From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: "Derek J. Clark" <derekjohn.clark@gmail.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>,
Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Rong Zhang <i@rong.moe>, Kurt Borja <kuurtb@gmail.com>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 06/16] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-other: Limit adding attributes to supported devices
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 21:44:23 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d76ead74-30d7-650f-051e-bfec871a4d14@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ABDB1EF-324B-48EB-A5F2-18E13DD9F5B8@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7685 bytes --]
On Tue, 5 May 2026, Derek J. Clark wrote:
> On May 5, 2026 2:48:08 AM PDT, "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >On Thu, 30 Apr 2026, Derek J. Clark wrote:
> >> On April 30, 2026 7:01:55 AM PDT, "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> >On Sun, 12 Apr 2026, Derek J. Clark wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Adds lwmi_is_attr_01_supported, and only creates the attribute subfolder
> >> >> if the attribute is supported by the hardware. Due to some poorly
> >> >> implemented BIOS this is a multi-step sequence of events. This is
> >> >> because:
> >> >> - Some BIOS support getting the capability data from custom mode (0xff),
> >> >> while others only support it in no-mode (0x00).
> >> >> - Some BIOS support get/set for the current value from custom mode (0xff),
> >> >> while others only support it in no-mode (0x00).
> >> >> - Some BIOS report capability data for a method that is not fully
> >> >> implemented.
> >> >> - Some BIOS have methods fully implemented, but no complimentary
> >> >> capability data.
> >> >>
> >> >> To ensure we only expose fully implemented methods with corresponding
> >> >> capability data, we check each outcome before reporting that an
> >> >> attribute can be supported.
> >> >>
> >> >> Checking for lwmi_is_attr_01_supported during remove is not done to
> >> >> ensure that we don't attempt to call cd01 or send WMI events if one of
> >> >> the interfaces being removed was the cause of the driver unloading.
> >> >>
> >> >> Fixes: edc4b183b794 ("platform/x86: Add Lenovo Other Mode WMI Driver")
> >> >> Reported-by: Kurt Borja <kuurtb@gmail.com>
> >> >> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/platform-driver-x86/DG60P3SHXR8H.3NSEHMZ6J7XRC@gmail.com/
> >> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >> >> Reviewed-by: Rong Zhang <i@rong.moe>
> >> >> Tested-by: Rong Zhang <i@rong.moe>
> >> >> Reviewed-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Derek J. Clark <derekjohn.clark@gmail.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> v7:
> >> >> - Move earlier in the series. This required dropping the use of
> >> >> lwmi_attr_id as it will be added later.
> >> >> - Add missing switch between cd_mode_id and cv_mode_id in
> >> >> current_value_store.
> >> >> v6:
> >> >> - Zero initialize args in lwmi_is_attr_01_supported.
> >> >> - Fix formatting.
> >> >> v5:
> >> >> - Move cv/cd_mode_id refrences from path 3/4.
> >> >> - Add missing import for ARRAY_SIZE.
> >> >> - Make lwmi_is_attr_01_supported return bool instead of u32.
> >> >> - Various formatting fixes.
> >> >> v4:
> >> >> - Use for loop instead of backtrace gotos for checking if an attribute
> >> >> is supported.
> >> >> - Add include for dev_printk.
> >> >> - Wrap dev_dbg in lwmi_is_attr_01_supported earlier.
> >> >> - Don't use symmetric cleanup of attributes in error states.
