacing the BPF scheduler, or rehoming it to another sub-scheduler and the
> next owner could then be ejected based on the reenqueues from to the previous
> owner.

Yeah, that makes sense. Updated in v3.

> Documentation/scheduler/sched-ext.rst still uses SCX_EV_REENQ_LOCAL_REPEAT in
> both the sample events output and the counter description.
>
> The description also says that the event is specific to local DSQ reenqueues,
> while SCX_EV_REENQ_REPEAT now covers reenqueues from all sources. Can you update
> those two references as well?

Updated in v3.

Thanks.

--
tejun

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-26 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-25 18:51 [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3] sched_ext: Bound per-task reenqueues and eject the owning scheduler Tejun Heo
2026-07-25 19:05 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2026-07-26  7:30   ` Andrea Righi
2026-07-26 19:49     ` Tejun Heo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d70a8f20c1773e0ade93b02272d96ab4@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox