From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750940AbWBJEn1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 23:43:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750941AbWBJEn1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 23:43:27 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:7563 "EHLO hera.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750938AbWBJEn0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 23:43:26 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstatat64 support Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 20:43:05 -0800 (PST) Organization: Mostly alphabetical, except Q, with we do not fancy Message-ID: References: <200602082008.k18K8dqE026598@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20060208204015.GA25477@infradead.org> <43EA5CCD.7030605@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: terminus.zytor.com 1139546585 376 127.0.0.1 (10 Feb 2006 04:43:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@terminus.zytor.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 04:43:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Followup to: <43EA5CCD.7030605@redhat.com> By author: Ulrich Drepper In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > please remove the new from the syscall name. just sys_fstatat64 > > I use that to show the lineage. We use newfstat etc for the current > generation of interfaces. Using fstatat would be irritating IMO. > Eh? We don't use sys_newfstat for the current generation, we use sys_fstat64. This would be the "at" version of sys_fstat64, so the only sane name of this system call is sys_fstatat64. -hpa