From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: James Sewart <jamessewart@arista.com>, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Tom Murphy <tmurphy@arista.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] iommu/vt-d: Fix-up device-domain relationship by refactoring to use iommu group default domain.
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 14:05:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dfad72a1-ce47-35bd-d965-27ef2e8bd504@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0F0C82BE-86E5-4BAC-938C-6F7629E18D27@arista.com>
Hi James,
Very glad to see this. Thank you!
On 3/4/19 11:41 PM, James Sewart wrote:
> Hey,
>
> This patchset moves IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA iommu domain management to iommu.c.
> This avoids the use of find_or_alloc_domain whose domain assignment is
> inconsistent with the iommu grouping as determined by pci_device_group.
Is this a bug fix or an improvement? What's the real issue will it cause
if we go without this patch set?
Best regards,
Lu Baolu
>
> Patch 3 permits domain type IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA to be allocated via the
> iommu_ops api, allowing the default_domain of an iommu group to be set in
> iommu.c. This domain will be attached to every device that is brought up
> with an iommu group, and the devices reserved regions will be mapped using
> regions returned by get_resv_regions.
>
> In intel_iommu_domain_alloc we don’t know the IOMMU this domain will be
> associated with so we defer full initialisation until
> intel_iommu_attach_device. Currently iommu.c:iommu_group_add_device will
> try to map a devices reserved regions before attaching the domain which
> would cause issue if the domain is not fully initialised. This is
> addressed in patch 1 by moving the mapping to after attaching.
>
> Patch 2 implements function apply_resv_region, used in
> iommu_group_create_direct_mappings to mark the reserved regions as non
> mappable for the dma_map_ops api.
>
> Patch 4 removes the domain lazy allocation logic. Before this patch the
> lazy allocation logic would not be used as any domain allocated using
> these paths would be replaced when attaching the group default domain.
> Default domain allocation has been tested with and without this patch on
> 4.19.
>
> Cheers,
> James.
>
> James Sewart (4):
> iommu: Move iommu_group_create_direct_mappings to after device_attach
> iommu/vt-d: Implement apply_resv_region for reserving IOVA ranges
> iommu/vt-d: Allow IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA and IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY to be allocated
> iommu/vt-d: Remove lazy allocation of domains
>
> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 329 ++++++++++++------------------------
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 4 +-
> 2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 225 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-05 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-04 15:41 [PATCH 0/4] iommu/vt-d: Fix-up device-domain relationship by refactoring to use iommu group default domain James Sewart
2019-03-04 15:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] iommu: Move iommu_group_create_direct_mappings to after device_attach James Sewart
2019-03-04 15:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] iommu/vt-d: Implement apply_resv_region for reserving IOVA ranges James Sewart
2019-03-04 15:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] iommu/vt-d: Allow IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA and IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY to be allocated James Sewart
2019-03-04 15:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] iommu/vt-d: Remove lazy allocation of domains James Sewart
2019-03-05 6:59 ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-05 11:46 ` James Sewart
2019-03-06 7:00 ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-06 18:08 ` James Sewart
2019-03-07 6:31 ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-07 10:21 ` James Sewart
2019-03-08 1:09 ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-08 3:09 ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-08 16:57 ` James Sewart
2019-03-09 1:53 ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-09 11:49 ` James Sewart
2019-03-10 2:51 ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-05 6:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] iommu/vt-d: Allow IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA and IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY to be allocated Lu Baolu
2019-03-05 11:34 ` James Sewart
2019-03-08 1:20 ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-03-09 11:57 ` James Sewart
2019-03-05 6:05 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2019-03-05 11:14 ` [PATCH 0/4] iommu/vt-d: Fix-up device-domain relationship by refactoring to use iommu group default domain James Sewart
2019-03-06 6:27 ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-14 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] " James Sewart
2019-03-14 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] iommu: Move iommu_group_create_direct_mappings to after device_attach James Sewart
2019-03-14 11:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] iommu/vt-d: Implement apply_resv_region for reserving IOVA ranges James Sewart
2019-03-14 11:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] iommu/vt-d: Expose ISA direct mapping region via iommu_get_resv_regions James Sewart
2019-03-15 2:19 ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-22 9:57 ` James Sewart
2019-03-25 2:03 ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-25 12:57 ` James Sewart
2019-03-26 1:10 ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-26 1:24 ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-28 18:37 ` James Sewart
2019-03-29 15:26 ` James Sewart
2019-04-04 6:49 ` Lu Baolu
2019-04-05 18:02 ` James Sewart
2019-04-08 2:43 ` Lu Baolu
2019-04-10 5:22 ` Lu Baolu
2019-04-15 14:16 ` James Sewart
2019-04-16 2:18 ` Lu Baolu
2019-04-24 23:47 ` Tom Murphy
2019-04-25 1:15 ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-14 11:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Ignore domain parameter in attach_device if device requires identity map James Sewart
2019-03-15 2:30 ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-14 11:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Enable DMA remapping after rmrr mapped James Sewart
2019-03-14 11:59 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Allow IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA to be allocated by iommu_ops James Sewart
2019-03-14 11:59 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] iommu/vt-d: Remove lazy allocation of domains James Sewart
2019-03-14 23:35 ` Jacob Pan
2019-03-22 10:07 ` James Sewart
2019-03-15 3:13 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] iommu/vt-d: Fix-up device-domain relationship by refactoring to use iommu group default domain Lu Baolu
2019-03-19 13:35 ` James Sewart
2019-03-20 1:26 ` Lu Baolu
2019-03-22 10:05 ` James Sewart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dfad72a1-ce47-35bd-d965-27ef2e8bd504@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dima@arista.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jamessewart@arista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmurphy@arista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox