From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.14-rc4-rt4
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 10:20:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d97c4305-d938-6b5f-073a-8d67a48fc9ae@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210804162001.resdas32c6oy75o3@linutronix.de>
On 8/4/21 10:20 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2021-08-04 10:05:39 [-0600], Jens Axboe wrote:
>> So what do you propose in the interim? As far as io_uring is concerned,
>> it's not a _huge_ deal to do the IRQ dance, but it does bother me that
>> we're making things slightly worse for the mainline kernel just to make
>> the out-of-tree patches happy.
>
> I'm sorry but I propose nothing other than the dance. I don't think
> PeterZ/ tglx will appreciate the ifdefery to avoid the IRQ-on/off here.
> I have no other ideas here.
Alright, I'll see if I can think of something. Don't like doing ifdefs
either, or enable checks - but at least it'd only hurt readability
slightly at that point.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-04 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-02 16:27 [ANNOUNCE] v5.14-rc4-rt4 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 8:24 ` Daniel Wagner
2021-08-04 10:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 10:48 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 11:00 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 13:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-04 13:32 ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-04 14:23 ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-04 15:33 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 15:39 ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-04 15:47 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 15:49 ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-04 15:57 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 16:05 ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-04 16:20 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 16:20 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2021-08-04 16:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-08-04 16:22 ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-04 16:47 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 16:57 ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-04 17:02 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-10 7:40 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-10 11:22 ` [PATCH] io-wq: remove GFP_ATOMIC allocation off schedule out path kernel test robot
2021-08-10 15:22 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-04 16:17 ` [ANNOUNCE] v5.14-rc4-rt4 Steven Rostedt
2021-08-04 16:22 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 16:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-08-04 16:31 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 16:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-08-04 16:57 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d97c4305-d938-6b5f-073a-8d67a48fc9ae@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wagi@monom.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox