From: Hendrik Visage <hvjunk@gmail.com>
To: Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de>
Cc: suse-amd64@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: False "lost ticks" on dual-Opteron system (=> timer twice as fast)
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 21:42:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d93f04c705052112426ee35154@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200505081445.26663.bernd.paysan@gmx.de>
On 5/8/05, Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently set up a dual Opteron RAID server (AMD-8000-based Tyan
> Thunder K8S Pro SCSI board, 2 246 Opterons, stepping 10). Kernel is a
> modified 2.6.11.4-20a from SuSE 9.3 (SMP version, sure). The Opterons
> are capable of changing the CPU frequency (between 1GHz and 2GHz).
I'll be delving deeper into this thread soon, but I'm seeing similar
strangeness
on a Athlon64 (rated:3G+ real:2009MHz clock), 2.6.11-r8 (gentoo), MSI
K8N Neo Platinum.
ntp syncs time, then I start a couple of compiles, and I see ntp
losing track of time, big jitter etc. (and the one time source is in
on the local LAN syncing to the same remote servers). openntp I
noticed it also.
What I have noticed in my dmesg output is that I see "lost timer ticks
CPU Frequency change?" messages very early in the boot up.
> What I can't believe is that I'm the only one who has this problem.
I've seen this for about a week or three, and somehow I believe it
wasn't a problem before 2.6.11.
--
Hendrik Visage
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-21 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-08 12:45 False "lost ticks" on dual-Opteron system (=> timer twice as fast) Bernd Paysan
2005-05-08 13:40 ` [suse-amd64] " Andi Kleen
2005-05-08 16:22 ` Bernd Paysan
2005-05-09 10:53 ` Bernd Paysan
2005-05-09 13:17 ` Bernd Paysan
2005-05-10 10:53 ` Ed Tomlinson
2005-05-10 13:32 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-10 11:12 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-10 11:36 ` Bernd Paysan
2005-05-10 11:54 ` Bernd Paysan
2005-05-10 13:07 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-10 13:15 ` Bernd Paysan
2005-05-10 13:21 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-10 13:39 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-05-21 19:42 ` Hendrik Visage [this message]
2005-05-21 20:54 ` Scott Robert Ladd
[not found] ` <428F9FA6.1000800@coyotegulch.com>
[not found] ` <d93f04c70505211500216d8614@mail.gmail.com>
2005-05-23 11:50 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2005-05-23 23:04 ` Hendrik Visage
2005-05-25 17:06 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d93f04c705052112426ee35154@mail.gmail.com \
--to=hvjunk@gmail.com \
--cc=bernd.paysan@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suse-amd64@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox