public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, luto@kernel.org,
	shuah@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org, wad@chromium.org,
	deller@gmx.de, macro@orcam.me.uk, charlie@rivosinc.com,
	kevin.brodsky@arm.com, ldv@strace.io, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	song@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com, ada.coupriediaz@arm.com,
	broonie@kernel.org, pengcan@kylinos.cn, dvyukov@google.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/16] arm64/ptrace: Refactor syscall_trace_enter/exit()
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 11:18:14 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd3a1421-dfb0-445e-b2f7-7c273fa4a020@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251204082123.2792067-5-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>

On 04/12/25 1:51 PM, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> The generic syscall entry code has the following form, which use
> the input syscall work flag and syscall number:
> 
> | syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, long syscall,
> |		      unsigned long work)
> |
> | syscall_exit_work(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long work)
> 
> In preparation for moving arm64 over to the generic entry code,
> refactor syscall_trace_enter/exit() to also pass thread flags, and
> get syscall number by syscall_get_nr() helper.
> 
> No functional changes.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h |  4 ++--
>  arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c       | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
>  arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c      |  5 +++--
>  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
> index 5e4c7fc44f73..cef1d9ce6e1b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static inline int syscall_get_arch(struct task_struct *task)
>  	return AUDIT_ARCH_AARCH64;
>  }
>  
> -int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs);
> -void syscall_trace_exit(struct pt_regs *regs);
> +int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, long syscall, unsigned long flags);
> +void syscall_trace_exit(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long flags);
>  
>  #endif	/* __ASM_SYSCALL_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
> index 3926ce6aa268..b962cbcca11d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -2381,9 +2381,8 @@ static void report_syscall_exit(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, long syscall, unsigned long flags)
>  {
> -	unsigned long flags = read_thread_flags();
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (flags & (_TIF_SYSCALL_EMU | _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)) {
> @@ -2396,19 +2395,27 @@ int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	if (secure_computing() == -1)
>  		return NO_SYSCALL;
>  
> -	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT))
> -		trace_sys_enter(regs, regs->syscallno);
> +	/* Either of the above might have changed the syscall number */
> +	syscall = syscall_get_nr(current, regs);
>  
> -	audit_syscall_entry(regs->syscallno, regs->orig_x0, regs->regs[1],
> +	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)) {
> +		trace_sys_enter(regs, syscall);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Probes or BPF hooks in the tracepoint may have changed the
> +		 * system call number as well.
> +		 */
> +		 syscall = syscall_get_nr(current, regs);
> +	}
> +
> +	audit_syscall_entry(syscall, regs->orig_x0, regs->regs[1],
>  			    regs->regs[2], regs->regs[3]);
>  
> -	return regs->syscallno;
> +	return syscall;

regs->syscallno still remains unchanged even if syscall is evaluated to be different ?

>  }
>  
> -void syscall_trace_exit(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +void syscall_trace_exit(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long flags)
>  {
> -	unsigned long flags = read_thread_flags();
> -
>  	audit_syscall_exit(regs);
>  
>  	if (flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c
> index aba7ca6bca2d..ec31f82d2e9f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c
> @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static void el0_svc_common(struct pt_regs *regs, int scno, int sc_nr,
>  		 */
>  		if (scno == NO_SYSCALL)
>  			syscall_set_return_value(current, regs, -ENOSYS, 0);
> -		scno = syscall_trace_enter(regs);
> +		scno = syscall_trace_enter(regs, scno, flags);
>  		if (scno == NO_SYSCALL)
>  			goto trace_exit;
>  	}
> @@ -143,7 +143,8 @@ static void el0_svc_common(struct pt_regs *regs, int scno, int sc_nr,
>  	}
>  
>  trace_exit:
> -	syscall_trace_exit(regs);
> +	flags = read_thread_flags();
> +	syscall_trace_exit(regs, flags);
>  }
>  
>  void do_el0_svc(struct pt_regs *regs)


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-08  5:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-04  8:21 [PATCH v9 00/16] arm64: entry: Convert to Generic Entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04  8:21 ` [PATCH v9 01/16] arm64: Remove unused _TIF_WORK_MASK Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-08  4:42   ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-04  8:21 ` [PATCH v9 02/16] arm64/ptrace: Split report_syscall() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-08  5:02   ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-04  8:21 ` [PATCH v9 03/16] arm64/ptrace: Return early for ptrace_report_syscall_entry() error Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-08  5:24   ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-08  6:31     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-09 13:46   ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-12  4:00     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-15 15:24       ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-04  8:21 ` [PATCH v9 04/16] arm64/ptrace: Refactor syscall_trace_enter/exit() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-08  5:48   ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2025-12-08  6:24     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04  8:21 ` [PATCH v9 05/16] arm64: ptrace: Move rseq_syscall() before audit_syscall_exit() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04  8:21 ` [PATCH v9 06/16] arm64: syscall: Rework el0_svc_common() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04  8:21 ` [PATCH v9 07/16] arm64/ptrace: Not check _TIF_SECCOMP/SYSCALL_EMU for syscall_exit_work() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04  8:21 ` [PATCH v9 08/16] arm64/ptrace: Do not report_syscall_exit() for PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04  8:21 ` [PATCH v9 09/16] arm64/ptrace: Expand secure_computing() in place Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04  8:21 ` [PATCH v9 10/16] arm64/ptrace: Use syscall_get_arguments() helper Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04  8:21 ` [PATCH v9 11/16] entry: Split syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work() for arch reuse Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04  8:21 ` [PATCH v9 12/16] entry: Add arch_ptrace_report_syscall_entry/exit() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04  8:21 ` [PATCH v9 13/16] arm64: entry: Convert to generic entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-09 13:47   ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-04  8:21 ` [PATCH v9 14/16] arm64: Inline el0_svc_common() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-09 13:48   ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-10  2:56     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04  8:21 ` [PATCH v9 15/16] entry: Inline syscall_exit_work() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-09 13:48   ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-11  6:55     ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-12-11  9:52       ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-12  1:12         ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-12-12  1:26       ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-12  3:49     ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04  8:21 ` [PATCH v9 16/16] selftests: sud_test: Support aarch64 Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-20 14:53   ` kemal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dd3a1421-dfb0-445e-b2f7-7c273fa4a020@arm.com \
    --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=ldv@strace.io \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=pengcan@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox