* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review
2025-07-03 14:41 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-07-03 17:47 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-07-03 19:51 ` Hardik Garg
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2025-07-03 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow,
conor, hargar, broonie
On 7/3/25 07:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.96 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Jul 2025 14:39:10 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.96-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review
2025-07-03 14:41 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-07-03 17:47 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2025-07-03 19:51 ` Hardik Garg
2025-07-03 22:16 ` Shuah Khan
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Hardik Garg @ 2025-07-03 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, jonathanh, linux-kernel,
linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel, rwarsow, shuah, srw,
stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds
The kernel, bpf tool, and perf tool builds fine for v6.6.96-rc1 on x86 and arm64 Azure VM.
Kernel binary size for x86 build:
text data bss dec hex filename
27323349 16732218 4640768 48696335 2e70c0f vmlinux
Kernel binary size for arm64 build:
text data bss dec hex filename
34707028 13854434 970368 49531830 2f3cbb6 vmlinux
Tested-by: Hardik Garg <hargar@linux.microsoft.com>
Thanks,
Hardik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review
2025-07-03 14:41 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-07-03 17:47 ` Florian Fainelli
2025-07-03 19:51 ` Hardik Garg
@ 2025-07-03 22:16 ` Shuah Khan
2025-07-04 6:04 ` Ron Economos
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2025-07-03 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie, Shuah Khan
On 7/3/25 08:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.96 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Jul 2025 14:39:10 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.96-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review
2025-07-03 14:41 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-03 22:16 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2025-07-04 6:04 ` Ron Economos
2025-07-04 11:13 ` Jon Hunter
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2025-07-04 6:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On 7/3/25 07:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.96 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Jul 2025 14:39:10 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.96-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review
2025-07-03 14:41 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-04 6:04 ` Ron Economos
@ 2025-07-04 11:13 ` Jon Hunter
2025-07-04 12:14 ` Mark Brown
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-07-04 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Thu, 03 Jul 2025 16:41:03 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.96 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Jul 2025 14:39:10 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.96-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.6:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
120 tests: 120 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.6.96-rc1-ge950145d456d
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review
2025-07-03 14:41 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-04 11:13 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2025-07-04 12:14 ` Mark Brown
2025-07-04 13:25 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-07-04 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]
On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 04:41:03PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.96 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review
2025-07-03 14:41 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-04 12:14 ` Mark Brown
@ 2025-07-04 13:25 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-07-05 3:12 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-07-04 22:48 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-07-05 2:48 ` Peter Schneider
8 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-07-04 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
James Clark, Leo Yan, Yeoreum Yun, Suzuki K Poulose,
Anders Roxell, Dan Carpenter, Arnd Bergmann
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 at 20:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.96 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Jul 2025 14:39:10 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.96-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
The following build errors were noticed on arm with gcc-13 and clang-20 on
the stable-rc 6.6.96-rc1.
Test environments:
- arm
Regression Analysis:
- New regression? Yes
- Reproducibility? Yes
Test regression: 6.6.96-rc1: coresight-core.c error implicit
declaration of function 'FIELD_GET'
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Test log
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c: In function
'coresight_read_claim_tags':
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c:138:16: error: implicit
declaration of function 'FIELD_GET'
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
138 | return FIELD_GET(CORESIGHT_CLAIM_MASK,
| ^~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
## Build
* kernel: 6.6.96-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: e950145d456d01fa4e589d5e6183c2f8f0676743
* git describe: v6.6.95-140-ge950145d456d
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.95-140-ge950145d456d
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.6.94-289-g33e06c71265b)
* arm, build
- clang-20-lkftconfig
- clang-20-u8500_defconfig
- clang-nightly-lkftconfig
- clang-nightly-u8500_defconfig
- gcc-13-allmodconfig
- gcc-13-lkftconfig
- gcc-13-lkftconfig-debug
- gcc-13-lkftconfig-kasan
- gcc-13-lkftconfig-kunit
- gcc-13-lkftconfig-libgpiod
- gcc-13-lkftconfig-perf
- gcc-13-lkftconfig-rcutorture
- gcc-13-u8500_defconfig
- gcc-8-u8500_defconfig
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.6.94-289-g33e06c71265b)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.6.94-289-g33e06c71265b)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.6.94-289-g33e06c71265b)
## Test result summary
total: 224212, pass: 204338, fail: 5194, skip: 14300, xfail: 380
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 129 total, 113 passed, 15 failed, 1 skipped
* arm64: 44 total, 44 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 26 total, 25 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 32 total, 31 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 15 total, 14 passed, 0 failed, 1 skipped
* s390: 14 total, 13 passed, 1 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 7 total, 7 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 37 total, 36 passed, 0 failed, 1 skipped
## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mm
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* lava
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* modules
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review
2025-07-04 13:25 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-07-05 3:12 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-07-06 6:55 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-07-05 3:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
James Clark, Leo Yan, Yeoreum Yun, Suzuki K Poulose,
Anders Roxell, Dan Carpenter, Arnd Bergmann
On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 at 18:55, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 at 20:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.96 release.
> > There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Jul 2025 14:39:10 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.96-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> The following build errors were noticed on arm with gcc-13 and clang-20 on
> the stable-rc 6.6.96-rc1.
>
> Test environments:
> - arm
>
> Regression Analysis:
> - New regression? Yes
> - Reproducibility? Yes
>
> Test regression: 6.6.96-rc1: coresight-core.c error implicit
> declaration of function 'FIELD_GET'
>
Bisection results pointing to,
coresight: Only check bottom two claim bits
[ Upstream commit a4e65842e1142aa18ef36113fbd81d614eaefe5a ]
The following patch needs to be back ported ?
b36e78b216e6 ("ARM: 9354/1: ptrace: Use bitfield helpers")
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> ## Test log
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c: In function
> 'coresight_read_claim_tags':
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c:138:16: error: implicit
> declaration of function 'FIELD_GET'
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 138 | return FIELD_GET(CORESIGHT_CLAIM_MASK,
> | ^~~~~~~~~
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> ## Build
> * kernel: 6.6.96-rc1
> * git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> * git commit: e950145d456d01fa4e589d5e6183c2f8f0676743
> * git describe: v6.6.95-140-ge950145d456d
> * test details:
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.95-140-ge950145d456d
>
> ## Test Regressions (compared to v6.6.94-289-g33e06c71265b)
> * arm, build
> - clang-20-lkftconfig
> - clang-20-u8500_defconfig
> - clang-nightly-lkftconfig
> - clang-nightly-u8500_defconfig
> - gcc-13-allmodconfig
> - gcc-13-lkftconfig
> - gcc-13-lkftconfig-debug
> - gcc-13-lkftconfig-kasan
> - gcc-13-lkftconfig-kunit
> - gcc-13-lkftconfig-libgpiod
> - gcc-13-lkftconfig-perf
> - gcc-13-lkftconfig-rcutorture
> - gcc-13-u8500_defconfig
> - gcc-8-u8500_defconfig
- Naresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review
2025-07-05 3:12 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-07-06 6:55 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-07-07 9:03 ` Leo Yan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2025-07-06 6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
James Clark, Leo Yan, Yeoreum Yun, Suzuki K Poulose,
Anders Roxell, Dan Carpenter, Arnd Bergmann
On Sat, Jul 05, 2025 at 08:42:49AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 at 18:55, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 at 20:42, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.96 release.
> > > There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Jul 2025 14:39:10 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.96-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > The following build errors were noticed on arm with gcc-13 and clang-20 on
> > the stable-rc 6.6.96-rc1.
> >
> > Test environments:
> > - arm
> >
> > Regression Analysis:
> > - New regression? Yes
> > - Reproducibility? Yes
> >
> > Test regression: 6.6.96-rc1: coresight-core.c error implicit
> > declaration of function 'FIELD_GET'
> >
>
> Bisection results pointing to,
>
> coresight: Only check bottom two claim bits
> [ Upstream commit a4e65842e1142aa18ef36113fbd81d614eaefe5a ]
>
> The following patch needs to be back ported ?
> b36e78b216e6 ("ARM: 9354/1: ptrace: Use bitfield helpers")
Thanks, that makes sense, and is easier than me fixing this up by hand
like I had tried to in one of the branches :)
Now queued up.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review
2025-07-06 6:55 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-07-07 9:03 ` Leo Yan
2025-07-07 9:16 ` James Clark
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Leo Yan @ 2025-07-07 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Naresh Kamboju, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
James Clark, Yeoreum Yun, Suzuki K Poulose, Anders Roxell,
Dan Carpenter, Arnd Bergmann
On Sun, Jul 06, 2025 at 08:55:32AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
[...]
> > Bisection results pointing to,
> >
> > coresight: Only check bottom two claim bits
> > [ Upstream commit a4e65842e1142aa18ef36113fbd81d614eaefe5a ]
> >
> > The following patch needs to be back ported ?
> > b36e78b216e6 ("ARM: 9354/1: ptrace: Use bitfield helpers")
>
> Thanks, that makes sense, and is easier than me fixing this up by hand
> like I had tried to in one of the branches :)
>
> Now queued up.
I built for the Arm target in my local environment and confirmed that
the build failure has been fixed on the linux-6.6.y branch.
Thanks for reporting and resolving the issue.
Leo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review
2025-07-07 9:03 ` Leo Yan
@ 2025-07-07 9:16 ` James Clark
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: James Clark @ 2025-07-07 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leo Yan, Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Naresh Kamboju, stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm,
linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
Yeoreum Yun, Suzuki K Poulose, Anders Roxell, Dan Carpenter,
Arnd Bergmann
On 07/07/2025 10:03 am, Leo Yan wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 06, 2025 at 08:55:32AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Bisection results pointing to,
>>>
>>> coresight: Only check bottom two claim bits
>>> [ Upstream commit a4e65842e1142aa18ef36113fbd81d614eaefe5a ]
>>>
>>> The following patch needs to be back ported ?
>>> b36e78b216e6 ("ARM: 9354/1: ptrace: Use bitfield helpers")
>>
>> Thanks, that makes sense, and is easier than me fixing this up by hand
>> like I had tried to in one of the branches :)
>>
>> Now queued up.
>
> I built for the Arm target in my local environment and confirmed that
> the build failure has been fixed on the linux-6.6.y branch.
>
> Thanks for reporting and resolving the issue.
>
> Leo
That commit only fixes it by transitively including the header though.
I'll send a proper fix to include it in coresight-core.c so it doesn't
break again in the future.
Thanks
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review
2025-07-03 14:41 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-04 13:25 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-07-04 22:48 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-07-05 2:48 ` Peter Schneider
8 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Ojeda @ 2025-07-04 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, jonathanh, linux-kernel,
linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel, rwarsow, shuah, srw,
stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds, Miguel Ojeda
On Thu, 03 Jul 2025 16:41:03 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.96 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Jul 2025 14:39:10 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Boot-tested under QEMU for Rust x86_64:
Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review
2025-07-03 14:41 [PATCH 6.6 000/139] 6.6.96-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2025-07-04 22:48 ` Miguel Ojeda
@ 2025-07-05 2:48 ` Peter Schneider
8 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider @ 2025-07-05 2:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
Am 03.07.2025 um 16:41 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.96 release.
> There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Builds, boots and works on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg
oddities or regressions found.
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider
--
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you. -- David McCullough Jr.
OpenPGP: 0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread