From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-202.mailbox.org (mout-p-202.mailbox.org [80.241.56.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35F161C283; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 17:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="L5ziap7k" Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [10.196.197.102]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-202.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4T4xJD4kg8z9skm; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:18:20 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1704302300; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=H9Inf9KTIOOuafLHFpFPsLLmeqzoKAhBG4TxdZv4V1Q=; b=L5ziap7k4Dj1fDzmrDiEP3MQtfRJkXSqW1zOihLhFoM66qmPX2GRVM2E+dCJxeryvWYusI hap79P6ZYnJ/hCmd6ntFwOvpG5DHwxysEdfb7tbZdg2zKb12YhaQ9KpdQyPfN/E0qzGN73 WMkHOEx0p1Ko0Iyg69wKhejZSoskh/1B+qcdgNBmaH1E4B57hriS+SWOSUqXH/dxLHAPXz 1UYnMS/9YVQIr72bPE6mE9uMs/4UdLdV8SQbRTDz/pE3bdN4BtETzBw8I/0RNCOHM1iwXU bwfeDcVZGRexCLi0axE968wmxkcusuVdqPhR+jt+wQLcvgVmoOhEqRCyVSDjlA== Message-ID: Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:18:13 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm: property: One function call less in drm_property_create() after error detection Content-Language: en-CA To: Markus Elfring , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann Cc: LKML , cocci@inria.fr References: <9b1e7330-f4f6-47f8-a568-eaea1624bb6f@web.de> <37647c33-7f9d-4763-8bf4-cfc5c9a811de@mailbox.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Michel_D=C3=A4nzer?= In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MBO-RS-ID: 51b942f4997b0e75b14 X-MBO-RS-META: 7gkhgojj8hqinqnum7czaaskymgcguyf On 2024-01-03 17:24, Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Out of curiosity, what exactly did Coccinelle report? > > Some SmPL scripts from my own selection tend to point questionable implementation details out. That doesn't answer my question. Without seeing the actual Coccinelle report, I'll assume that it didn't actually call for this change. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | https://redhat.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and Xwayland developer