> >> >> ---
> >> >> drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/wmi-gamezone.h | 1 +
> >> >> drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/wmi-other.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++---
> >> >> 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/wmi-gamezone.h b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/wmi-gamezone.h
> >> >> index 6b163a5eeb95..ddb919cf6c36 100644
> >> >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/wmi-gamezone.h
> >> >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/wmi-gamezone.h
> >> >> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ enum gamezone_events_type {
> >> >> };
> >> >>
> >> >> enum thermal_mode {
> >> >> + LWMI_GZ_THERMAL_MODE_NONE = 0x00,
> >> >> LWMI_GZ_THERMAL_MODE_QUIET = 0x01,
> >> >> LWMI_GZ_THERMAL_MODE_BALANCED = 0x02,
> >> >> LWMI_GZ_THERMAL_MODE_PERFORMANCE = 0x03,
> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/wmi-other.c b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/wmi-other.c
> >> >> index 50a03f5fd6ab..29d062a1c6dc 100644
> >> >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/wmi-other.c
> >> >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/wmi-other.c
> >> >> @@ -550,6 +550,8 @@ struct tunable_attr_01 {
> >> >> u8 feature_id;
> >> >> u8 device_id;
> >> >> u8 type_id;
> >> >> + u8 cd_mode_id; /* mode arg for searching capdata */
> >> >> + u8 cv_mode_id; /* mode arg for set/get current_value */
> >> >> };
> >> >>
> >> >> static struct tunable_attr_01 ppt_pl1_spl = {
> >> >> @@ -775,7 +777,6 @@ static ssize_t attr_current_value_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> >> >> struct wmi_method_args_32 args = {};
> >> >> struct capdata01 capdata;
> >> >> enum thermal_mode mode;
> >> >> - u32 attribute_id;
> >> >> u32 value;
> >> >> int ret;
> >> >>
> >> >> @@ -786,13 +787,12 @@ static ssize_t attr_current_value_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> >> >> if (mode != LWMI_GZ_THERMAL_MODE_CUSTOM)
> >> >> return -EBUSY;
> >> >>
> >> >> - attribute_id =
> >> >> - FIELD_PREP(LWMI_ATTR_DEV_ID_MASK, tunable_attr->device_id) |
> >> >> - FIELD_PREP(LWMI_ATTR_FEAT_ID_MASK, tunable_attr->feature_id) |
> >> >> - FIELD_PREP(LWMI_ATTR_MODE_ID_MASK, mode) |
> >> >> - FIELD_PREP(LWMI_ATTR_TYPE_ID_MASK, tunable_attr->type_id);
> >> >> + args.arg0 = FIELD_PREP(LWMI_ATTR_DEV_ID_MASK, tunable_attr->device_id) |
> >> >> + FIELD_PREP(LWMI_ATTR_FEAT_ID_MASK, tunable_attr->feature_id) |
> >> >> + FIELD_PREP(LWMI_ATTR_MODE_ID_MASK, tunable_attr->cd_mode_id) |
> >> >> + FIELD_PREP(LWMI_ATTR_TYPE_ID_MASK, tunable_attr->type_id);
> >> >>
> >> >> - ret = lwmi_cd01_get_data(priv->cd01_list, attribute_id, &capdata);
> >> >> + ret = lwmi_cd01_get_data(priv->cd01_list, args.arg0, &capdata);
> >> >> if (ret)
> >> >> return ret;
> >> >>
> >> >> @@ -803,7 +803,10 @@ static ssize_t attr_current_value_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> >> >> if (value < capdata.min_value || value > capdata.max_value)
> >> >> return -EINVAL;
> >> >>
> >> >> - args.arg0 = attribute_id;
> >> >> + args.arg0 = FIELD_PREP(LWMI_ATTR_DEV_ID_MASK, tunable_attr->device_id) |
> >> >> + FIELD_PREP(LWMI_ATTR_FEAT_ID_MASK, tunable_attr->feature_id) |
> >> >> + FIELD_PREP(LWMI_ATTR_MODE_ID_MASK, tunable_attr->cv_mode_id) |
> >> >> + FIELD_PREP(LWMI_ATTR_TYPE_ID_MASK, tunable_attr->type_id);
> >> >
> >> >It's already repeated a few times and you're adding more in this patch.
> >> >
> >> >We should have a helper function for this encoding as it seems to
> >> >repeat. That is, something that takes tunable_attr and mode as input
> >> >(the conversion of existing entries should be in own patch preceeding
> >> >this fix patch).
> >> >
> >>
> >> Hi Ilpo,
> >>
> >> A function for that is added in patch 10, though it is slightly modified
> >> from that to be more flexible is tunable_attr isn't used (such as with
> >> the fan test attributes)
> >
> >It still leaves some boilerplate having to deref all those tunable_attr
> >fields so perhaps it would be better to do nested helpers, one taking
> >tunable_attr and that calls the more flexible helper. IMO that would be
> >the best approach here.
> >
>
> That's simple enough. I assume that can be added to that same patch
> instead of an additional one?
Yes, adding both of them in the same patch is fine. Otherwise you'd just
be changing the same spots again.
> >> Originally I had that patch preceding any additions, but after
> >> discussing with Rong we felt like it would be easier for stable
> >> backports if all the fixes were upfront. I can certainly move it back
> >> if you still prefer.
> >
> >I see. This patch would be cleaner though if we have the helper already in
> >place but I'm not insisting if you two prefer the current order of the
> >patches.
> >
>
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-12 21:11 [PATCH v10 00/16] lenovo-wmi: Add fixes and enhancement Derek J. Clark
2026-04-12 21:11 ` [PATCH v10 01/16] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-helpers: Fix memory leak in lwmi_dev_evaluate_int() Derek J. Clark
2026-04-12 21:11 ` [PATCH v10 02/16] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-other: Balance IDA id allocation and free Derek J. Clark
2026-04-12 21:11 ` [PATCH v10 03/16] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-other: Balance component bind and unbind Derek J. Clark
2026-04-12 21:11 ` [PATCH v10 04/16] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-other: Zero initialize WMI arguments Derek J. Clark
2026-04-12 21:11 ` [PATCH v10 05/16] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-other: Fix tunable_attr_01 struct members Derek J. Clark
2026-04-12 21:11 ` [PATCH v10 06/16] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-other: Limit adding attributes to supported devices Derek J. Clark
2026-04-30 14:01 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-04-30 14:56 ` Derek J. Clark
2026-04-30 18:10 ` Rong Zhang
2026-05-05 10:25 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-05-05 17:20 ` Rong Zhang
2026-05-05 17:38 ` Derek J. Clark
2026-05-05 18:42 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-05-05 9:48 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-05-05 17:40 ` Derek J. Clark
2026-05-05 18:44 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2026-04-12 21:11 ` [PATCH v10 07/16] platform/x86: lenovo: Decouple lenovo-wmi-gamezone and lenovo-wmi-other Derek J. Clark
2026-04-12 21:11 ` [PATCH v10 08/16] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-helpers: Move gamezone enums to wmi-helpers Derek J. Clark
2026-04-12 21:11 ` [PATCH v10 09/16] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-other: Move LWMI_FAN_DIV Derek J. Clark
2026-04-12 21:11 ` [PATCH v10 10/16] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-other: Add lwmi_attr_id() function Derek J. Clark
2026-04-12 21:11 ` [PATCH v10 11/16] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-other: Add missing CPU tunable attributes Derek J. Clark
2026-04-12 21:11 ` [PATCH v10 12/16] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-other: Add GPU " Derek J. Clark
2026-04-12 21:11 ` [PATCH v10 13/16] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-other: Rename LWMI_OM_FW_ATTR_BASE_PATH Derek J. Clark
2026-04-12 21:11 ` [PATCH v10 14/16] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-other: Add WMI battery charge limiting Derek J. Clark
2026-04-12 21:11 ` [PATCH v10 15/16] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-helpers: Add helper for creating per-device debugfs dir Derek J. Clark
2026-04-12 21:11 ` [PATCH v10 16/16] platform/x86: lenovo-wmi-capdata: Add debugfs file for dumping capdata Derek J. Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d76ead74-30d7-650f-051e-bfec871a4d14@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=W_Armin@gmx.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=derekjohn.clark@gmail.com \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=i@rong.moe \
--cc=kuurtb@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox