From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Maarten Brock <Maarten.Brock@sttls.nl>,
"linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-api@vger.kernel.org" <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Serial port DTR/RTS - O_NRESETDEV
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 11:55:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dcf3c388-0927-4859-92c6-e52a281224cf@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025111227-equipment-magnetism-1443@gregkh>
On 2025-11-12 11:39, Greg KH wrote:
> Trimming out stuff to get to the real questions:
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 11:12:22AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Things that I have identified, at least in my opinion:
>>
>> 1. Opening a device for configuration as opposed to data streaming; in the tty case that doesn't just improve the DTR# and RTS# issue but allows setserial, configuring line disciplines and so on.
>>
>> As I have said, this is application-specific intent, which is why I strongly believe that it needs to be part of the open system call. I furthermore believe that it would have use cases beyond ttys and serial ports, which is why I'm proposing a new open flag as opposed to a sysfs attribute, which actually was my initial approach (yes, I have already prototyped some of this, and as referenced before there is an existing patchset that was never merged.)
>
> I think this is going to be the most difficult. I don't remember why I
> rejected the old submission, but maybe it would have modified the
> existing behaviour? A new open flag "O_DO_NOT_TOUCH_ANYTHING" might be
> the simplest?
That was exactly my proposal - see the header of this thread :)
>> 3. The only way to determine the type of a tty driver is reading and parsing /proc/tty/drivers; that information is exported neither through ioctl nor sysfs. Exporting *that* through sysfs is probably the easiest of all the improvements.
>
> The "type" is interesting. We keep adding new "types" of serial ports
> to the uapi list, and they don't really show up very well to userspace,
> as you say. Adding this export to sysfs is fine with me, but we should
> make it a string somehow, and not just a random number like the current
> types are listed as, to give people a chance to keep track of this.
>
> So yes, this too should be done.
I meant to add this to the previous email -- the obvious choice (and what is
in my prototype) is to use the same string as is currently exposed in
/proc/tty/drivers.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-07 7:53 RFC: Serial port DTR/RTS - O_NRESETDEV H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-07 17:37 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-09 2:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-10 3:35 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-10 5:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-10 10:06 ` Maarten Brock
2025-11-10 20:19 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-10 21:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-11 3:51 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-11 3:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-11 4:38 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-11 10:21 ` Maarten Brock
2025-11-11 21:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-12 11:22 ` Greg KH
2025-11-12 16:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-12 16:46 ` Greg KH
2025-11-12 19:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-12 19:39 ` Greg KH
2025-11-12 19:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-12 19:55 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2025-11-13 22:24 ` RFC: Serial port DTR/RTS - O_<something> H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-14 10:26 ` Maarten Brock
2025-11-14 18:49 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-11-14 18:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-15 21:29 ` Ned Ulbricht
2025-11-15 22:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-16 0:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-18 16:33 ` Ned Ulbricht
2025-11-18 17:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-18 18:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-20 13:31 ` Ned Ulbricht
2025-11-10 5:20 ` RFC: Serial port DTR/RTS - O_NRESETDEV H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-09 20:43 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dcf3c388-0927-4859-92c6-e52a281224cf@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=Maarten.Brock@sttls.nl \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox