From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f202.google.com (mail-pl1-f202.google.com [209.85.214.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95CC22F0C64 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2025 11:08:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.202 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759144126; cv=none; b=dY1d1xsqAXwE27wsfZ6G1kKb+3LOeWkWmLvY/YjChCUsvEU+Z6nsQLwwMpcifr5z4CDR0GWf96AybxAXGdTRBxfdLZx3iblZPUUMtFo9nQ7jvi9bsd0BZvnKocx4dqVstBJuFSAdfPGwmg2laZjf/fOHQC+B5GwclWB9bejzFC8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759144126; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hdjpsqBQu61DyVagvgahThUPYRdAH4vy0QtTHyTWGxw=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=geOp7VoOtVR0qKoezL/b9fF/omNpWXKH0Cz4wcDtpIpdU9OUsQrLaYSZ+JNL9WZLYw1siQaFaeMiefzqFdbOFH1DoQXVDWZvYN+IhJjIVgqoM0HeRCNEbGWBCsBmY1zZqeHhjhrJMT9T/ueJnQ3JXYotxxzbP+L3rryrhy3a3cU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--ackerleytng.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=zYlo/FtA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.202 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--ackerleytng.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="zYlo/FtA" Received: by mail-pl1-f202.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-272b7bdf41fso48232135ad.0 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2025 04:08:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1759144124; x=1759748924; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=j2yjbN9juVGMo8fZY1zQGvyTlUSOLdTWsAnWf7KowEQ=; b=zYlo/FtApOPG9ShZ4BJEghrPvew7BAyKE9OtXkWZMnRgpn2svJVSmJ8DoUltvxdR3h 7wAy51op15KMygMMQEUzYYWuDovH5QRvOe3ii+pHPDwSCSNyTiKvW0ASXzwq9hCSsf0H l1/HjjkiIT8EOa88NLFRd3ecGqGnT4K6no1BO72toUlGh3Gpce84d+NUN6oNhAg8tjFr 0DpRwzSZFdILnzFpmK3wl4173Sef6zPKElIP1FlA0yzo/pNE321EN9y2mLO2xsV6akIb V71booQusask4z834TkCVRbFB9khtiHwUiNhCv5ZVmyinOt2AJqARI7pZRo8HtXX1yUi mRww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1759144124; x=1759748924; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=j2yjbN9juVGMo8fZY1zQGvyTlUSOLdTWsAnWf7KowEQ=; b=CEn/4a/5ExVpb/0aILa+ylU2PA2Hn9jhKLPBeyeXh4T+FeD66uoQ1VEgS1oNo2GJp0 AWIdr552qHnnx9BcUUOYNUMUEwwkouzrZ0HY8XAk74OVFhLONResRawnalrf8yQMBWMF q0aBS3e5bvvACe2Zb83lTUeziEVa8+GdOaCvwj75Fc42YgsYi7ZJPteqHRfx+LJCr+Vq Y3WoyvE+c4v9I6p1gmIXBECYK4H//jEK7GyAoE6DaHTgA4onoq8mU0pmsSvv0nNjAVBK KIwquTfcYT8QpRQjkFdVp1ZuAbnlBCE27QBQtcEyVbqTyUVFN1R0kpWKcZwlh2l7NW1K ZmTg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXETPsogWSrkdaKPzNLgjClZhzQxmFJ2GftPAxV+1kntl1d4Crx8Yp/06RkShBTifW23DkyBxTBLMvi2MQ=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzJz3fKauKaKkZN7il9CCMUoEC6Z6vfTCLBwJjkduoCSHEPzqWg P5mLlsqFrLlOtJiDeepqkv5OsU7cOOwAkTIz0ELZCDtYX3rVL1YfQhjgNUenvWpCrGfkLpjH0QT twyFqhLmjSSYSuQ7mGEX0t4MmOQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHuPIaRFJxDj/huyHX+uSCwuhn3swqG4HaD2/bSj8EJanq/QQwZ5pQwhOflDYNAUnm8z9sY0oB8PxnBLw/38w== X-Received: from plsq7.prod.google.com ([2002:a17:902:bd87:b0:267:e964:bc69]) (user=ackerleytng job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a17:902:e5cb:b0:25c:5bda:53a8 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-27ed4a31173mr183493275ad.37.1759144123876; Mon, 29 Sep 2025 04:08:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 11:08:42 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20250926163114.2626257-6-seanjc@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20250926163114.2626257-1-seanjc@google.com> <20250926163114.2626257-6-seanjc@google.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] KVM: selftests: Add wrappers for mmap() and munmap() to assert success From: Ackerley Tng To: Sean Christopherson , Paolo Bonzini , Christian Borntraeger , Janosch Frank , Claudio Imbrenda Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , Fuad Tabba , Sean Christopherson Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sean Christopherson writes: > Add and use wrappers for mmap() and munmap() that assert success to reduce > a significant amount of boilerplate code, to ensure all tests assert on > failure, and to provide consistent error messages on failure. > > No functional change intended. > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson > --- > .../testing/selftests/kvm/guest_memfd_test.c | 21 +++------ > .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h | 25 +++++++++++ > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 44 +++++++------------ > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/mmu_stress_test.c | 5 +-- > .../selftests/kvm/s390/ucontrol_test.c | 16 +++---- > .../selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c | 17 ++++--- > 6 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) > > > [...snip...] > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h > index 23a506d7eca3..1c68ff0fb3fb 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h > @@ -278,6 +278,31 @@ static inline bool kvm_has_cap(long cap) > #define __KVM_SYSCALL_ERROR(_name, _ret) \ > "%s failed, rc: %i errno: %i (%s)", (_name), (_ret), errno, strerror(errno) > > +static inline void *__kvm_mmap(size_t size, int prot, int flags, int fd, > + off_t offset) Do you have a policy/rationale for putting this in kvm_util.h as opposed to test_util.h? I like the idea of this wrapper but I thought this is less of a kvm thing and more of a test utility, and hence it belongs in test_util.c and test_util.h. Also, the name kind of associates mmap with KVM too closely IMO, but test_mmap() is not a great name either. No strong opinions here. Reviewed-by: Ackerley Tng > +{ > + void *mem; > + > + mem = mmap(NULL, size, prot, flags, fd, offset); > + TEST_ASSERT(mem != MAP_FAILED, __KVM_SYSCALL_ERROR("mmap()", > + (int)(unsigned long)MAP_FAILED)); > + > + return mem; > +} > + > +static inline void *kvm_mmap(size_t size, int prot, int flags, int fd) > +{ > + return __kvm_mmap(size, prot, flags, fd, 0); > +} > + > > [...snip...] >