From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 008.lax.mailroute.net (008.lax.mailroute.net [199.89.1.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD6A92E648; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:32:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712860379; cv=none; b=Ys3htqDW5hn7/Ps2VLe1dHqWq/XgB/yb56o1ixn6sfnOtutTuCnFsTk8lPmcPNisNsmG9WW7EWp4pm/AII7fLgHSndfiEKFCrhrTxFD4uEgukslTa7rxAckCh993GNRro+RZfBISIrLCpMBUlJM9chqMsQYeHGGpqLbWmPeRzyQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712860379; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PD4Rq4W481XE02wN1L8egVrSphLnZDE/5wUQV1tuxoA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=gphOh7uOLlE7QmNh8W3qLTmLn4Q1kdHFMl541pObQq6neYBe3U4Tf9zR3BDUTJfDSZDqJ+Da5AiwXZNTAuG9H7P7kz+/+ZDfTKqaSCFfuBIc27SaPuMMmugnCDxDyiT8QgkrM/1V9ylmdIEpZy183kHQNGkHtgqje8QINq+EJtQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=29zMudxn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="29zMudxn" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 008.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VFpGd0Y7Rz6Cnk8t; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:32:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1712860374; x=1715452375; bh=joEZF4PZ/4PCQq6e7Lo+KVIu C23IHujteHggRqCxv0s=; b=29zMudxn/gxyq7ijpfFZeUBn8zAKy4MAF6VTdxoI YVEJdtR4DsiWGaCtphgyjWIHGEfs4b7nCT4+kZsoJf0m5Q4GIlm2mOFxwu1RDW/5 aaGvOCLJ7GolNI3H90J13zkjPvVcNeVGZVOLqR79g9/qV4KncGwykWM0wsVyqRU3 8ZnZKeSC/FBti+3BtsFhD9LxdYsqq2TedtFdXTUTH+BiPlOcO0970+6+1VGFI5zF G8Jz0nZ7eMwVKRTTgMjBQfZlL4Nad6sVRVqtcoFa1KXqLxD4A3kQR/UgLPFwoOx5 zp0z39M97qUwQSDZGcoySiRiLTuDyRbuOrcS9r45/LVNUw== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 008.lax.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (008.lax [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id q49H48TrprJT; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:32:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.96.154.26] (unknown [104.132.0.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 008.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4VFpGZ08t6z6Cnk8m; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:32:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:32:51 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] scsi: ufs: Remove support for old UFSHCI versions To: Avri Altman , "James E . J . Bottomley" , "Martin K . Petersen" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Bean Huo , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20240410183720.908-1-avri.altman@wdc.com> <20240410183720.908-2-avri.altman@wdc.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <20240410183720.908-2-avri.altman@wdc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 4/10/24 11:37, Avri Altman wrote: > UFS spec version 2.1 was published more than 10 years ago. It is > vanishingly unlikely that even there are out there platforms that uses > earlier host controllers, let alone that those ancient platforms will > ever run a V6.10 kernel. To be extra cautious, leave out removal of > UFSHCI 2.0 support from this patch, and just remove support of host > controllers prior to UFS2.0. Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche