From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F5B2C74A4B for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 08:44:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229847AbjCMIof (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Mar 2023 04:44:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49200 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229534AbjCMIoa (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Mar 2023 04:44:30 -0400 Received: from madras.collabora.co.uk (madras.collabora.co.uk [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e5ab]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59642222FC; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 01:44:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (2-237-20-237.ip236.fastwebnet.it [2.237.20.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by madras.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3916C6603084; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 08:44:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1678697068; bh=7sp5OBBrmpEeatddKwhM+lwytmkkMBBdKyeH5esSn5w=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=URmi3h55rHOXuFaFDpXyjqFwC2AM9oj/jA/N6W3on5mk7UzK2MxULSlHGp7T77hBe dWYzpktDKUExA68Q7xud0dv+wpUZkc+M4SnVJ59FA/3XwHenlTs1fGyEDt+sL9AYyg s4sO12HOKDWiJiMNtNyv4vTa/3qyYbstAM4Ebp74pYfrAQB2MwSvedqtL3+CVW/Miq PE232fdSbE1cB4VSLlSnFZz8j4epOxMNgKOdOgGrJG2u4DKxey1y+zJFy8JxTNnrW9 vePjz3sD+DWyldubvYworA66OgL1GkyFoMg9AGeIrP8E+maWaAA/OAnQ3L4qA2HuME feZ0B1u7L+o1A== Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 09:44:24 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence Content-Language: en-US To: Rob Herring , Sean Wang , Linus Walleij , Tony Lindgren , Haojian Zhuang , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Geert Uytterhoeven , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Samuel Holland , Matthias Brugger Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev References: <20230310144721.1544669-1-robh@kernel.org> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno In-Reply-To: <20230310144721.1544669-1-robh@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Il 10/03/23 15:47, Rob Herring ha scritto: > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. > of_property_read_ functions) rather than low-level > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As > part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the > recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test > for presence of a property and nothing more. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno