From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
svens@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Julian Ruess <julianr@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] iommu/dma: Allow a single FQ in addition to per-CPU FQs
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 09:40:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8fdf1a5-3405-d449-bf94-7e2c19da8d15@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230215120327.947336-6-schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
On 2/15/23 7:03 AM, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> In some virtualized environments, including s390 paged memory guests,
> IOTLB flushes are used to update IOMMU shadow tables. Due to this, they
> are much more expensive than in typical bare metal environments or
> non-paged s390 guests. In addition they may parallelize more poorly in
> virtualized environments. This changes the trade off for flushing IOVAs
> such that minimizing the number of IOTLB flushes trumps any benefit of
> cheaper queuing operations or increased paralellism.
>
> In this scenario per-CPU flush queues pose several problems. Firstly
> per-CPU memory is often quite limited prohibiting larger queues.
> Secondly collecting IOVAs per-CPU but flushing via a global timeout
> reduces the number of IOVAs flushed for each timeout especially on s390
> where PCI interrupts may not be bound to a specific CPU.
>
> Let's introduce a single flush queue mode that reuses the same queue
> logic but only allocates a single global queue. This mode can be
> selected as a flag bit in a new dma_iommu_options struct which can be
> modified from its defaults by IOMMU drivers implementing a new
> ops.tune_dma_iommu() callback. As a first user the s390 IOMMU driver
> selects the single queue mode if IOTLB flushes are needed on map which
> indicates shadow table use. With the unchanged small FQ size and
> timeouts this setting is worse than per-CPU queues but a follow up patch
> will make the FQ size and timeout variable. Together this allows the
> common IOVA flushing code to more closely resemble the global flush
> behavior used on s390's previous internal DMA API implementation.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/3e402947-61f9-b7e8-1414-fde006257b6f@arm.com/
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> #s390
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-17 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-15 12:03 [PATCH v6 0/6] iommu/dma: s390 DMA API conversion and optimized IOTLB flushing Niklas Schnelle
2023-02-15 12:03 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] s390/ism: Set DMA coherent mask Niklas Schnelle
2023-02-15 12:03 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] iommu: Allow .iotlb_sync_map to fail and handle s390's -ENOMEM return Niklas Schnelle
2023-02-15 12:03 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] s390/pci: prepare is_passed_through() for dma-iommu Niklas Schnelle
2023-02-15 12:03 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] s390/pci: Use dma-iommu layer Niklas Schnelle
2023-02-15 18:00 ` Matthew Rosato
2023-02-17 8:51 ` Niklas Schnelle
2023-02-17 14:56 ` Matthew Rosato
2023-02-17 16:34 ` Niklas Schnelle
2023-02-15 12:03 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] iommu/dma: Allow a single FQ in addition to per-CPU FQs Niklas Schnelle
2023-02-17 14:40 ` Matthew Rosato [this message]
2023-02-15 12:03 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] iommu/dma: Make flush queue sizes and timeout driver configurable Niklas Schnelle
2023-02-17 14:41 ` Matthew Rosato
2023-02-17 15:40 ` Niklas Schnelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d8fdf1a5-3405-d449-bf94-7e2c19da8d15@linux.ibm.com \
--to=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=julianr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox