From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Subject: [PATCH 7 of 8] x86: use PTE_MASK rather than ad-hoc mask
Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 12:02:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d7b47c83ea4a433bbbe2.1210330965@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <patchbomb.1210330958@localhost>
Use ~PTE_MASK to extract the non-pfn parts of the pte (ie, the pte
flags), rather than constructing an ad-hoc mask.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
---
include/asm-x86/pgtable.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/pgtable.h b/include/asm-x86/pgtable.h
--- a/include/asm-x86/pgtable.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/pgtable.h
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@
return __pte(val);
}
-#define pte_pgprot(x) __pgprot(pte_val(x) & (0xfff | _PAGE_NX))
+#define pte_pgprot(x) __pgprot(pte_val(x) & ~PTE_MASK)
#define canon_pgprot(p) __pgprot(pgprot_val(p) & __supported_pte_mask)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-09 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-09 11:02 [PATCH 0 of 8] x86: use PTE_MASK consistently Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 1 of 8] x86: define PTE_MASK in a universally useful way Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 2 of 8] x86: fix warning on 32-bit non-PAE Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 3 of 8] x86: rearrange __(VIRTUAL|PHYSICAL)_MASK Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 4 of 8] x86: use PTE_MASK in 32-bit PAE Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 5 of 8] x86: use PTE_MASK in pgtable_32.h Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 15:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-05-09 18:36 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 6 of 8] x86: clarify use of _PAGE_CHG_MASK Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-09 11:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-05-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 8 of 8] xen: use PTE_MASK in pte_mfn() Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-13 10:11 ` [PATCH 0 of 8] x86: use PTE_MASK consistently Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-20 7:26 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-20 7:26 ` [PATCH 7 of 8] x86: use PTE_MASK rather than ad-hoc mask Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d7b47c83ea4a433bbbe2.1210330965@localhost \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox