From: Phong Tran <tranmanphong@gmail.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
ruscur@russell.cc
Cc: tranmanphong@gmail.com, steve.capper@arm.com,
steven.price@arm.com, keescook@chromium.org, greg@kroah.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, alexios.zavras@intel.com,
broonie@kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: add check_wx_pages debugfs for CHECK_WX
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:52:41 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e06b1ad1-08ca-ec50-7ca1-7d08bbea81b3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200422152656.GF676@willie-the-truck>
On 4/22/20 10:26 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 03:35:27PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:35:58AM +0700, Phong Tran wrote:
>>> follow the suggestion from
>>> https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/35
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Phong Tran <tranmanphong@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> Change since v1:
>>> - Update the Kconfig help text
>>> - Don't check the return value of debugfs_create_file()
>>> - Tested on QEMU aarch64
>>
>> As on v1, I think that this should be generic across all architectures
>> with CONFIG_DEBUG_WX. Adding this only on arm64 under
>> CONFIG_PTDUMP_DEBUGFS (which does not generally imply a WX check)
>> doesn't seem right.
>>
>> Maybe we need a new ARCH_HAS_CHECK_WX config to make that simpler, but
>> that seems simple to me.
>
> Agreed. When I asked about respinning, I assumed this would be done in
> generic code as you requested on the first version. Phong -- do you think
> you can take a look at that, please?
>
sure, plan to make change in mm/ptdump.c with KConfig
"ARCH_HAS_CHECK_WX" as suggestion.
Then need align with this patch in PowerPC arch also
https://lore.kernel.org/kernel-hardening/20200402084053.188537-3-ruscur@russell.cc/
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
index a1efa246c9ed..50f18e7ff2ae 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ config ARM64_RANDOMIZE_TEXT_OFFSET
config DEBUG_WX
bool "Warn on W+X mappings at boot"
+ select ARCH_HAS_CHECK_WX
select PTDUMP_CORE
---help---
Generate a warning if any W+X mappings are found at boot.
diff --git a/mm/Kconfig.debug b/mm/Kconfig.debug
index 0271b22e063f..40c9ac5a4db2 100644
--- a/mm/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/mm/Kconfig.debug
@@ -138,3 +138,6 @@ config PTDUMP_DEBUGFS
kernel.
If in doubt, say N.
+
+config ARCH_HAS_CHECK_WX
+ bool
diff --git a/mm/ptdump.c b/mm/ptdump.c
index 26208d0d03b7..8f54db007aaa 100644
--- a/mm/ptdump.c
+++ b/mm/ptdump.c
@@ -137,3 +137,29 @@ void ptdump_walk_pgd(struct ptdump_state *st,
struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
/* Flush out the last page */
st->note_page(st, 0, -1, 0);
}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CHECK_WX
+#include <linux/debugfs.h>
+#include <asm/ptdump.h>
+
+static int check_wx_debugfs_set(void *data, u64 val)
+{
+ if (val != 1ULL)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ptdump_check_wx();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(check_wx_fops, NULL, check_wx_debugfs_set,
"%llu\n");
+
+static int ptdump_debugfs_check_wx_init(void)
+{
+ debugfs_create_file("check_wx_pages", 0200, NULL,
+ NULL, &check_wx_fops) ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+device_initcall(ptdump_debugfs_check_wx_init);
+#endif
Regards,
Phong.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-24 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-07 9:39 [PATCH] arm64: add check_wx_pages debugfs for CHECK_WX Phong Tran
2020-03-09 10:32 ` Steven Price
2020-03-09 12:17 ` Mark Rutland
2020-03-09 12:21 ` Greg KH
2020-03-09 16:15 ` Kees Cook
2020-03-09 16:51 ` Mark Rutland
2020-04-20 20:42 ` Will Deacon
2020-04-21 17:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Phong Tran
2020-04-22 13:32 ` Steven Price
2020-04-22 14:35 ` Mark Rutland
2020-04-22 15:26 ` Will Deacon
2020-04-22 17:11 ` Mark Rutland
2020-04-24 10:52 ` Phong Tran [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e06b1ad1-08ca-ec50-7ca1-7d08bbea81b3@gmail.com \
--to=tranmanphong@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexios.zavras@intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ruscur@russell.cc \
--cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox