From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>
To: "Mehta, Sohil" <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"Nikula, Jani" <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com"
<kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
"rppt@kernel.org" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"bigeasy@linutronix.de" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"jpoimboe@kernel.org" <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
"pmladek@suse.com" <pmladek@suse.com>,
"xin@zytor.com" <xin@zytor.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] x86/nmi: Consolidate NMI panic variables
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 01:06:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dcd22645ee5e5fcbbdb03ead0c6c68e4c09923df.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d6f148e4-085d-4bd6-b0a8-394149d8aeef@intel.com>
On Mon, 2025-03-31 at 16:20 -0700, Mehta, Sohil wrote:
> On 3/31/2025 4:05 PM, Huang, Kai wrote:
> > On Mon, 2025-03-31 at 15:50 -0700, Mehta, Sohil wrote:
> > > On 3/31/2025 3:43 PM, Huang, Kai wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2025-03-27 at 23:46 +0000, Mehta, Sohil wrote:
> > > > > Commit feeaf5512947 ("x86: Move sysctls into arch/x86")
> > > >
> > > > AFAICT the commit hash is wrong. It should be c305a4e98378.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, sorry about that. I ended up referencing a pre-merge duplicate
> > > commit in my repo.
> > >
> > > Thankfully, Ingo fixed it when he applied the patch:
> > > https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?h=x86/nmi&id=1a5b15f6b4d18507dc3b2958ca01877cfc8808fd
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Ah I didn't know this series was merged. I think I'll stop looking at it. :-)
>
> Your review comments have been useful. Please continue reviewing if you
> can. You found an issue in patch 1 that both of us missed.
>
I just did. I didn't find anything apart from one thing that I _think_ it might
be helpful to mention another commit in the changelog of patch 5 "x86/nmi: Fix
comment in unknown NMI handling".
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-01 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-27 23:46 [PATCH 0/9] x86: Cleanup NMI handling Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/nmi: Simplify unknown NMI panic handling Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 22:52 ` Huang, Kai
2025-03-31 23:01 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 15:00 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-04-01 15:54 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/nmi: Consolidate NMI panic variables Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 22:43 ` Huang, Kai
2025-03-31 22:50 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 23:05 ` Huang, Kai
2025-03-31 23:20 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 1:06 ` Huang, Kai [this message]
2025-04-01 5:46 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 8:08 ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/nmi: Use a macro to initialize NMI descriptors Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 23:46 ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/nmi: Remove export of local_touch_nmi() Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 23:47 ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/nmi: Fix comment in unknown NMI handling Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 0:17 ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-01 5:28 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 5:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-01 5:53 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [tip: x86/nmi] x86/nmi: Fix comment in unknown_nmi_error() tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/nmi: Improve and relocate NMI handler comments Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 1:03 ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/nmi: Improve NMI header documentation Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 10:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-31 16:04 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 21:36 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 8:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-01 16:11 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [tip: x86/nmi] x86/nmi: Add missing description x86_platform_ops::get_nmi_reason to <asm/x86_init.h> tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [tip: x86/nmi] x86/nmi: Improve <asm/nmi.h> documentation tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/nmi: Clean up NMI selftest Sohil Mehta
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/nmi: Improve NMI duration console print Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 0:42 ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [tip: x86/nmi] x86/nmi: Improve NMI duration console printouts tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 14:54 ` [PATCH 0/9] x86: Cleanup NMI handling Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-01 16:00 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-04-02 15:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dcd22645ee5e5fcbbdb03ead0c6c68e4c09923df.camel@intel.com \
--to=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox