Re: 答复: 答复: 答复: [外部邮件] Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Fix timer interval adjustment after logging a MCE event

[Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>]

On 13.01.26 г. 21:44 ч., Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 09:37:13PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>> Yes, and why is Li's approach not working, i.e if mc_poll_banks() returns a
>> value signalling "i found an MCE" we halve, otherwise we double it?
> 
> It might be "working" but I don't like that "bool logged" thing and
> marshalling it back'n'forth. This should be waaay simpler.
> 
>> That's certainly doable, but why should the interval setting be coupled to
>> the initial notifier and not to mc_poll_banks?
> 
> What's the difference who notifies the timer? The banks polling will call the
> notifier if it finds an error to log.
> 
> But before we do any of that, we need to figure out what commit broke this so
> that we fix stable.
> 
> Thx.
> 


grepping around points to your 011d82611172 ("RAS: Add a Corrected 
Errors Collector"). Because looking at the commit log of my 6447828875b7 
("x86/mce/inject: Remove call to mce_notify_irq()") I mention that 
mce_need_notify got introduced in your commit and it was called 
"notify_user" before that. Before your commit in mce_log there was an 
explicit set_bit(mce_need_notify) call .