From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, dalomar@serrasold.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] FRV: Fix FRV signal handling
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:18:00 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dhowells1133299080@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
The attached patch makes FRV signal handling work properly:
(1) After do_notify_resume() has been called, the work flags must be checked
again (there may be another signal to deliver or the process might require
rescheduling for instance).
(2) After the signal frame is set up on the userspace stack, ptrace() should
be given an opportunity to single-step into the signal handler.
(3) The error state from setting up a signal frame should be passed back up
the call chain.
(4) The segfault handler shouldn't be preemptively reset in the arch if we
fail to deliver a SEGV signal: force_sig() will take care of that.
Signed-Off-By: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---
warthog>diffstat -p1 frv-signal-2615rc2.diff
arch/frv/kernel/entry.S | 2 -
arch/frv/kernel/signal.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff -uNrp linux-2.6.15-rc2-frv-shmem/arch/frv/kernel/entry.S linux-2.6.15-rc2-frv-signal/arch/frv/kernel/entry.S
--- linux-2.6.15-rc2-frv-shmem/arch/frv/kernel/entry.S 2005-03-02 12:07:44.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.15-rc2-frv-signal/arch/frv/kernel/entry.S 2005-11-29 16:01:40.000000000 +0000
@@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@ __entry_work_notifysig:
LEDS 0x6410
ori.p gr4,#0,gr8
call do_notify_resume
- bra __entry_return_direct
+ bra __entry_resume_userspace
# perform syscall entry tracing
__syscall_trace_entry:
diff -uNrp linux-2.6.15-rc2-frv-shmem/arch/frv/kernel/signal.c linux-2.6.15-rc2-frv-signal/arch/frv/kernel/signal.c
--- linux-2.6.15-rc2-frv-shmem/arch/frv/kernel/signal.c 2005-11-01 13:18:57.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.15-rc2-frv-signal/arch/frv/kernel/signal.c 2005-11-29 16:41:11.000000000 +0000
@@ -297,7 +297,8 @@ static inline void __user *get_sigframe(
/*
*
*/
-static void setup_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, sigset_t *set, struct pt_regs * regs)
+static int setup_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, sigset_t *set,
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct sigframe __user *frame;
int rsig;
@@ -362,26 +363,30 @@ static void setup_frame(int sig, struct
set_fs(USER_DS);
+ /* the tracer may want to single-step inside the handler */
+ if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP))
+ ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP);
+
#if DEBUG_SIG
printk("SIG deliver %d (%s:%d): sp=%p pc=%lx ra=%p\n",
- sig, current->comm, current->pid, frame, regs->pc, frame->pretcode);
+ sig, current->comm, current->pid, frame, regs->pc,
+ frame->pretcode);
#endif
- return;
+ return 1;
give_sigsegv:
- if (sig == SIGSEGV)
- ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
-
force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
+ return 0;
+
} /* end setup_frame() */
/*****************************************************************************/
/*
*
*/
-static void setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
- sigset_t *set, struct pt_regs * regs)
+static int setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
+ sigset_t *set, struct pt_regs * regs)
{
struct rt_sigframe __user *frame;
int rsig;
@@ -457,17 +462,21 @@ static void setup_rt_frame(int sig, stru
set_fs(USER_DS);
+ /* the tracer may want to single-step inside the handler */
+ if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP))
+ ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP);
+
#if DEBUG_SIG
printk("SIG deliver %d (%s:%d): sp=%p pc=%lx ra=%p\n",
- sig, current->comm, current->pid, frame, regs->pc, frame->pretcode);
+ sig, current->comm, current->pid, frame, regs->pc,
+ frame->pretcode);
#endif
- return;
+ return 1;
give_sigsegv:
- if (sig == SIGSEGV)
- ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
+ return 0;
} /* end setup_rt_frame() */
@@ -475,10 +484,12 @@ give_sigsegv:
/*
* OK, we're invoking a handler
*/
-static void handle_signal(unsigned long sig, siginfo_t *info,
- struct k_sigaction *ka, sigset_t *oldset,
- struct pt_regs *regs)
+static int handle_signal(unsigned long sig, siginfo_t *info,
+ struct k_sigaction *ka, sigset_t *oldset,
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ int ret;
+
/* Are we from a system call? */
if (in_syscall(regs)) {
/* If so, check system call restarting.. */
@@ -493,6 +504,7 @@ static void handle_signal(unsigned long
regs->gr8 = -EINTR;
break;
}
+
/* fallthrough */
case -ERESTARTNOINTR:
regs->gr8 = regs->orig_gr8;
@@ -502,16 +514,22 @@ static void handle_signal(unsigned long
/* Set up the stack frame */
if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO)
- setup_rt_frame(sig, ka, info, oldset, regs);
+ ret = setup_rt_frame(sig, ka, info, oldset, regs);
else
- setup_frame(sig, ka, oldset, regs);
+ ret = setup_frame(sig, ka, oldset, regs);
+
+ if (ret) {
+ spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
+ sigorsets(¤t->blocked, ¤t->blocked,
+ &ka->sa.sa_mask);
+ if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER))
+ sigaddset(¤t->blocked, sig);
+ recalc_sigpending();
+ spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
+ }
+
+ return ret;
- spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
- sigorsets(¤t->blocked, ¤t->blocked, &ka->sa.sa_mask);
- if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER))
- sigaddset(¤t->blocked, sig);
- recalc_sigpending();
- spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
} /* end handle_signal() */
/*****************************************************************************/
@@ -542,12 +560,10 @@ int do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs, sigs
oldset = ¤t->blocked;
signr = get_signal_to_deliver(&info, &ka, regs, NULL);
- if (signr > 0) {
- handle_signal(signr, &info, &ka, oldset, regs);
- return 1;
- }
+ if (signr > 0)
+ return handle_signal(signr, &info, &ka, oldset, regs);
- no_signal:
+no_signal:
/* Did we come from a system call? */
if (regs->syscallno >= 0) {
/* Restart the system call - no handlers present */
@@ -565,6 +581,7 @@ int do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs, sigs
}
return 0;
+
} /* end do_signal() */
/*****************************************************************************/
next reply other threads:[~2005-11-29 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-29 21:18 David Howells [this message]
2005-11-29 21:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] Handle TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK for FRV David Howells
2005-11-29 21:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] FRV: Improve signal handling David Howells
2005-11-29 21:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] Handle TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK for i386 David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dhowells1133299080@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dalomar@serrasold.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=uclinux-dev@uclinux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox