From: "Manthey, Norbert" <nmanthey@amazon.de>
To: "keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
"Stieger, Andreas" <astieger@amazon.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>,
"Hemdan, Hagar Gamal Halim" <hagarhem@amazon.de>
Subject: Re: Extending Linux' Coverity model and also cover aarch64
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 06:19:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9dfab9a24297ce0bb9cbafb3968814d7ebe368d.camel@amazon.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202405161217.4984DE258@keescook>
On Thu, 2024-05-16 at 12:20 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
> not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender
> and know the content is safe.
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 03:28:16PM +0000, Manthey, Norbert wrote:
> > we published an extension for the Coverity model that is used by
> > the
> > CoverityScan setup for the Linux kernel [1]. We have been using
> > this
> > extension to analyze the 6.1 kernel branch, and reported some fixes
> > to
> > the upstream code base that are based on this model [2]. Feel free
> > to
> > merge the pull request, and update the model in the CoverityScan
> > setup.
> > We do not have access to that project to perform these updates
> > ourselves.
>
> Thanks for this! I'll get it loaded into the Linux-Next scanner.
Nice, thanks!
>
> > To increase the analysis coverage to aarch64, we analyzed a x86 and
> > a
> > aarch64 configuration. The increased coverage is achieved by using
> > re-
> > configuration and cross-compilation during the analysis build. If
> > you
> > are interested in this setup we can share the Dockerfile and script
> > we
> > used for this process.
>
> We've only got access to the free Coverity scanner, but it would be
> nice
> to see if there was anything specific to arm64.
Yes, I understand. Can you show how that free scanner is used? We
tweaked the command we fed into the "cov-build" tool. This tool should
be part of the scanner (if I remember that correctly).
>
> > To prevent regressions in backports to LTS kernels, we wondered
> > whether
> > the community is interested in setting up CoverityScan projects for
> > older kernel releases. Would such an extension be useful to show
> > new
> > defects in addition to the current release testing?
>
> The only one we (lightly) manage right now is the linux-next scanner.
> If
> other folks want to host scanners for -stable kernels, that would be
> interesting, yes.
Can you share explain or share pointers to how the current setup works?
If I understand that better, we can think about how to process the
other kernels.
Best,
Norbert
>
> -Kees
>
> --
> Kees Cook
Amazon Web Services Development Center Germany GmbH
Krausenstr. 38
10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Christian Schlaeger, Jonathan Weiss
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg unter HRB 257764 B
Sitz: Berlin
Ust-ID: DE 365 538 597
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-17 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-16 15:28 Extending Linux' Coverity model and also cover aarch64 Manthey, Norbert
2024-05-16 16:15 ` Greg KH
2024-05-16 19:20 ` Kees Cook
2024-05-17 6:19 ` Manthey, Norbert [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d9dfab9a24297ce0bb9cbafb3968814d7ebe368d.camel@amazon.de \
--to=nmanthey@amazon.de \
--cc=astieger@amazon.de \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=hagarhem@amazon.de \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox