From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@amd.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
corbet@lwn.net, tony.luck@intel.com, james.morse@arm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Cc: Dave.Martin@arm.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, paulmck@kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com, david@redhat.com,
arnd@arndb.de, fvdl@google.com, seanjc@google.com,
jpoimboe@kernel.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com,
xin@zytor.com, manali.shukla@amd.com, tao1.su@linux.intel.com,
sohil.mehta@intel.com, kai.huang@intel.com, xiaoyao.li@intel.com,
peterz@infradead.org, xin3.li@intel.com,
kan.liang@linux.intel.com, mario.limonciello@amd.com,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, perry.yuan@amd.com,
gautham.shenoy@amd.com, chang.seok.bae@intel.com,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
peternewman@google.com, eranian@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 23/34] fs/resctrl: Support counter read/reset with mbm_event assignment mode
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 12:53:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <df7cee69-7873-4b6c-9401-74a7d74d672c@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a4410c5-c72f-4a8b-ab64-9737e082c5b1@intel.com>
Hi Reinette,
On 7/17/25 22:53, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 7/8/25 3:17 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>> When "mbm_event" counter assignment mode is enabled, the architecture
>> requires a counter ID to read the event data.
>>
>> Introduce an is_cntr field in struct rmid_read to indicate whether counter
>> assignment mode is in use.
>>
>> Update the logic to call resctrl_arch_cntr_read() and
>> resctrl_arch_reset_cntr() when the assignment mode is active.
>>
>> Declare mbm_cntr_get() in fs/resctrl/internal.h to make it accessible to
>> other functions within fs/resctrl.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
>> ---
>> v15: New patch to add is_cntr in rmid_read as discussed in
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/b4b14670-9cb0-4f65-abd5-39db996e8da9@intel.com/
>> ---
>> fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c | 8 ++++++++
>> fs/resctrl/internal.h | 5 +++++
>> fs/resctrl/monitor.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c b/fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
>> index ad7ffc6acf13..ce766b2cdfc1 100644
>> --- a/fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
>> +++ b/fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
>> @@ -569,6 +569,14 @@ void mon_event_read(struct rmid_read *rr, struct rdt_resource *r,
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> + if (resctrl_arch_mbm_cntr_assign_enabled(r) && resctrl_is_mbm_event(evtid)) {
>> + if (mbm_cntr_get(r, d, rdtgrp, evtid) < 0) {
>> + rr->err = -ENOENT;
>
> This introduces the new -ENOENT error code but rdtgroup_mondata_show() is not enabled to
> handle it. Looks like the next patch needs to be squashed into this one.
Sure.
>
>> + return;
>
> Looking at this closer this does not seem the right place for this check. This is the
> top level mon_event_read() when the user reads an event file. If this is an event
> associated with a CTRL_MON group then resctrl should sum the data of the CTRL_MON group
> and all of its MON groups.
> It may be that the CTRL_MON group's event does not have a counter assigned, but one
> or more of the MON groups do. In this case I do not think resctrl should fail reading
> the CTRL_MON's event early as is done above but still provide the sum of the events that
> can be counted in the MON groups that do have counters assigned. With that, only return
> "Unassigned" if no counter is assigned in any CTRL_MON or MON group?
Yes. Very good point. Thanks
Changed the code to just set is_mbm_cntr here.
>
>
> There also appears to be potential for a leak here with the early exit without calling
> resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_free(). As mentioned earlier in series I do not think that
> arch_mon_ctx is relevant to this counter assignment so I think mbm_update_one_event()
> as well as mon_event_read() should make calling resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_alloc()
> conditional on is_cntr/is_mbm_cntr.
Sure.
>
>
>> + }
>> + rr->is_cntr = true;
>> + }
>> +
>> cpu = cpumask_any_housekeeping(cpumask, RESCTRL_PICK_ANY_CPU);
>>
>> /*
>> diff --git a/fs/resctrl/internal.h b/fs/resctrl/internal.h
>> index 647a0466ffa0..fb4fec4a4cdc 100644
>> --- a/fs/resctrl/internal.h
>> +++ b/fs/resctrl/internal.h
>> @@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ struct mon_data {
>> * domains in @r sharing L3 @ci.id
>> * @evtid: Which monitor event to read.
>> * @first: Initialize MBM counter when true.
>> + * @is_cntr: Is the counter valid? true if "mbm_event" counter assignment mode is
>> + * enabled and it is an MBM event.
>> * @ci_id: Cacheinfo id for L3. Only set when @d is NULL. Used when summing domains.
>> * @err: Error encountered when reading counter.
>> * @val: Returned value of event counter. If @rgrp is a parent resource group,
>> @@ -124,6 +126,7 @@ struct rmid_read {
>> struct rdt_mon_domain *d;
>> enum resctrl_event_id evtid;
>> bool first;
>> + bool is_cntr;
>
> After seeing how this all comes together the "is_cntr" is very generic and not
> matching the often used "mbm_cntr". What do you think of "is_mbm_cntr"?
Sure.
>
>> unsigned int ci_id;
>> int err;
>> u64 val;
>> @@ -391,6 +394,8 @@ int rdtgroup_assign_cntr_event(struct rdt_mon_domain *d, struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp
>> struct mon_evt *mevt);
>> void rdtgroup_unassign_cntr_event(struct rdt_mon_domain *d, struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp,
>> struct mon_evt *mevt);
>> +int mbm_cntr_get(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
>> + struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, enum resctrl_event_id evtid);
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_RESCTRL_FS_PSEUDO_LOCK
>> int rdtgroup_locksetup_enter(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp);
>> diff --git a/fs/resctrl/monitor.c b/fs/resctrl/monitor.c
>> index 73f507942b6d..35faca7ff3b1 100644
>> --- a/fs/resctrl/monitor.c
>> +++ b/fs/resctrl/monitor.c
>> @@ -366,9 +366,21 @@ static int __mon_event_count(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, struct rmid_read *rr)
>> struct mbm_state *m;
>> int err, ret;
>> u64 tval = 0;
>> + int cntr_id;
>
> I've tried a couple of checkers and not all can pick up that cntr_id is always
> assigned when it is used below. While it is not necessary it will be helpful to
> initialize cntr_id here (-ENOENT?) just to avoid needing to prove that hypothetical
> reports from these checkers are false positives.
Yes.
>
>> +
>> + if (rr->is_cntr) {
>> + cntr_id = mbm_cntr_get(rr->r, rr->d, rdtgrp, rr->evtid);
>> + if (cntr_id < 0) {
>> + rr->err = -ENOENT;
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>
> This looks to be the right place for the mbm_cntr_get() check. Just keeping this one
> avoids the duplication while also makeing the code match existing user ABI.
> What do you think?
That is perfect actually.
>
>> + }
>>
>> if (rr->first) {
>> - resctrl_arch_reset_rmid(rr->r, rr->d, closid, rmid, rr->evtid);
>> + if (rr->is_cntr)
>> + resctrl_arch_reset_cntr(rr->r, rr->d, closid, rmid, cntr_id, rr->evtid);
>> + else
>> + resctrl_arch_reset_rmid(rr->r, rr->d, closid, rmid, rr->evtid);
>> m = get_mbm_state(rr->d, closid, rmid, rr->evtid);
>> if (m)
>> memset(m, 0, sizeof(struct mbm_state));
>> @@ -379,8 +391,12 @@ static int __mon_event_count(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, struct rmid_read *rr)
>> /* Reading a single domain, must be on a CPU in that domain. */
>> if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &rr->d->hdr.cpu_mask))
>> return -EINVAL;
>> - rr->err = resctrl_arch_rmid_read(rr->r, rr->d, closid, rmid,
>> - rr->evtid, &tval, rr->arch_mon_ctx);
>> + if (rr->is_cntr)
>> + rr->err = resctrl_arch_cntr_read(rr->r, rr->d, closid, rmid, cntr_id,
>> + rr->evtid, &tval, rr->arch_mon_ctx);
>> + else
>> + rr->err = resctrl_arch_rmid_read(rr->r, rr->d, closid, rmid,
>> + rr->evtid, &tval, rr->arch_mon_ctx);
>> if (rr->err)
>> return rr->err;
>>
>> @@ -405,8 +421,12 @@ static int __mon_event_count(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, struct rmid_read *rr)
>> list_for_each_entry(d, &rr->r->mon_domains, hdr.list) {
>> if (d->ci_id != rr->ci_id)
>> continue;
>> - err = resctrl_arch_rmid_read(rr->r, d, closid, rmid,
>> - rr->evtid, &tval, rr->arch_mon_ctx);
>> + if (rr->is_cntr)
>> + err = resctrl_arch_cntr_read(rr->r, d, closid, rmid, cntr_id,
>> + rr->evtid, &tval, rr->arch_mon_ctx);
>> + else
>> + err = resctrl_arch_rmid_read(rr->r, d, closid, rmid,
>> + rr->evtid, &tval, rr->arch_mon_ctx);
>> if (!err) {
>> rr->val += tval;
>> ret = 0;
>> @@ -620,6 +640,14 @@ static void mbm_update_one_event(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> + if (resctrl_arch_mbm_cntr_assign_enabled(r) && resctrl_is_mbm_event(evtid)) {
>> + if (mbm_cntr_get(r, d, rdtgrp, evtid) < 0) {
>> + rr.err = -ENOENT;
>> + return;
>> + }
>
> This can be dropped also? Only is_cntr/is_mbm_cntr needs to be set here, __mon_event_count()
> called below duplicates above snippet and will set rr->err
Sure.
>
> Same comment here about missing call to resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_free().
Sure.
>
>
>> + rr.is_cntr = true;
>> + }
>> +
>> __mon_event_count(rdtgrp, &rr);
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -982,8 +1010,8 @@ static void resctrl_config_cntr(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d
>> * Return:
>> * Valid counter ID on success, or -ENOENT on failure.
>> */
>> -static int mbm_cntr_get(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
>> - struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, enum resctrl_event_id evtid)
>> +int mbm_cntr_get(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
>> + struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, enum resctrl_event_id evtid)
>> {
>> int cntr_id;
>>
>
> Reinette
>
--
Thanks
Babu Moger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-22 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-08 22:17 [PATCH v15 00/34] fs,x86/resctrl: Support AMD Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring Counters (ABMC) Babu Moger
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 01/34] x86,fs/resctrl: Consolidate monitor event descriptions Babu Moger
2025-07-17 18:43 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-18 14:19 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 02/34] x86,fs/resctrl: Replace architecture event enabled checks Babu Moger
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 03/34] x86/resctrl: Remove 'rdt_mon_features' global variable Babu Moger
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 04/34] x86,fs/resctrl: Prepare for more monitor events Babu Moger
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 05/34] x86/cpufeatures: Add support for Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring Counters (ABMC) Babu Moger
2025-07-15 11:47 ` Peter Newman
2025-07-15 14:16 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 06/34] x86/resctrl: Add ABMC feature in the command line options Babu Moger
2025-07-17 18:44 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 07/34] x86,fs/resctrl: Consolidate monitoring related data from rdt_resource Babu Moger
2025-07-17 18:44 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 08/34] x86,fs/resctrl: Detect Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring feature details Babu Moger
2025-07-15 16:26 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-15 16:53 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-17 18:45 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-21 15:20 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 09/34] x86/resctrl: Add support to enable/disable AMD ABMC feature Babu Moger
2025-07-17 18:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 10/34] fs/resctrl: Introduce the interface to display monitoring modes Babu Moger
2025-07-17 18:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 11/34] fs/resctrl: Add resctrl file to display number of assignable counters Babu Moger
2025-07-17 18:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 12/34] fs/resctrl: Introduce mbm_cntr_cfg to track assignable counters per domain Babu Moger
2025-07-17 18:46 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 13/34] fs/resctrl: Introduce interface to display number of free MBM counters Babu Moger
2025-07-17 18:47 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 14/34] x86/resctrl: Add data structures and definitions for ABMC assignment Babu Moger
2025-07-17 18:47 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 15/34] fs/resctrl: Introduce event configuration field in struct mon_evt Babu Moger
2025-07-17 18:47 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 16/34] x86,fs/resctrl: Implement resctrl_arch_config_cntr() to assign a counter with ABMC Babu Moger
2025-07-17 18:49 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-21 17:40 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 17/34] fs/resctrl: Add the functionality to assign MBM events Babu Moger
2025-07-18 3:47 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-21 19:54 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 18/34] fs/resctrl: Add the functionality to unassign " Babu Moger
2025-07-18 3:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-21 20:21 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 19/34] fs/resctrl: Pass struct rdtgroup instead of individual members Babu Moger
2025-07-18 3:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-21 20:59 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 20/34] fs/resctrl: Introduce counter read, reset calls in mbm_event mode Babu Moger
2025-07-18 3:50 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-21 23:39 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 21/34] x86/resctrl: Refactor resctrl_arch_rmid_read() Babu Moger
2025-07-18 3:51 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-22 14:23 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-22 14:56 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-22 15:25 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 22/34] x86/resctrl: Implement resctrl_arch_reset_cntr() and resctrl_arch_cntr_read() Babu Moger
2025-07-18 3:51 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-22 15:51 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-22 23:27 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-23 16:48 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 23/34] fs/resctrl: Support counter read/reset with mbm_event assignment mode Babu Moger
2025-07-18 3:53 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-22 17:53 ` Moger, Babu [this message]
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 24/34] fs/resctrl: Report 'Unassigned' for MBM events in mbm_event mode Babu Moger
2025-07-18 3:53 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-22 18:15 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-22 23:28 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-23 0:26 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-23 2:05 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-23 13:14 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 25/34] fs/resctrl: Add definitions for MBM event configuration Babu Moger
2025-07-18 3:55 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-22 19:34 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 26/34] fs/resctrl: Add event configuration directory under info/L3_MON/ Babu Moger
2025-07-18 3:54 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-18 22:20 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-22 20:22 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-22 20:11 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 27/34] fs/resctrl: Provide interface to update the event configurations Babu Moger
2025-07-18 3:55 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-22 22:55 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 28/34] fs/resctrl: Introduce mbm_assign_on_mkdir to enable assignments on mkdir Babu Moger
2025-07-15 13:53 ` Peter Newman
2025-07-15 14:18 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-15 14:27 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-15 15:28 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 29/34] x86,fs/resctrl: Auto assign counters on mkdir and clean up on group removal Babu Moger
2025-07-18 3:56 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-22 23:59 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 30/34] fs/resctrl: Introduce mbm_L3_assignments to list assignments in a group Babu Moger
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 31/34] fs/resctrl: Introduce the interface to modify " Babu Moger
2025-07-18 4:01 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-23 16:19 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 32/34] fs/resctrl: Disable BMEC event configuration when mbm_event mode is enabled Babu Moger
2025-07-18 4:02 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-23 17:30 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 33/34] fs/resctrl: Introduce the interface to switch between monitor modes Babu Moger
2025-07-18 4:03 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-23 18:50 ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 22:17 ` [PATCH v15 34/34] x86/resctrl: Configure mbm_event mode if supported Babu Moger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=df7cee69-7873-4b6c-9401-74a7d74d672c@amd.com \
--to=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fvdl@google.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manali.shukla@amd.com \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tao1.su@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).