From: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@huawei.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: <netfs@lists.linux.dev>, <jlayton@kernel.org>,
<hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>, <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>,
<zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>, <linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<libaokun1@huawei.com>, <yangerkun@huawei.com>,
<houtao1@huawei.com>, <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] cachefiles: Modify inappropriate error return value in cachefiles_daemon_secctx()
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 19:47:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <df196eaa-e017-4f2e-a443-0431873a5d71@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <304108.1728559896@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
在 2024/10/10 19:31, David Howells 写道:
> Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> In cachefiles_daemon_secctx(), if it is detected that secctx has been
>> written to the cache, the error code returned is -EINVAL, which is
>> inappropriate and does not distinguish the situation well.
>
> I disagree: it is an invalid parameter, not an already extant file, and a
> message is logged for clarification. I'd prefer to avoid filesystem errors as
> we are also doing filesystem operations.
>
> David
>
>
Alright, what I originally intended was to differentiate the error codes
between cases where no arguments are specified and where cache->secctx
already exists.
Thanks,
Zizhi Wo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-10 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-21 2:42 [PATCH 0/8] netfs/cachefiles: Some bugfixes Zizhi Wo
2024-08-21 2:42 ` [PATCH 1/8] cachefiles: Fix incorrect block calculations in __cachefiles_prepare_write() Zizhi Wo
2024-10-10 10:34 ` David Howells
2024-10-10 11:11 ` Zizhi Wo
2024-10-10 11:36 ` David Howells
2024-10-10 12:17 ` Zizhi Wo
2024-10-10 13:15 ` Zizhi Wo
2024-08-21 2:42 ` [PATCH 2/8] cachefiles: Fix incorrect length return value in cachefiles_ondemand_fd_write_iter() Zizhi Wo
2024-08-21 2:42 ` [PATCH 3/8] cachefiles: Fix missing pos updates " Zizhi Wo
2024-10-10 11:26 ` David Howells
2024-08-21 2:42 ` [PATCH 4/8] cachefiles: Clear invalid cache data in advance Zizhi Wo
2024-10-10 11:16 ` David Howells
2024-08-21 2:42 ` [PATCH 5/8] cachefiles: Clean up in cachefiles_commit_tmpfile() Zizhi Wo
2024-10-10 11:23 ` David Howells
2024-08-21 2:42 ` [PATCH 6/8] cachefiles: Modify inappropriate error return value in cachefiles_daemon_secctx() Zizhi Wo
2024-10-10 11:31 ` David Howells
2024-10-10 11:47 ` Zizhi Wo [this message]
2024-08-21 2:43 ` [PATCH 7/8] cachefiles: Fix NULL pointer dereference in object->file Zizhi Wo
2024-10-10 11:26 ` David Howells
2024-10-10 12:04 ` Zizhi Wo
2024-10-10 14:52 ` David Howells
2024-10-11 1:31 ` Zizhi Wo
2024-08-21 2:43 ` [PATCH 8/8] netfs/fscache: Add a memory barrier for FSCACHE_VOLUME_CREATING Zizhi Wo
2024-10-10 11:24 ` David Howells
2024-10-10 3:08 ` [PATCH 0/8] netfs/cachefiles: Some bugfixes Zizhi Wo
2024-10-10 3:31 ` Gao Xiang
2024-10-10 4:08 ` Zizhi Wo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=df196eaa-e017-4f2e-a443-0431873a5d71@huawei.com \
--to=wozizhi@huawei.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
--cc=zhujia.zj@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox