From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Cc: "Barnabás Pőcze" <pobrn@protonmail.com>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Mark Gross" <markgross@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] platform/x86: wmi: Break possible infinite loop when parsing GUID
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 13:02:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <decdc3d2-8e30-3ca9-d64c-4c76b8f160ca@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZJRh9o1a0k0yMbOG@smile.fi.intel.com>
Hi Andy,
On 6/22/23 17:00, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:43:20AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:50:51PM +0200, Armin Wolf wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> I think that WARN_ON() is a bit bogus. First of all, it can be easily
>> transformed to BUG()-equivalent with panic_on_oops and hence kill the
>> entire system. If we need the message about wrong GUID format, it should
>> be done elsewhere (modpost ?). I.o.w. we shan't expect that code,
>> controlled by us, shoots to our foot.
>
> Additional info. There will be another driver elsewhere that may use similar
> API and also needs GUID in device ID table.
>
> Looking into that implementation it seems that validation should be made in
> file2alias.c for WMI and reused by that driver.
>
> So, taking into account that we have no wrong IDs so far, I would drop
> WARN_ON() here and guarantee that file2alias.c will be changed to validate
> the GUID one way or the other.
>
> Would it work? Hans, what is your comment here?
I agree that warning on malformed GUIDs does not belong here and
your patch already drops the WARN_ON while switching to the new
guid_parse_and_compare() helper.
So I'll go and merge this into my fixes branch once rc1 is out.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-04 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-21 15:11 [PATCH v1 1/2] platform/x86: wmi: Break possible infinite loop when parsing GUID Andy Shevchenko
2023-06-21 15:11 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] platform/x86: wmi: Replace open coded guid_parse_and_compare() Andy Shevchenko
2023-06-21 21:21 ` Armin Wolf
2023-06-21 21:20 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] platform/x86: wmi: Break possible infinite loop when parsing GUID Armin Wolf
2023-06-21 21:29 ` Barnabás Pőcze
2023-06-21 21:50 ` Armin Wolf
2023-06-22 8:43 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-06-22 15:00 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-07-04 11:02 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2023-07-06 10:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-06-22 8:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-07-11 9:36 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=decdc3d2-8e30-3ca9-d64c-4c76b8f160ca@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=W_Armin@gmx.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markgross@kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pobrn@protonmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox