From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5321838DD4; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 17:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717696156; cv=none; b=IvguAVqbUNe8VJr4uHdKfqb9OxT4vzHNLzEXsz7on2xsawfXwVPCaK4U/aupPsWLkOKkNQwnQ6FjADdRCpsmuj30Yr0dluI8OG5DfagdHN12iSWpFlqnalxEIv4xuZVmfiZkuRPoqO0s/MJfvcj5x3KU4zdmmHxRzwR+kcya8kk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717696156; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Uc66ZahAHHtHtTYTS0mbdnlBa5pdBcxK5nf0A3lkJBo=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=FDgRMEXUinZbC/AXHXwp7DdFZX3rPH7cZyAW+jOJuB/Te5QnBXuMnyiQYIPQPFdEZz/3uHq91ntatthmh+ByhgvMp82jVrF7brfUD/lVela1er89MkNqn0kRgF0aezLVsqFmCc4OomiOeTYtHSiI4k3mSJh8naRzAtdjs72V1+E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SUwkNXby; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SUwkNXby" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63895C2BD10; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 17:49:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1717696156; bh=Uc66ZahAHHtHtTYTS0mbdnlBa5pdBcxK5nf0A3lkJBo=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=SUwkNXbyHOTPQhIBC3BTsZ4sStX7BsNBZXk+74l3548f63PXdHR0Cs9jcCR4pNfnO Mcd4y9b6JedirAMsGywJjnmpDjaiOxb5suMesXLQVwV8j9Tp9PDMr9AdPC+d5owncn UJAalpk8i6Q7DgutTTovk+zeus3WgUR/pLlZ+wxy4qNCDQKnj5zSCkgNQoiN1DuXUU DWqeX7G9Xfe4Fbel0S9cp25TiEzp8onXFYQWBzemCNpvGPPxBut3ByJcLdXglis3m7 0D1JrDCKsk3IFZpqAma62HEx89wWFQq/vD4f3lbfYn0cIrZp+oxlhQGfv2S63rG7SB PfK7yKRgKcA5w== Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 12:49:13 -0500 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: stratix10: socdk: drop unneeded flash address/size-cells To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20240401141025.98125-1-krzk@kernel.org> <6d2cf4d9-0b6d-4fb2-a130-7695baa118c3@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Dinh Nguyen In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/4/24 05:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 05/04/2024 14:30, Dinh Nguyen wrote: >> On 4/1/24 09:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> Flash node uses single "partition" node to describe partitions, so >>> remove deprecated address/size-cells properties to also fix dtc W=1 >>> warnings: >>> >>> socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts:182.10-211.4: Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc@0/spi@ff8d2000/flash@0: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts | 2 -- >>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts >>> index 26173f0b0051..4eee777ef1a1 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts >>> @@ -180,8 +180,6 @@ rtc@68 { >>> &qspi { >>> status = "okay"; >>> flash@0 { >>> - #address-cells = <1>; >>> - #size-cells = <1>; >>> compatible = "micron,mt25qu02g", "jedec,spi-nor"; >>> reg = <0>; >>> spi-max-frequency = <100000000>; >> >> All patches applied! > > This was two months ago, so it should reach v6.10-rc1. It is neither in > v6.10-rc1 nor in linux-next. > > Are you sure you applied this? > > Are your trees in linux-next? I apologize, I miss the PR for the v6.10. I have it queue for v6.11. Dinh