From: "Zhao, Yakui" <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Chen, Jason CJ" <jason.cj.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 4/4] x86/acrn: Add hypercall for ACRN guest
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 09:56:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e04c43cf-029b-d459-e9d9-1a1f5c403dab@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190427085816.GB12360@zn.tnic>
On 2019年04月27日 16:58, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:18:48AM +0800, Zhao, Yakui wrote:
>> It seems that it is seldom used in kernel although the explicit register
>> variable is supported by GCC and makes the code look simpler. And it seems
>> that the explicit register variable is not suppoorted by CLAG.
>
> The more reason not to do it this way. Also, the "register" variable
> specification is not very widespread in x86 when you look at
>
> $ git grep -E "register\s.*asm" arch/x86/
>
> output.
Yes. The explicit register variable is not very videspread for arch/x86.
So the register variable will be removed for ACRN hypercall.
>
>> So the explicit register variable will be removed. I will follow the asm
>> code from Borislav. Of course one minor change is that the "movq" is used
>> instead of "mov".
>
> Does that matter if your destination register is 64-bit?
Thanks for the reminder about the access width.
It is 64-bit register. What I said is the "movq", not "movl".
(I understand that movl is incorrect for 64-bit register).
Thanks
Yakui
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-28 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-24 0:54 [RFC PATCH v5 0/4] x86: Add the support of ACRN guest under x86 Zhao Yakui
2019-04-24 0:54 ` [RFC PATCH v5 1/4] x86/Kconfig: Add new config symbol to unify conditional definition of hv_irq_callback_count Zhao Yakui
2019-04-24 0:54 ` [RFC PATCH v5 2/4] x86: Add the support of Linux guest on ACRN hypervisor Zhao Yakui
2019-04-24 0:54 ` [RFC PATCH v5 3/4] x86/acrn: Use HYPERVISOR_CALLBACK_VECTOR for ACRN guest upcall vector Zhao Yakui
2019-04-25 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-25 12:42 ` Zhao, Yakui
2019-04-25 19:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-26 1:46 ` Zhao, Yakui
2019-04-26 5:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-24 0:54 ` [RFC PATCH v5 4/4] x86/acrn: Add hypercall for ACRN guest Zhao Yakui
2019-04-25 7:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-25 10:16 ` Zhao, Yakui
2019-04-25 11:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-26 3:18 ` Zhao, Yakui
2019-04-27 8:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-28 1:56 ` Zhao, Yakui [this message]
2019-04-28 10:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-29 1:24 ` Zhao, Yakui
2019-04-29 7:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-29 9:52 ` Zhao, Yakui
2019-04-24 22:20 ` [RFC PATCH v5 0/4] x86: Add the support of ACRN guest under x86 Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-25 5:44 ` Zhao, Yakui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e04c43cf-029b-d459-e9d9-1a1f5c403dab@intel.com \
--to=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jason.cj.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox