Re: [PATCH 0/5] memory: tegra: Support EMC dfs on Tegra186/Tegra194

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 21/10/2025 21:19, Aaron Kling wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 2:11 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 21/10/2025 20:29, Aaron Kling via B4 Relay wrote:
>>> This series borrows the concept used on Tegra234 to scale EMC based on
>>> CPU frequency and applies it to Tegra186 and Tegra194. Except that the
>>> bpmp on those archs does not support bandwidth manager, so the scaling
>>> iteself is handled similar to how Tegra124 currently works.
>>>
>>> This was originally part of a larger series [0], but it was requested to
>>> be split into smaller series.
>>>
>>> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250909-tegra186-icc-v2-0-09413724e781@gmail.com
>>
>> Please keep correct versioning and changelog in the future. Try yourself:
>>
>> b4 diff '<20251021-tegra186-icc-p2-v1-0-39d53bdc9aab@gmail.com>'
>> Grabbing thread from
>> lore.kernel.org/all/20251021-tegra186-icc-p2-v1-0-39d53bdc9aab@gmail.com/t.mbox.gz
>> ---
>> Analyzing 6 messages in the thread
>> Could not find lower series to compare against.
>>
>> I think I emphasized last time how important is to make it readable and
>> easy for maintainers.
> 
> You said to split it, which I don't see how that means anything other
> than 'make new series'. How am I supposed to keep versioning when I

New series with old changelog! Why splitting means that entire old
discussions, old tags, old reviews, everything should be discarded?

> had to make three entirely new series?

I do not see where is the problem - it is trivial. If you use git, you
just keep numbering. If you use b4, you just force-revision n+1.

Best regards,
Krzysztof