From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D062E14A8E for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 20:18:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764965903; cv=none; b=XK05uzax3yU41WrcJqgah1CHhCA4iZJ+9ams3+/ZZfyejTSPBZ5G6P9Tuuy9Eq5p3I22uyCRNE6gNXNKPkAla+V96zIreoHRJXKIl9hqbRQIo8BxcERG2mQkJLx6uMfBlzSlv4TZHNmDUAlqLELwIMeAbKT/wH7J2hZ5fSpGkB0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764965903; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HQuk+LoAt1ilJ9+l61gCZEqNMa+zVqm+64YEoeQNKEs=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=U8G02gnl1sFNlqucLELLynAxMCocl1PvK0ZB1n0nCLf0ugVJx8LWB2F90rzTMR5KG1nIkGeroE1o9kSaNCkHfcv8frple3L4Fb+j5HA/QKzsMIWUFj5ElEQ/cGG4FfcGoSTfMIcF+nEKc7bIRF4x+yZ9/bEQ66wIbvKkUZrWk/0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=GzuH+956; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="GzuH+956" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2623C4CEF1; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 20:18:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1764965903; bh=HQuk+LoAt1ilJ9+l61gCZEqNMa+zVqm+64YEoeQNKEs=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=GzuH+9567mOPIpXag3z4woawi3CLBh4zMhzSRFmboSOtbW7UriLFohM5GrBEMfzOF Pr7GUS4SVmWspQ6MMaXW5tV4l8Twf+SG7qIs73eT9lhKZLu8Evh5Gm+UCp73zHLvMo IuACR/G6fW+Elvl3OuTY6/wlYIBx3xFTEbk0LKMPHULzroa4DmVuppLhVhFB2gb+KQ 0yv0eWOiHFA4wyn3xOX17J3lMR/1jl7Ii37Zm14qDtcglmJOHdAw38h7NDuC2iDVEv x+EKiklJUNGuEmYfQaF6KOylBc+xRrkEhpUxB5X86PwQRIU3XEjnvf2ZHdIZsp2N5l GAQGxE/VtL64Q== Message-ID: Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 21:18:18 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: avoid use of BIT() macro for initialising VMA flags To: Andrew Morton , Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: "Liam R . Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Mike Rapoport , Suren Baghdasaryan , Michal Hocko , oliver.sang@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20251205175037.1287366-1-lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> <20251205121501.bf47efd78d0a1a8f0370645c@linux-foundation.org> From: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20251205121501.bf47efd78d0a1a8f0370645c@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/5/25 21:15, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 17:50:37 +0000 Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > >> Commit 2b6a3f061f11 ("mm: declare VMA flags by bit") significantly changed >> >> ... >> >> Andrew - note I've referenced the linux-next commit number above, could you >> replace with the upstream commit hash once your PR is taken? Thanks! > > That's in mm-stable so the hash shouldn't be changing. > > > I'm not really sure what's the best way to determine this. I use > > hp2:/usr/src/mm> git tag --contains 2b6a3f061f11 > mm-everything-2025-11-29-19-43 > mm-everything-2025-12-01-19-02 > mm-everything-2025-12-03-23-49 > mm-everything-2025-12-05-00-55 > mm-stable-2025-12-03-21-26 I asked myself the same question a couple of times. Maybe this? $ git branch -r --contains 2b6a3f061f11 mm/mm-everything mm/mm-new mm/mm-stable -- Cheers David