public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
	Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>, Xin Li <xin3.li@intel.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/cpufeature: Add feature dependency checks
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 14:47:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d7a86076-d1e8-418f-a167-e2d16b2dd7f7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZszgGxZLDQYIEJpX@google.com>

On 8/26/2024 1:05 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024, Sohil Mehta wrote:
>> But I still feel that for the rare case when something like this seeps
>> through it would be better to disable the feature upfront than run in a
>> kernel panic or some other unexpected behavior.
> 
> Agreed.
> 

Great, I'll wait for a few more days to see if someone says otherwise.


      reply	other threads:[~2024-08-26 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-22 20:22 [RFC PATCH] x86/cpufeature: Add feature dependency checks Sohil Mehta
2024-08-22 23:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-23 19:05   ` Sohil Mehta
2024-08-26 20:05     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-26 21:47       ` Sohil Mehta [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d7a86076-d1e8-418f-a167-e2d16b2dd7f7@intel.com \
    --to=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox