From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63E25330D23; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 18:29:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771871367; cv=none; b=Zfmkf6WOdtaXjJ5G0wXQE/670TTqqS2w5MZeY2udFA0AYbGpc/RnGYKIuj40Qa7MvLQPQ6GC7jyiWGQK4h1+ooqidq4WXL1zcoBh2gF5OtMlvF0g6xbpr108Id6KXrkDqZBBg4nA00ASZubksSgGYnblI3948iF2RkozG9AuU2g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771871367; c=relaxed/simple; bh=f8Y9T7jUIRJHt52mwSlo+OZGMV3OmtVt1CFMimMKfhk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=uCXNbuNDhjGxVFqbjeyUNtAFL3xJsRssQF+TVFzqFY0WmmRbf6F9MmTThRjXYt8l7BIgPPK9wbqrRmN9w7MZ07A422efH8Uh+kPGhSzgwMYxejpuQGpMixKzLibmS2jIo6jn3c6rAovk/YMAJdFyb0YYMQi4yVPR6goRhNO9iFQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=D+ZEZns8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="D+ZEZns8" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1771871364; bh=f8Y9T7jUIRJHt52mwSlo+OZGMV3OmtVt1CFMimMKfhk=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=D+ZEZns8k6dR0nXRDqaipPSO0rIkEfbGuUR4zYwNKoBDA2u71/+fwR0FcCn6cZBR0 G+NiNTIP+KZvtw+frCTb2F4TRxkJ7FYobhJalUWzUPrh/l7x3tlt2ZF9XlHK+glzAN fsyBke84OLf5/KutIll9hq6Q89kpj/xenVBre5nnYx6QkeKKCTD0myMMP2fAxn11N3 +XhDfmf14+T84ZN2FRn1cB5cVFpygQyGRPKJMxx34y2+BOItmho/C/yzzgJMZ5n82W 7abWKLVv2LHgGKT8VXiD2GpPhWUkDwme217BFdcPd+OT6gVPeGMJLmcsK9TejLOqir 3r8fNnypcMfFw== Received: from [192.168.1.90] (unknown [86.123.23.225]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: cristicc) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48DE117E003F; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 19:29:24 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 20:29:23 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix vdec register blocks order on RK3576 To: Sebastian Reichel Cc: Diederik de Haas , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner , Detlev Casanova , kernel@collabora.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260223-vdec-reg-order-rk3576-v1-1-560976566bd3@collabora.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Cristian Ciocaltea In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Sebastian, On 2/23/26 8:21 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 07:07:42PM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote: >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip,vdec.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip,vdec.yaml >> @@ -34,10 +34,12 @@ properties: >> - description: The cache configuration registers base >> >> reg-names: >> - items: >> + oneOf: >> - const: function >> - - const: link >> - - const: cache >> + - items: >> + - const: link >> + - const: function >> + - const: cache >> >> interrupts: >> maxItems: 1 >> > > With that change the descriptions in the reg section are wrong. Yeah, I assumed it'd be acceptable for the description to document just once all possible items, to avoid repeating this for all possible combinations. E.g. this is from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml: resets: minItems: 1 items: - description: GMAC stmmaceth reset - description: AHB reset reset-names: oneOf: - items: - enum: [stmmaceth, ahb] - items: - const: stmmaceth - const: ahb Thanks, Cristian