The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Maarten Brock <Maarten.Brock@sttls.nl>,
	"linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-api@vger.kernel.org" <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Serial port DTR/RTS - O_NRESETDEV
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 11:55:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dcf3c388-0927-4859-92c6-e52a281224cf@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025111227-equipment-magnetism-1443@gregkh>

On 2025-11-12 11:39, Greg KH wrote:
> Trimming out stuff to get to the real questions:
> 
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 11:12:22AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Things that I have identified, at least in my opinion:
>>
>> 1. Opening a device for configuration as opposed to data streaming; in the tty case that doesn't just improve the DTR# and RTS# issue but allows setserial, configuring line disciplines and so on.
>>
>> As I have said, this is application-specific intent, which is why I strongly believe that it needs to be part of the open system call. I furthermore believe that it would have use cases beyond ttys and serial ports, which is why I'm proposing a new open flag as opposed to a sysfs attribute, which actually was my initial approach (yes, I have already prototyped some of this, and as referenced before there is an existing patchset that was never merged.)
> 
> I think this is going to be the most difficult.  I don't remember why I
> rejected the old submission, but maybe it would have modified the
> existing behaviour?  A new open flag "O_DO_NOT_TOUCH_ANYTHING" might be
> the simplest?

That was exactly my proposal - see the header of this thread :)

>> 3. The only way to determine the type of a tty driver is reading and parsing /proc/tty/drivers; that information is exported neither through ioctl nor sysfs. Exporting *that* through sysfs is probably the easiest of all the improvements.
> 
> The "type" is interesting.  We keep adding new "types" of serial ports
> to the uapi list, and they don't really show up very well to userspace,
> as you say.  Adding this export to sysfs is fine with me, but we should
> make it a string somehow, and not just a random number like the current
> types are listed as, to give people a chance to keep track of this.
> 
> So yes, this too should be done.

I meant to add this to the previous email -- the obvious choice (and what is
in my prototype) is to use the same string as is currently exposed in
/proc/tty/drivers.

	-hpa


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-12 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-07  7:53 RFC: Serial port DTR/RTS - O_NRESETDEV H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-07 17:37 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-09  2:25   ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-10  3:35     ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-10  5:00       ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-10 10:06         ` Maarten Brock
2025-11-10 20:19           ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-10 21:05             ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-11  3:51               ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-11  3:57                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-11  4:38                   ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-11 10:21                     ` Maarten Brock
2025-11-11 21:28                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-12 11:22                   ` Greg KH
2025-11-12 16:09                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-12 16:46                       ` Greg KH
2025-11-12 19:12                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-12 19:39                           ` Greg KH
2025-11-12 19:53                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-12 19:55                             ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2025-11-13 22:24                             ` RFC: Serial port DTR/RTS - O_<something> H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-14 10:26                               ` Maarten Brock
2025-11-14 18:49                               ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-11-14 18:53                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-15 21:29                                   ` Ned Ulbricht
2025-11-15 22:29                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-16  0:47                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-18 16:33                                       ` Ned Ulbricht
2025-11-18 17:31                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-18 18:05                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-20 13:31                                           ` Ned Ulbricht
2025-11-10  5:20   ` RFC: Serial port DTR/RTS - O_NRESETDEV H. Peter Anvin
2025-11-09 20:43 ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dcf3c388-0927-4859-92c6-e52a281224cf@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=Maarten.Brock@sttls.nl \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox